• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/56

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

56 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
  • 3rd side (hint)
hypothesis testing
whether a hypothesis is supported by the results of a research project
inferential statistics
drawing conclusions about a population based on data collected form a sample
compare measure of dependent variable in each group
null hypothesis
predicts that there is no difference between the groups being compared
there's no difference!
alternative hypothesis
a significant difference exists between the groups being compared
difference!!
one tailed hypothesis
researcher predicts the direction of the expected difference between groups
for a directional alternative hypothesis
two-tailed hypothesis
groups being compared differ but doesn't predict the direction of the difference
non-directional alternative hypothesis
type I error
difference, but in reality, there isnt
false alarms
type II error
there is a difference, when in reality there is
failed to reject null hypothesis
statistical significance
2 descriptive statistics that's unlikely to have occurred by chance
single-group design
one group of participants
z test
compare a sample with a population to assess whether the sample differs significantly from the population
tesing the null hypothesis on a single sample
sampling disitribution
a distribution of sample means based on random samples of a fixed size from a population
a distribution of statistics obtained by selecting all possible samples of a specific size from a population
standard error of the mean
standard deviation of the sampling distribution
critical value
value of a test statistic that marks the edge of the region of rejection in a sampling distribution, where values equal to it or beyond it fall in the region of rejection
region of rejection
area of sampling distribution that lies beyond the test statistic's critical value; when a score falls within this region, Ho is rejected
statistical power
probability of correctly rejecting a false Ho
test will correctly reject a false null hypothesis
confidence interval
interval of a certain width which we feel confident will contain population mean
t test
test of the null hypothesis for a single sample where population variance is not known
student's t distribution
curve was symmetrical, but it wasn't the standard normal curve
degrees of freedom
number of scores in a sample that are free to vary
z test
compare a sample with a population to assess whether the sample differs significantly from the population
how many SD above or below the mean score falls
sampling disitribution
a distribution of sample means based on random samples of a fixed size from a population
estimated standard error of the mean
standard deviation of the sampling distribution
chi-square
comparing categorical information against what we would expect based on previous knowledge
observed frequency
frequency with which participants fall into a category
expected frequency
requency expected in a category if the sample data represent the population
independent-groups t test
a parametric inferential test for comparing sample means of two independent groups of scores
between participants when participants are NOT matched
effect size
how big a role the conditions of the independent variable play in determining scores on the dependent variable
an estimate of the effect of the IV, regardless of sample size. is difference meaningful?
cohen's d
inferential statistic for measuring effect size
correlated-groups t test
compares the means of participants in 2 groups
comparing mean difference of correlated scores
difference scores
scores represnting the difference between participants' performance in a second condition
wilcoxon rank-sum test
nonparametric inferential test for comparing sample medians of 2 independent groups of scores
teacher ranks the female and male giving the student who read the fewest a rank of 1, and who read the most the highest rank.
chi-square test of independence
comparing how well an observed breakdown of people over various cateogries fits some expected breakdown
comparing how well an observed breakdown of people over various categories fits some expected breakdown
phi coefficient
an inferential test used to determine effect size for a chi-square test
bonferroni adjustment
desire alpha level is divided by the number of tests or comparisons, is typically used to accomplisht his
minimize chance of a type I error when making multiple comparisons, but increases type II error
ANOVA (analysis of variance)
comparing means of 3 or more groups
allows us to analyze the variance in a study
one-way randomized ANOVA
comparing means of 3 or more groups using a between-participants design and one IV
grand mean
the mean performance across all participants in a study
error variance
amount of variability among the scores caused by chance or uncontrolled variables
such as individual differences between participants
within-groups varaince
variance w/in each condition; an estimate of the population error variance
within-subjects: same people exposed to each level of IV
between-groups variance
estimate of the effect of the independent variable and error variance
between-subjects: different people are exposed to the each level of the IV
f-ratio
ratio of between-groups variance to within-groups variance
total sum of squares
sum of squared deviations of each score for the grandmean
how much each individual participant varies from the grand mean
within-groups sum of quares
sum of the squared deviations of each score from its group mean
between-groups sum of squares
sum of the squared deviations of each group's mean form the gran mean, multiplied by the number of participants in each group
post hoc test
comparing each of the groups in the study with each of the other groups to determine which ones differ significantly from each other
permits multiple compariosns and still manitain alpha (the probablity of a type I error) at .05
Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD)
post hoc test used w/ ANOVAs for making all pairwise comparisons when conditions have equal n
allows a researcher to make all pairwise comparisons among the sample means in a study while mantaining an acceptable alpha (usually .05 but could be .01)
one-way repeated measure ANOVA
comparing the means of 2 or more groups using a correlated-groups design and one IV
mesares are taken repeatedly on the same individuals; same participants serve in all conditions
factorial design
more than one IV
factorial notation
how may IVs are used in a study and how many levels are use for each variable
each number in the notation specifies the number of levels of a single IV. 3 x 6 has 2 IVs, one IV has 3 levels the other 6.
main effect
an effect of a single independent variable
2 IVs may have 2 main effects, an effect of word type and an effect of rehearsal type
interaction effect
effect of each IV across the levels of the other IV
interaction between 2 IVs, effect of 1 IV depends on the level of the otehr IV
treatment carryover effect
earlier treatment affects later treatment
sensitization effect
performance changes due to hypothesis guessing
practice effect
performance improves later mesaures
fatigue effect
performance declines on later measures