• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/19

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

19 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Truman Doctrine
-Truman: Came in shortly after FDR's death
- No experience in IR, strong domestic policies, new deal democrat
-No knowledge of Yalta and Nuclear Weapons
-DOctrine would provide economic assistance to Greece and Turkey
-The world is facing 2 alternative choices of life: liberal democracy vs. communist totalitarianism.
-Seeds of totalitarianism nurtured by misery and want
-US's economic aid can help countries facing communist subversion
Marshall Plan
-European Recovery Plan proposed by US in 1947
--Most West Europeans welcomed
--Even some East European regimes interested at first

June 5 1947- Secretar of State George C. Marshall announced America would offer economic assistance for reconstruction of Western Europe (any state with Communist Subversion)

-Object of communist hostility
--Soviet veto of East European participation
--Communist Party of France
--Communist Party of Italy
NSC 68
1- To rising powers, US and SOviet Union
2- US's policy of containment can only succeed with strong military backing
3- "Deter Soviet Expansion and to defeat aggressive Soviet or Soviet-led actions of limited and total character"
4- Basically, put containment of communism into official action.

Expanding means to gain more ends
Asymmetrical
Containment Pre-NSC-68:
Limited Means Dictate Pursuit of Limited Ends
-Strongpoint defense: Concentrations on key areas of world
-Asymmetrical response to threat: concentrate on American strengths
-Reliance American atomic monopoly: Desire keep defense budget low
-Criticisms: Many areas neglected. Over reliance nuclear weapons for deterrence (credibility, little flexibility)
NEW LOOK: Background
-Debate about the costs of containment and implementation of NSC-68 during Korean War.
-Agony over indecisiveness: Remote area, limited means
-Domestic Debate over whether or not to expand the war: Bitter. Removal of General of the Army MacArthur
NEW LOOK: Eisenhower Administration Policy
-Many ways a continuation of Truman
-Shared some assumptions with NSC-68
-Examples: need to curb further communist gains, even in peripheral areas
-In other words, still perimeter defense of "Free World"
-However; asymmetrical approach: Wanted to regain initiative
NEW LOOK: Eisenhower Impact
-Committed to internationalist foreign policy
-Accepted 1952 Republican nomination in part to block isolationist and/or unilateralist candidates like Ohio Senator Robert Taft
-Concerned over means-end relationship
--Disliked parts of NSC-68: Large budgets. Social Regimentation
--Burden of containment had to be one the American people could/would bear over time
--THought military spending unproductive in peacetime.
-Product of a military background
-DId not want to undermine traditional values US wanted to preserve
NEW LOOK: John Foster Dulles
-Symbols commitment to bipartisanship in foreign policy: member delegation to Japanese peace
-However, felt Korea showed need for new approach to containment: regain initiative, disliked budget deficits.
-Differed from authors NSC-68 regarding Soviet willingness to risk war: though unlikely.
NEW LOOK: aspects
-Threat of "Massive retaliation"
- Alliances
-Psychological warfare
-Covert Operations
NEW LOOK: "Massive Retaliation"
-Implied an open willingness to threaten use of nuclear weapons. However, a convincing threat would eliminate the need to do so
-Tactical nuclear weapons were deployed in Europe beginning in 1953
NEW LOOK: Alliances
-Considerable number already conclude under Truman: EMphasis on war fighting
-Several more concluded: EMphasis on deterrence. Lesson of Korea.
-Need for US based in wartime: manned bombers of Strategic Air Command
-Allies could provide manpower to deal with local conflicts
"Massive Retaliation"
Credibility Problem
-Soviet Actions: Sputnik (1957), ICBM testing, Krushchev's boasts, etc.
-Doubts about American willingness to risk retaliation on behalf of allies
-Credibility of "extended deterrence" in doubt
-Cases where "Massive retaliation" seemed inappropriate: Indochina, Taiwan Straits, Berlin.
"Flexible Response"
New approach to Containment
CONTINUITIES
-Containment od communism still priority
-Necessary to avoid appearance of weakness

CHANGES
-Increase efficiency of use of resources (Secretary of defense Robert S. McNamara)
-Symmetrical: Threat met by comparable response
-Means-end relationship
-JFK thought Ike was too lethargic in COld War
-Ike was "too inflexible in pursuing possibilities for peace"
DETENTE: Factors pushing us towards policy
INTERNATIONAL
-Soviet achievement of nuclear strategic parity
-Need to avoid East-West confrontation
-Desire to negotiate end to Vietnam War
DOMESTIC
-Economic costs of "flexible response"
-Erosion od "Cold War consensus"
DETENTE: Nixon-Kissinger Approach
-No concern for reforming Soviet system
-Substantive negotiations with Soviets (Arms Control, trade)
-Containment by other means
-"Linkage"--Progess in one area of detente relationship tied to others
-wanted Soviet assistance in negotiating "honorable"exit from Vietnam
DETENTE: Aspects of Nixon-Kissinger Approach
-Concerns with "credibility" of US commitments. Wanted to avoid appearance of abandoning allies
-"Nixon Doctrine"- Bolster allies to defend selves. "Vietimization."
-Exploitation Sino-Soviet tensions
Nixon Doctrine
-Bolster allies to defend themselves
-"Vietnamization"
- phasing down American commitments in the world, reducing tensions.
- provide a "shield" if nuclear power threatens allies
- in case of threats on non-nuclear aggression, US will provide military and economic assistance to allies
Carter Doctrine
-Defense of Persian Gulf when Afghanistan was taken over by communists
-Scrambling for base rights
-New relationship with Pakistan (Despite nuclear program and human rights)

Use military force if necessary to defend itself in persian gulf region
Reagan Doctrine
- Convincing Gorbachev of that the Soviet Union had become what it sought to overthrow, and evil empire
- Use the forces of nationalism against the gains Soviet Union had made
-overt and covert aid to anti-communist forces and resistance movements