• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/100

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

100 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
public opinion
citizens attitudes about political issues, leaders ,institutions, and events

empirical
public behavior
the study of individual voter behavior (includes study of opinion, ideology, and political participation)
public opinion and representation
opinion --> office holders --> policy (elections to government)

your opinion who gets in office, who then determines policy

doesn't really get public opinion transferred to policy
political theory
normative
opinion constructed ...
beliefs + values = attitudes or opinions
beliefs
assumptions we make about how the world works
values
ideals (or beliefs) we hold to be important in our daily lives

rules about how society should be run, when talking about values
attitudes
a positive or negative feeling about a particular object

not directly observable, they are internal

visible when interacting
opinions
expression of attitudes
Machiavelli
Politics should be run by one person; power is important

Public opinion should be ignored, but managed by those in power
Hobbes, 1651
wrote Leviathan

politics is a social contract between man and government
- the government should act as a protection of the individual rights of man

public opinion can call for a creation or replace existing government
-people shouldn't have actual say, but if the government needs to be re-instated, the public should have that say
Locke, 1682
Treatises of Two Governments

politics should be based in the protection of individual liberties

public opinion gives legitimacy to government but must be checked
Mill, 1859
On Liberty

politics maximize the public good with-out hurting anyone

public opinion is the heart of the government in so much that tyranny is prevented
Rousseau, 1859
The Social Contract

politics should provide for the general will

public opinion is the organic will of the community; should be elevated to its highest forms
Aristotle, 350 BC
Politics (lectures)

Politics should be run on the concept of distributive justice
--participate more, than you should benefit the most

public opinion can be destructive, thus it should be only selectively listened to
Hegel
Politics is an expression of individuality and of self

public opinion should be a venue for expression and to alleviate social pressures

Belief in the collective will of the people
plato, 380 BC
The Republic

politics is run by philosopher - kings who understand politics

public opinion is useless. The public gets it wrong, so there's no need to listen to them at all
The founding fathers
we are a democratic republic
federalist papers
madison, hamilton, and ...

a defense of the consitution
defend it in terms of being ratified
christian beliefs --> wanted to protect Gods creations
- individual rights and freedoms
democrats and republicans
difference in individual rights and liberties
Federalist 10
Founders knew that Public Opinion could sway very easily
-government should not always change due to PO
-PO is sometimes wrong.
factions
form groups who have similar opinions
group that are bigger have more power
PROBLEM: could create a tyrannizing government AND minorities are easily ignored this way
Individuals don't have real power
part of the Federalist 10 (?)

no real say in what happens.
Power is directly removed from the people

-electoral college, State representatives, etc.
Post-Founding Theorist change
Normative to Empirical

what the world out to be, to how the public actually plays a role in the US
De Tocqueville, 1840
Democracy in America

observed the US in its early years
commented on the unusual nature of participatory politics

coming from France during the French revolution, US is ideal
-Town Hall meetins, people actually have a say
Lippman, 1922
Public Opinion

movement away from theory

public opinion is inconsistent

writes after WWI
-sees Public Opinion as the cause of the failure of the League of Nations

Looked at the psychology of opinion
-nothing in a persons brain that makes the politically inclined

public phantom
Gallup, 1940's
grandfather of the modern poll

people can rely on polling to serve democratic purpose (scientifically measure what the public is saying)

criticized current polling techniques - unscientific, very subjective

very influential in getting representatives to pay attention to the polls
-avenue of representation
Blumer and Rogers, 1948/9
skeptics of polls
questioned who and what polls measured

public is dumb, don't know much about politics
Fishkin, 1997
Moves beyond the purpose of a regular poll
Describes deliberative polling as the next frontier in public opinion
Fishkin's study
polled 600 people at a university
after they took a poll they discussed in small groups about the candidates and their opinions on the topics

post-polls results were different because people learn more from discussion
- people aren't politically knowledgeable, so they avoid political conversations --> stay dumb

we dont get political discussion opportunities without the town hall meetings, etc
How do we measure public opinion?
polls
vote
talking to representatives
IEM (Iowa Electronic Markets)
Straw Polls
1800's/1900's
method of determining popular sentiment by using unscientific methods
used it really just to sell newspapers by sensationalizing elections
Literary Digest Poll
1936
predicted that FDR would lose to Landon --> WRONG
was very well known for predicting presidential election, but methodology was bad
Need random samples to conduct a representative poll
Dewey vs. Truman election
1948
Gallup got it wrong as well, Newspapers printed that Dewey won based on exit polls
1940's methodology for measuring public opinion
academic research
Why are polls important?
check yourself
-others have an effect on you

avoid manipulation
-politicians take advantage of ability to manipulate

educate yourself
-info given from polls does influence the nation
Who conducts polls?
news media
candidates (find out where they should go, what they should talk about)
government organizations (IRS about cheating on taxes)
private companies
frivolous pollsters
How do we measure public opinion?
polls
vote
talking to representatives
IEM (Iowa Electronic Markets)
Benchmark studies
conducted by candidates
-asses performance
-dictates the tone and structure of campaigns
-timing is crucial - ask about name recognition, candidate evaluation in terms of other candidates in the race, etc
Straw Polls
1800's/1900's
method of determining popular sentiment by using unscientific methods
used it really just to sell newspapers by sensationalizing elections
trail heat studies
directly compare two candidates, often in their electability
Tracking studies
polls that are conducted on a near daily basis, very close to an election, to track changes in strategies for candidates
- what counties to campaign in more, etc
Literary Digest Poll
1936
predicted that FDR would lose to Landon --> WRONG
was very well known for predicting presidential election, but methodology was bad
Need random samples to conduct a representative poll
Dewey vs. Truman election
1948
Gallup got it wrong as well, Newspapers printed that Dewey won based on exit polls
1940's methodology for measuring public opinion
academic research
Why are polls important?
check yourself
-others have an effect on you

avoid manipulation
-politicians take advantage of ability to manipulate

educate yourself
-info given from polls does influence the nation
Who conducts polls?
news media
candidates (find out where they should go, what they should talk about)
government organizations (IRS about cheating on taxes)
private companies
frivolous pollsters
Benchmark studies
conducted by candidates
-asses performance
-dictates the tone and structure of campaigns
-timing is crucial - ask about name recognition, candidate evaluation in terms of other candidates in the race, etc
trail heat studies
directly compare two candidates, often in their electability
Tracking studies
polls that are conducted on a near daily basis, very close to an election, to track changes in strategies for candidates
- what counties to campaign in more, etc
panel studies
individuals are followed over time and polled on the same questions

individual opinion change over time
focus groups
respondents are given an opportunity to express their viewpoints in a small group
-recorded or observed unobtrusively
deliberative groups
respondents discuss a topic and then are polled on that topic
-learn from each other
exit polls
polls that are given upon exiting a voting precinct

can determine the outcome of the votes, news organizations will try and predict the winner before the actual votes are in
push polls
polls that are intended to change people's opinions rather than measure opinion

-pseudo poll
no science to it

influence public opinion

ex: Barack Obama eats babies. Will you vote for him in the 2012 election?
Sampling
the subset of respondents that a poll, survey, or study selects from broader population
representative
your sample can illustrate what is going on in the public
generalizability
if you have a scientific example than your sample can be generalized
probability sampling
every unit in the broader population has an equal chance of being selected

simple random sample
probability proportionate to size
stratified sampling
snowball sampling
simple-random-sample
easiest and most accurate
list of the entire population you are studying and select randomly

- complete lists don't exist, will be biased because some will be missing

- illegals, homeless, etc
probability-proportionate-to-size
draw your sample proportionality from the population based on the size
stratified sampling
sample a particular characteristic and make it proportionate (race, age, religion)
snowball sampling
do study, then as the person that you polled if they know anyone else who would be good for the survey (fit the criteria)
non-probability sampling
every unit in the broader population does not have an equal chance of being selected

convenience sampling
voluntary sampling
convenience sampling
population is available to researcher
NOT RANDOM

undergrads for grad student research
voluntary sampling
people volunteer to take a survey
Purposive Sampling
the researcher employs a subjective set of criteria to select the study's population

quota sampling
typical case sampling
simliar/dissimilar case sampling
quota sampling
include a distribution of a demographic region

fill a quote, want a particular amount of a particular demographic
typical case sampling
pick a particular person to sample of group of people depending on what you want to study
similar/dissimilar case sampling
pick cases that exemplify differences
pick specific people
Literary Digest Poll of 1936
presidential election FDR vs. Landon

the non-response rate was high!
only a small fraction of the people who were polled responded

not due to lack of representation (Also bad though, didn't include much of the poor, they didnt own cars, or in phone directory)
sampling size
the amount of people needed in the sample to make the sample representative

in the US need 1,000 people

1040 is ideal number for 300,000,000
sampling error
allows the investigator to estimate how far the results are from the total population

margin of error is +4/-4% of the true value of the sample
confidence interval
the likelihood that the values of the study will fall in the range given by the error

99% confidence interval is the best

if the margin of error is larger, than you need more people to sample
response rates
the percentage of people that respond to a poll or study

Telephone concern: not everyone has a landline now, cell phones aren't always in directories
weighing
segments of the sample may be more heavily accounted for, to take biases in account

- if you know you dont have enough of some demographic to make it representative, you can statistically give more attention to one person of that demographic
data collection
questionnaires
telephone surveys
interviews
internet
questionnaires
strengths: cost, training, no interviewer bias, privacy, visual aids

weaknesses: response rate are low (only 10%), clarification, who completes it? cognitive burden, time
telephone surveys
strengths: time, cost (cheaper than interviews), clarification

weakness: training, visual aids, interviewer bias, lack of candor(respondents are less forthcoming)
interviews
strengths: rich data, response rate, flexibility, level of candor is high (trust between participants)
internet
strengths: cost is low, time is fast, audio/visual aids are easy, data analysis is simplified

weakness: internet access is limited (only 80% of US have it), self-selection, lack of research
instrument effect
effect that coes from the question, poll, instrument, etc.
interviewer effect
effect that comes from the interviewer
-training can control for this

issue of reliability --> interviewer affect can cause a change in response from time 1 to time 2

also issue of race, gender
training enables use of consistent tone of voice and wording
micro-level opinion
study of opinions at the individual level; focusing on the cognitive processing of opinions
-opinion formation
--mostly from parents
-opinion stability
--what goes on in the brain to create opinions, not very stable opinions
-political knowledge
--not very high in US
political socialization
the process by which an individual learns their beliefs, values, attitudes, and opinions about political matters
stages of childhood development
preschool
early childhood
late childhood
adolescence
aspects of development
sophistication/knowledge
-what you now about politics

citizenship
-do children know how it is to be a part of the US

Analytic Ability
-at what poing are children taking in the info and analyzing
preschool
3 to 5 yrs old

acquistion of political knowledge begins
lack of sophistication in values
politics is conflated w/religion and authority
strong signs of nationalism

no analytical ability
preschool citizenship
see political figures having the same power/level as religious figures

only 10% recognize the president
60% recognize the flag
early childhood
6 to 9 yrs old

knowledge of politics is expanding quickly, but inaccuracies in what they know

concept of citizenship becomes more complex
-identify as a US citizen

analytic processes begin to form and take shape
early childhood citizenship
49% believe that it is better to vote for your party than the best candidate (analytical judgment)
--trying to be a good citizen, but dont know how
late childhood
10 to 12 yrs old

learn to correct inaccuracies in political knowledge

learn the ideals of citizenship and of what it is to be the best citizen

beging to be analytical and critical of government
- asses high level concepts, but very naive
--trusting of the government
--think govt will take care of them
late childhood citizenship/analytic ability
84% say govt knows whats best
54% think its okay to speak out against the govt
--TOO TRUSTING
Adolescence
13 to 18

political learning reaches its heigh
self-interset and concerned for the community
identify as citizens and able to identify rights of citizens

see shades of D and R

politicians are de-idolized
-criticize a lot more
-ideals about what it is to be American, follow the law, respectful still remains
socialization findings
empirical verification --> generalizations, very hard to verify (poor kids, may not respect authority as much, etc)

minorities and socialization--> AA usually wouldn't respect police as much due to police being racist, etc

Political Events
Agents of Socialization
forces or factors that are imperative and influence the learning of our political beliefs, values, attitude, and opinions
six agents of socialization
family, peers, genetics, education, marriage, media
socialization via family
takes place when parents transmit their opinions through
-exposure
-communication
-receptivity
the primacy principle (socialization via family)
what is learned first is learned best

family is the first exposure you have to politics
the structuring principle (socialization via family)
what is learned first structures later learning

family gets to you first it structures how you learn