Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
15 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Problem
|
A situation in which there is no apparent or immediate routine way of reaching a goal.
|
|
The structure of a problem (3 pars)
|
1. Goal state --> this is where you want to be...this is the solution to the problem
2. Initial state --> This is where you are now as you face the problem. 3. Set of operations --> you can apply to get from the initial state to the goal state. |
|
Well-Defined Problems
|
Problems in which the initial state and the goal state are clearly defined and the possible moves are known (ex: chess)
|
|
Ill-defined Problems
|
The initial and goal states are not clear..steps aren't clear how to get to goal state
|
|
Problem Space Theory
|
1. Problem solving is a search within a problem space
2. A problem space is a set of possible choices that face a problem solver @ each step in moving from initial state to goal state |
|
Experts (Representation)
|
Experts organise their knowledge in terms of deeper abstract principles
|
|
Experts (encoding)
|
Experts "chunk" info
Experts are better at meaningful info but not random info |
|
Experts (Strategy)
|
Experts tend to employ a forward search: search from initial state to goal state.
Novices tend to employ a backward search from goal state to initial state. |
|
ANALOGICAL reasoning
|
A process of comparison, using knowlege of relatively known domain and applying it to another domain.
|
|
INDUCTIVE reasoning
|
Any thought process that uses our knowlege of specific known instances to draw an inference about unknown instances.
|
|
Confirmation Bias
|
The predisposition to weigh info in ways consistent with pre-existing beliefs.
|
|
Deductive Reasoning
|
If the premises are true, then the conclusion cannot be false
|
|
Valid Conclusion
|
A conclusion that follows from the given premises by the laws of deductive logic.
|
|
Form Errors
|
Result from errors in the format of the premise-conclusion relationship
|
|
Content Errors
|
Result when the content of the syllogism is overly influential.
|