Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
10 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Give an outline for Converse:
|
-Important and predictable differences in the ideological world
-These differences are easily overlooked -Thinks there are two sets of ideologues -Thinks people strive for consistency; dissonance -That ideology can be a heuristic -Involves ideological constraints -People aren't aware their thoughts are consistent unless they are of the elite class -Americans use little constraint; communist atheists, welfare low taxes |
|
Give an outline for Burden and Klostad:
|
-Party ID: An individuals affective orientation to a group in his environment
-Realized that initially they were asking a cognitive 'think' question, realized they should ask psych 'feel' question -developed a survey experiment and split ballot design, both have response latency especially for Reps -Response latency is based on people thinking things through -Found think = D feel = R -Huge implications just beginning to be known -Explains why the Rep electorate is so strong |
|
Give and outline of Conover and Feldman:
|
-Realize that lib/con IDs are important when determining votig behavior
-So longs as people are group members, they hold others either positively or neg E.g. Pro-capitalist, social controlists, against a change in quid pro quo would be positive to Reps -Results if one is a lib/con have 2 meanings: cognitive and evaluative -3 classes of variables, self ID, evaluative (thermo), and symbolic (issues) -For most people, party ID is central to them and is the most consistant political view a person will ever have -Symbolic<Eval<Self ID -lib/con ideology is heuristic -there is an overlap and they are related, but one does not predetermine the other |
|
Give an outline of Krosnick and Kinder:
|
-Used a theory for priming, the more media attention, more public is primed and therefore this needs to be evaluated into the overall issue judgment
-Results 3 fold 1)C.A. seen as more important 2)Increased priming is from media 3)Priming more pronounced in evaluations of RRs performance -Scandal weakens political support -In cases like IC, people forgo analysis for heuristics -3 considerations 1) PO and TV are related 2) Some people more priming susceptible than others 3)News coverage did not harm RRs character, just evaluation of his performance -Citizens hold RR differently pre vs. post IC -Priming says that this is attached to events and is highly influenced by the media -The dumbest citizens make priming more successful |
|
Give and outline for Marcus and MacKuen:
|
-Address emotions role in politics as split into categories in relation to elections; anxiety and enthusiasm
-Anx-polit learning -Enth-Campaign Thesis: Votes are not just emotional, emotions help aid the voting process b/c they make people think -Emotions are good for voting, they promote learning |
|
Give an outline on Koopman:
|
-Victims of war will have some type of psych affects
-PTSD - halluc, impending stress, anxiety -ASD - 2 days Holocaust Victims: Depression late in life Dont talk about it Jump into marriages No emotion -Effects of war on people/vets psych effects/drugs -Victims of terror suffer from PTSD as well |
|
Give an outline for Suedfeld:
|
-Analysis of MST, Macro Stress Disorder - any event that severely discredits a person's view or normalcy
-Eustress - opp of stress -Holocaust, bubonic plague -Jews got jobs, got lives back pretty quickly |
|
Outline Davis Chapts 1-2
|
9/11 changes everything
-purpose of book: theoritically grounded and systematic analyses of individual attitudes are required to delinate how feelings of threat and vulnerability influence trade-offs between CL and NS -Lock vs. Hobbes Bush policies -Wire tapping -Pat 1 and 2 2002 Trust drops What people wanted 6 years ago much different than what people wanted 4 years ago -Why trust decline? WMDs, nukes, etc... Neg types of patriotism: blind, constructive, and symbolic It is easier to talk people into a secure position than our of one. |
|
Give an outline for Davis, chapters 3-4:
|
-Individual liberty and security should not clash, but democracy suffers when it does
-Looks at Dem principles in context, Strutter the guys and the socialists -Not open to a free exchange of ideas, just like KKK -Blacks, it could be argued, should give up a few CLs so they fit in w/ southern norms What are 3 advantages to looking at a support in a context? 1) responses to CLs question may be susceptible to non-attitudes 2) Abstract-Applied problem, large gab because someone asked an abstract question w/o a reference point 3) Investigate connections between attitudes and behavior Value trade off approach- ppl reason out of trade-offs under certain conditions: Bush framing the nature of terrorism as a war by way of freedom and fear Trade off measure - Habeaus Corpus, racial discrimination, etc... -Most americans are not willing to make a wholesale concession to the gov't, although it depends on what CL is in question 4 Heightened sense of vulnerability existed before the attacks |
|
Give an outline of Vertzburger:
|
-Yitzak Rabin
Unfreezing Distraction Differntial Comm GT False Hind Bounce Back All in all no long term affects with YR |