• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/14

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

14 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
what are the the 3 main objectives of normative ethics?
1. develop a theory regarding the nature of moral rightness and wrongness
2. provide a system of general normative principles
3. how (morally) a person ought to live
give the 3 layers of philosophical inquires starting with the foundation
metaethics
normative
applied
explain ethical foundationalism
one ultimate criterion of moral conduct which we use to rank and organize any derivative moral principles
what are the conditions for moral principles following ethical foundationalism
1- they are derived from the FPM
2- are ranked accordingly to the FPM
-T / F

every normative theory of morality will argue for a different FPM
True
what is the "condition C" for Consequentalists?
producing the right consequences
what is the "condition C" for Deontological?
doing acts that are our moral duties
what is the "condition C" for virtue?
the agent having the right dispositions of character
what normative theory closely align with utilitariansim
Consequential Ethics
what normative theory closely align with deontological
Kantianism
what are the 3 requirements of a normative theory?
-authoritative
-complete
-consistent
what does it mean to be normatively authoritative
-whenever Theory T entails that you should (not) do act A, then it is actually true that you should (not) do act A
what does it mean to be normatively complete
-whenever it is actually true that you should (not) to do act A, then T tells you that you should (not) to do Act A
what does it mean to be normatively consistent
if Theory T does not say that you should do act A at some times and should not at other times based on arbitrary grounds