• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/8

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

8 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENT/paley's watchmaker argument
Human artifacts are products of intelligent design; they have a purpose.
2. The universe resembles these human artifacts.
3. Therefore: It is probable that the universe is a product of intelligent design, and has a purpose.
4. However, the universe is vastly more complex and gigantic than a human artifact is.
5. Therefore: There is probably a powerful and vastly intelligent designer who created the universe.
Paley's Watchmaker Argument
watch : watch maker :: universe : universe maker

He argues just as the function and complexity of a watch implies a watch-maker, so likewise the function and complexity of the universe implies the existence of a universe-maker.
Argument from Analogy
nondeductive inference in which one infers that a target object T has some characteristic on the ground that T is similar to some other object A (the analog) and A is known to possess that characteristic
Darwinian Objection
"Machine making machine"
The “who designed God objection”
Postulating the existence of God does not solve the problem of design, but merely transfers it up on level

i. If universe is wonderfully designed, surely God is even more so. If so, he must have a designer even more wonderful than He is.

ii. If God did not require a designer, then there is no reason why such a relatively less wonderful thing as the universe needed one.
The “broken watch objection”
The purpose of telling the time. You would conclude that the watch was
designed by an intelligent mind. Even if the watch was broken or
damaged you would still conclude that it had been designed by and
intelligent mind. Even if you could not understand all of its working
parts and how they functioned together you would still conclude that
it had been designed by an intelligent mind. There could be no
naturalistic explanation for the watch. Just as the existence of a
watch implies a watchmaker, so the existence of the world implies an
even greater designer - God.
The only universe objection
Objection: The watch (re universe) is only one possible form of many possible combinations and so is a chance event.
The “bad theology objection”
One knows nothing about the matter at all.