• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/3

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

3 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
What are Nielsen's premises concerning famine?
P1: neo-malthusian argument relies on the claim that we are nearing Earth's "carrying capacity"
P2: We are not nearing the Earth's carrying capacity
P3: Therefore we should not suspend redistributive efforts.
What are the four reasons that Nielsen thinks we are NOT nearing the Earth's carrying capacity.
we don't know the Earth's carrying capacity, we've got plenty of land, the land we used is used inefficiently, too many cash crops
Nielsen one major reason for famine is socio-economic conditions. What does he mean by that?
If a population can't afford to buy the food available then it faces famine, even when food is technically available