• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/24

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

24 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Lorenz curve
shows what percent of household owns what percent of gdp; it is below the line of perfect equality, therefore the bottom 20% of household gets about 10% of wealth
gini coefficient
measures inequality
the % between perfect equality and the lorenz curve
the higher the gini, the more inequality there is
the lower the gini, the less inequality there is

if high gdp and high gini, then rich well off and poor really badly off

can be misleading: if the rich have equal portion of GDP, then the gini is small, but this doesnt mean that the poor have the same percentage
stock
variable measured at one specific time
discrete
H20 in bath water at specific time
flow
look at over an interval of time

look at water coming into the bath and the water coming out of it
purchase power parity
uses the exchange rate of 2 countries to equalize the purchase power

its the number of goods/services that can be purchased with a unit of currency
--account for living and inflation rates, the PPP changes when there is inflation
the problems with PPP
there are non-tradeable goods like haircuts
a haircut in the US should cost the same as a haircut in india, but because our GDP is higher, then a haircut in the US more expensive
so absolute PPP doesnt really work

make it more relative
relative PPP
If inflation rates in canada rise, then the absolute difference between a haircut in canada and US will be higher, but their relative position to one another will not change
per capita
per head/ per person
capital
human made resources that are used to create goods and services
a factor of production
infrastructure, buildings, machines
goods and services
goods: anything
servicesL anyone wants or needs. duties for professional activity
GDP
price of how much a country spends on goods and services that are produced within that country

consumer + investment + government spending +value of exports MINUS imports

basically: it is everones private spending and the governments spending and the investments in capital minus the imports we get
production function
converts factors (inputs) into a commodity (outputs)

take: raw material, capital, physical capital, labor and turn it into some commodity
marginal productivity
least amount of inputs for an output

good thing
law of diminishing returns
as imput increases, the productivity rate will decrease
marginal production of labor
its how much you invest in teaching labor how to make outputs
want least amount, so that they will work the most

cant upset this balance though, then ppl wont work
relative growth rates
predicted v. the actual
savings
stock piling
high demand, have back up
give up current cash in order to benefit later
pay for storing
intercountry inequality
look at mean income

problem because there are countries whose populations are so huge, so there actual wealth per person is smaller--more unequal
International inequality
measure GDP/ capita: take population into account
this doesnt account for the inequality within the country--dosnt look at how the wealth is distributed
global inequality
take in all of the factors, very hard to find an effective measure of this
trends in international inequality (between country inequality)
general closing the gap, thanks in large part to china and india
without them, this would not be the case
trends with within-country inequality
increasing: there is bigger gaps between the poor and the rich in specific country
industrial revolution's effects on inequality
heightens inequality
absolute poverty
$1, $2 per day
doesnt take in inflation rates
$1/day in 1994 is not the same as in 2009, havent changed numbers yet