• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/10

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

10 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Give an outline for Converse:
-Important and predictable differences in the ideological world
-These differences are easily overlooked
-Thinks there are two sets of ideologues
-Thinks people strive for consistency; dissonance
-That ideology can be a heuristic
-Involves ideological constraints
-People aren't aware their thoughts are consistent unless they are of the elite class
-Americans use little constraint; communist atheists, welfare low taxes
Give an outline for Burden and Klostad:
-Party ID: An individuals affective orientation to a group in his environment
-Realized that initially they were asking a cognitive 'think' question, realized they should ask psych 'feel' question
-developed a survey experiment and split ballot design, both have response latency especially for Reps
-Response latency is based on people thinking things through
-Found think = D feel = R
-Huge implications just beginning to be known
-Explains why the Rep electorate is so strong
Give and outline of Conover and Feldman:
-Realize that lib/con IDs are important when determining votig behavior
-So longs as people are group members, they hold others either positively or neg
E.g. Pro-capitalist, social controlists, against a change in quid pro quo would be positive to Reps
-Results if one is a lib/con have 2 meanings: cognitive and evaluative
-3 classes of variables, self ID, evaluative (thermo), and symbolic (issues)
-For most people, party ID is central to them and is the most consistant political view a person will ever have
-Symbolic<Eval<Self ID
-lib/con ideology is heuristic
-there is an overlap and they are related, but one does not predetermine the other
Give an outline of Krosnick and Kinder:
-Used a theory for priming, the more media attention, more public is primed and therefore this needs to be evaluated into the overall issue judgment
-Results 3 fold
1)C.A. seen as more important
2)Increased priming is from media
3)Priming more pronounced in evaluations of RRs performance
-Scandal weakens political support
-In cases like IC, people forgo analysis for heuristics
-3 considerations
1) PO and TV are related
2) Some people more priming susceptible than others
3)News coverage did not harm RRs character, just evaluation of his performance
-Citizens hold RR differently pre vs. post IC
-Priming says that this is attached to events and is highly influenced by the media
-The dumbest citizens make priming more successful
Give and outline for Marcus and MacKuen:
-Address emotions role in politics as split into categories in relation to elections; anxiety and enthusiasm
-Anx-polit learning
-Enth-Campaign
Thesis: Votes are not just emotional, emotions help aid the voting process b/c they make people think
-Emotions are good for voting, they promote learning
Give an outline on Koopman:
-Victims of war will have some type of psych affects
-PTSD - halluc, impending stress, anxiety
-ASD - 2 days
Holocaust Victims:
Depression late in life
Dont talk about it
Jump into marriages
No emotion

-Effects of war on people/vets
psych effects/drugs
-Victims of terror suffer from PTSD as well
Give an outline for Suedfeld:
-Analysis of MST, Macro Stress Disorder - any event that severely discredits a person's view or normalcy
-Eustress - opp of stress
-Holocaust, bubonic plague
-Jews got jobs, got lives back pretty quickly
Outline Davis Chapts 1-2
9/11 changes everything
-purpose of book: theoritically grounded and systematic analyses of individual attitudes are required to delinate how feelings of threat and vulnerability influence trade-offs between CL and NS
-Lock vs. Hobbes

Bush policies
-Wire tapping
-Pat 1 and 2
2002 Trust drops
What people wanted 6 years ago much different than what people wanted 4 years ago
-Why trust decline? WMDs, nukes, etc...
Neg types of patriotism: blind, constructive, and symbolic
It is easier to talk people into a secure position than our of one.
Give an outline for Davis, chapters 3-4:
-Individual liberty and security should not clash, but democracy suffers when it does
-Looks at Dem principles in context, Strutter the guys and the socialists
-Not open to a free exchange of ideas, just like KKK
-Blacks, it could be argued, should give up a few CLs so they fit in w/ southern norms
What are 3 advantages to looking at a support in a context?
1) responses to CLs question may be susceptible to non-attitudes
2) Abstract-Applied problem, large gab because someone asked an abstract question w/o a reference point
3) Investigate connections between attitudes and behavior

Value trade off approach- ppl reason out of trade-offs under certain conditions:
Bush framing the nature of terrorism as a war by way of freedom and fear
Trade off measure - Habeaus Corpus, racial discrimination, etc...
-Most americans are not willing to make a wholesale concession to the gov't, although it depends on what CL is in question

4
Heightened sense of vulnerability existed before the attacks
Give an outline of Vertzburger:
-Yitzak Rabin
Unfreezing
Distraction
Differntial
Comm GT
False Hind
Bounce Back

All in all no long term affects with YR