• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/7

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

7 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

List presupps of science unpack them

Laws of though - identity, non contradiction, excluded middle. Cannot be proven by science


Sense perception- science requires it. How do we know we are perceiving it correctly


Law of causality-


Uniform nature- gravity, orbit, assume constant. Laws of nature tell how should work, but cannot explain them.


Values- assumed, science can't progress without. Built on. Every body lieing.

If three metaphysical theories which do you like. Why

Dualsism


Material


Immaterial


Matthew 10:28 Jesus affirms


Christian


Life after death


Soul


Not easiest to believe


Ockhams razor


Interaction problem

Outline 3 arguements for dualism

Subjectivity-something immaterial about us. Can't define others experience exactly. Fairly persuavsive.


Qualia- exsperiences that we can't describe. Color taste smell. Not very persuavsive


Intentionality-aboutness of things that purely physical things can't think of. Threw mind

Outline logical problem of evil, tell why not big deal

God omni- benevolent potent and scient


Potent strength to prevent evil


Scient knowledge to stop evil


Benevolent desire to prevent evil


If God, no evil,


Evil,


No God.



2 problems. Just because desire, doesn't mean have to. Greater good. Also God can exist and evil can exist. Satan

2 naturalistic theories of moral objectivism. Key point. Positives. Weaknesses. Proponents

Ethical egoism- Ayn rand, easy, human nature, morally right to look out for you. Doesn't acknowledge self sacrifice. Jesus.


Utilitarianism- bentham and mill, also easy, best for society as whole. Bad, slavery. Also justice. Doing wrong things that no one sees.

Hobbes and locked differing views of social contract. Which is like US. Which is wisest.

Hobbes- monarchy, man inherently evil, needs absolute ruler, society elects ruler they believe will be best. He has final say laws, judgments, war. Corruption lose societies best interest.


Locke-ends with sorta democracy, liberal, people elect leader, leader must follow majority of people's wishs, if not get replaced.


US uses locked. Locked is wisest.

Which distributive justice do you prefer. Why. What distinguishes the three approaches.

Libertarianism- limit government


Socialism-government runs everything.


Welfare liberalism- anything in between.


I follow libertarianism. Government for people. Not every aspect of our life. Gives you property rights. Determine own Success.