• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/53

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

53 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Components of federalism

-Geopolitical division


-Independence


-Direct governance

Federal State

One in which sovereignty is constitutionally split between at least two territorial levels so that independent governmental units at each level have final authority in at least one policy realm

Unitary Sates

States that are not federal

Devolution

When a unitary state grants powers to subnatiomal governments but retains the right to unilaterally recall or reshape those power

Congruent federalism

When the territorial units of a federal state share a similar demographic makeup with one another and the country as a whole

Incongruent federalism

When the demographic makeup of territorial units differ among the units and the country as a whole

Symmetric federalism

When the territorial units of a federal state possess equal powers relative to the central government

Asymmetric federalism

When some territorial units enjoy more extensive powers than others relative to the central government

Decentralization

The extent to which actual policymaking power lies with the central or regional government

Coming-together federalism

Separate units agree to give up part of their sovereignty to improve conditions

Holding-together federalism

The central government chooses to decentralized its power to subnatiomal governments to diffuse secessionist pressures

Advantages of federalism

-Closer match between policy and citizen preferences



-Greater government accountability by bringing the government closer to the people



-Competion among states creates an incentive for good government



-Policy experimentation



-System of checks and balances

Disadvantages of Federalism

-Unnecessary duplication and contradictory policies



-Increases collective action problems in policy formation



-Competition leads to downward harmonization



-Competition amplifies pre-existing inequalities



-Faciliates blame shifting and credit claiming, thereby reducing government accountability

Unicameral legislature

Legislative deliberation occurs in a single assembly

Bicameral legislature

Legislative deliberation occurs in two distinct assembly

Congruent bicameralism

When two legislative chambers have a similar poltical composition

Incongruent bicameralism

When two legislative chambers differ in poltical composition

Members of selecting the upper house in bicameralism

-Heredity


-Appointment


-Indirect elections


-Direct elections

Members of the lower house represent...

-All citizens equally

Members of the upper house represent...

-Subnational geographic units

Malapportionment

When the distribution of poltical representation between constituencies is not based on the size of each constituency's populations

Symmetric bicammeralism

When two legislative chambers have equal or near equal constitutional power

Asymmetric bicameralism

When two legislative chambers have unequal constitutional powers

Argument in favor of bicameralism in federal countries

-An institutional means for protecting the federal system and promoting the distinct preferences of different territorial units

Argument in favor of bicameralism in unitary countries

An institutional means for improving the quality of legislation

Constitutionalism

A commitment to be governed by a set of authoritative rules and principles that are laid out in a constitution

System of constitutional justice

Comprises the set of institutions and procedures that are established to protect constitutional rules and principles

Constitution

Provides the formal source of state authority

Codified constitution

One that is written in a single document

Uncodified constitution

One that has sevetal resoyrces, which may be written or unwritten

Entrenched constitutions

Can be modified only through a special procedure of constitutional amendment

Unentrenched constitution

Has no special amendment procedure and can be modified at any point in time with the support of a legislative majority

Legislative supremacy constitution

Has no constitutional review, has no bill of rights is not entrenched

Higher law constitution

Has constitutional review, has a bill of rights, and is entrenched

Constitutional review

The authority of an institution to invalidate legislation and other acts of the government that violate constitutional rules

Judicial review

When constitutional review is conducted by ordinary judges from the regular judicial system

New constitutionalism

A situation in which almost all countries now have a higher law constitution

Abstract review

The constitutional review of legislation in the absence of a concrete legal case

Concrete constitutional review

The constitutional review of legislation with respect to a specific to a special legal case

Priori constitutional review

Occurs before a law is enacted

Posteriori constitutional review

Occurs only after a law is formally enacted

Centralized constitutional review

-A situation in which only one court can conduct constitutional review



-European Model

-Decentralization constitutional review



-America model

A situation in which more than one court can interpret the constitution

Veto player theory

-Offers a way to think about poltical institutions in a consistent way across countries



-It conceptualizes the institutional structure of a given country in terms of its configuration of veto players

Veto player

An individual or collective actor whose agreement is necessary for a change in the poltical status quo

Institutional veto player

Generated by a country's constitution

Partisan veto player

Generated by the way the poltical game is played

Veto players with conflicting preferences are characterized by

-Greater policy stability



-Smaller policy shifts



-Less variation in the size of policy shifts



-Weaker agenda setting powers

Winset of the status quo

The set of alternatives that all veto players prefer to the status quo

Size of winset

-when winset is small:


Policy stability is high


Policy shifts frequency and sizs are small



-when winset is large:


Policy stability is low


Policy shifts frequency and size can be larger

Increase in the number of veto players

Can decrease the winset or leave it the same

Increasing ideological distance of veto players

Will decrease the size of winset

Unanimity core

Where the status quo would never be defeated