• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/8

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

8 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Levin
Against Homosexuality/Same Sex Marriage.
Leads to unhappiness and is unnatural with no evolution; views it as a illness
cant have children isnt the right function shouldnt be allowed
protects children to keep away
Murphy
Just because something was/wasn’t evolved for a purpose doesn’t mean it’s moral/immoral or makes you happy (makes no sense patterns change) why are they unhappy?? Ex: certain minorities being unhappy earlier in time
Even if it wasn’t part of our evolutionary ordinance thanks to natural selection it’s ok
Jordan
Ok with homosexuality if its private but not same sex marriage
Its ok as long as it doesnt mess wtih ppls rights; its alright to discriminate because certain religions are against it
Sullivan
Marriage is not private
Organizations (catholic??) can still not give same sex marriages if it’s against their religion
Boonin
GENERATIONS CHANGE WHAT STANDARDS ARE (used to be anti mixed race marriages)
We may allow same sex marriage but require more out of them (accommodation/standards)
Jordan’s mixed race marriage analysis is flawed
Anti-same sex marriage laws discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation
If you take Jordan’s argument seriously wasn’t there public dilemma about integrating schools so if you take him seriously we shouldn’t have done that
Sometimes you have to go against what ppl like to make things more fair
Kennedy
L v. T You are not protected under right to privacy if it can create harm to you or the society.
Just because its “immoral” it cannot be illegal
O'Connor
L v. T You can discriminate against someone if it is reasonable (don’t hire a blind surgon)
Homosexuality as per se slander in Texas as slander in a crime (= protection)
Scalia
L v. T Homosexuality is not a fundamental right because it is not written in the constitution
Roe should be overturned because it’s against moral/criminal law “uncommonly silly” needs to overturn many laws