Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
54 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
TRAINING |
1. short term 2. specific skill acquisition 3. more immediately clear results |
|
DEVELOPMENT OR EDUCATION |
1. longer term 2. learning in which behavior, attitudes are changed 3. results more oriented toward open-mindedness
|
|
PREFERENCE TO TRAINING |
Psychologically, people tend to prefer training since we find comfort in predictability, certainty and status quo |
|
PADS - Acquisitions overlooked for SKAs |
We must first assess SKAs PROBLEM - You can teach people to do the job BUT you can't teach them to want to do it
|
|
ORG RESPONSES TO PERFORMANCE PROBLEMS #1 - Situation - Problem is insignificant |
ORG RESPONSE: ignore it
PERSONNEL ACTIVITY: none |
|
ORG RESPONSES TO PERFORMANCE PROBLEMS #2 - Situation - Selection criteria are inadequate |
ORG RESPONSE: increase attention to selection criteria
PERSONNEL ACTIVITY: job analysis
|
|
ORG RESPONSES TO PERFORMANCE PROBLEMS #3 - Situation - Employees are unaware of performance standards |
ORG RESPONSE: Set goals and standards and provide feedback
PERSONNEL ACTIVITY: Orientation, performance evaluation |
|
ORG RESPONSES TO PERFORMANCE PROBLEMS #4 - Situation - Employees have inadequate skills |
ORG RESPONSE: provide training
PERSONNEL ACTIVITY: training |
|
ORG RESPONSES TO PERFORMANCE PROBLEMS #5 -
Situation - Good performance is not rewarded; poor performance is not punished |
ORG RESPONSE: Provide rewards or punishments and connect them to performance
PERSONNEL ACTIVITY: Performance evaluation, disciplinary action |
|
STEPS TO TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT |
1. Training for current job, short term 2. Education for change in long-term 3. Staff development for group changes |
|
TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION - 1 OF 3 |
1. What are training needs? Needs assessments (general policies, performance, future needs)
2. Where in organization are needs? Study tasks by using SME's and current job descriptions |
|
TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION - 2 OF 3 |
3. Study the people you have
4. Convert goals into concrete behaviors wanted
|
|
TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION - 3 OF 3 |
5. Decide T&D methods to be used i.e. workshops, conferences, outside trainer
6. Assessment of T&D choices include: employee reactions, learning, behavior change, changes in productivity; cost effectiveness |
|
ISSUES IN ASSESSMENT - PRETEST/POSTTEST PROBLEMS - 1 OF 2 |
1. It is hard to test and expensive to test for validity of the pretest/posttest type
2. History - what has happened with the individual, the organization and work
3. Maturation - People learn naturally on the job (change over time)
4. Pretest Sensitization - Employees in a pretest pay the most attention to parts that are most emphasized |
|
ISSUES IN ASSESSMENT - PRETEST/POSTTEST PROBLEMS - 2 OF 2 |
5. Mortality after pretest-people leave the job or the organization so you can't compare their before/after results
6. Groups can be biased
7. Trainee differences
8. Changes in the environment |
|
WORKFORCE 2000 VS. 2010 |
People entering the workforce are more diverse and are lacking basic skills such as reading and math. They are older, there are more women, minorities and immigrants. Employer expenses are going up. |
|
WORKPLACE ORIENTATION AND MENTORING? |
Employees need to be oriented to organization as well as be taught SKAs. |
|
PROCESS THEORIES
EXAMPLES: EXPECTANCY & EQUITY |
More modern theories of motivation that look at HOW or the PROCESS
|
|
EXPECTANCY THEORY |
Workers ask themselves 3 questions: 1. Can I do the task? 2. What will I get if I do it? 3. How much is it worth to me?
They will adjust their job behaviors accordingly. |
|
EQUITY THEORY
input/outcomes = peer input/outcomes |
Workers tends to think in terms of work inputs ought to equal outcomes: 1. They are comparing themselves to peers and assessing peer input and outcomes 2. They will adjust their own work productivity accordingly to what they see peers getting for the same work.
|
|
CONTENT THEORIES OF MOTIVATION
|
Oldest theories of motivation and focus on What factors (things) encourage positive behavior. |
|
FEDERICK TAYLOR |
Scientific Management (Machine Model) One Best Way - for factory workers Motivated by pay and rest periods Led to ergonomics
|
|
HUMAN RELATIONS MOVEMENT = HAWTHORNE STUDIES |
Western Electric at Cicero near Chicago in 1920s-1930s We are social beings and want to belong |
|
HAWTHORNE EFFECTS |
2 NEW OBSERVATIONS: 1. People react to conditions, observation, environment, attention (Giving attention = harder worker. 2. People are affected by the social groups they work in (rate busters/slackers) |
|
PRODUCTIVITY? |
f(MXA) = Factor of Motivation x Ability |
|
MOTIVATION |
Willingness to engage in goal directed activity on a continuous basis. |
|
DOUGLAS MCGREGOR |
Theory X Manager - Believe workers are lazy and in turn dictate, coerce, punish and strictly oversee workers
Theory Y Manager - Believe workers are naturally curious and want to work; in turn give adequate training and resources, are available for consulting; let people do their jobs |
|
JOB ENRICHMENT |
Performance of the job itself is rewarding |
|
JOB ENLARGEMENT |
Same tedious tasks added to a worker's job |
|
DECENTRALIZATION |
Let people at lower levels make decisions |
|
PARTICIPATION BY EMPLOYEES |
MBO (Management by Objectives) - The employer and employee come together and lay out possible accomplishments and then the employee is later assessed in terms of how well h/she met those objectives. |
|
ABRAHAM MASLOW - HIERARCHY OF NEEDS |
What will motivate someone may not motivate someone else.
1. physiological or basic needs - survival 2. safety/security - in the workplace 3. social needs - want to belong (makes us human) 4. esteem - both self and respect of others 5. self actualization - development and use of their full abilities (rarely reached) |
|
FREDERICK HERZBERG |
Satisfiers (motivators) - intrinsic factors like content of work itself and challenges; feeling that something is learned or accomplished
Dissatisfiers (hygiene factors) - extrinsic - pay, title, rewards, safety (DON'T IGNORE) |
|
NORMATIVE THEORY VS. EMPIRICAL |
Normative - theory about how something is believed to be
Empirical - of the senses theory about how something is through touch, eye sight, hearing (aided or not) |
|
WHY IS IT SO HARD TO STUDY HUMANS? |
Researchers have beliefs as well as scientific skills. There have been many theories used to understand why people behave the way they do. |
|
PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS - CRITERIA |
1. job relatedness 2. reliability - inter-rater and over-time 3. validity - content, construct, criterion (empirical) 4. inoffensiveness 5. legality 6. differentiation |
|
PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS - PURPOSES |
1. communicate organization goals and objectives 2. motivate employees to improve their performance 3. distribute organization rewards fairly 4. conduct managerial research 5. provide for employee movement within the organization (promotion) |
|
PERSON-BASED METHODS |
DO NOT DO; rater compares employees against other employees or against some absolute standard
|
|
PROBLEMS WITH PERSON-BASED |
1. can't really measure (traits, personality, aptitudes, general intelligence) 2. low validity - not related to the job 3. can't specify uniform set of traits needed in a job 4. not reliable - different raters interpret traits differently 5. of little use to counsel |
|
PERFORMANCE-BASED METHOD |
job-related criteria; this type of evaluation generally meets job-relatedness although MUST be evaluated on what they are currently doing |
|
CONSIDERATIONS IN SELECTING CRITERIA & METHOD |
1. don't forget $, time and employer ability 2. identifying criteria - which evaluative dimensions should be used to measure performance (group or individual) 3. single or multiple criteria - depends of # of duties (deficient and contaminated) 4. weighting of criteria - some more important than others? 5. performance standards - use history/records of jobs 6. matching purpose to time - how often a year
|
|
RATER ISSUES |
1. Most people are comfortable with supervisor appraisals than with giving peer appraisals. Yet modern jobs required increased teamwork.
2. Raters tend to make global judgments of others; they tend to document rather than discover how well someone is performing.
|
|
HALO/HORN EFFECT |
rating of one behavior can color all other ratings
|
|
LENIENCY ERROR and Opposite STRICTNESS ERROR |
leniency - it's easiest to rate everybody above average |
|
CENTRAL TENDENCY |
rating everyone average |
|
PRIMACY BIAS |
FIRST rating on one factor colors all other factors |
|
CONTRAST ERROR |
1. there is a tendency to compare workers 2. comparisons of employees will over and underrate contrast if clear performance standards are not made |
|
LACK OF DIRECT KNOWLEDGE |
lacks knowledge of job tasks and performance to date |
|
INTER-RATER REALIABILITY |
use of multiple raters to reduce rater error and are trained to have common frame of reference |
|
REDUCING RATER ERROR |
1. raters receive job description, criteria for judging 2. raters are trained to have a common frame of reference 3. terms used on form are clear 4. raters have limited # of employees to appraise 5. use multiple raters |
|
TIPS FOR EMPLOYERS |
1. Have routine conversations with employees in addition to PA 2. Give adequate notice of appraisal and form used 3. Focus on strengths, behavior and 1-3 needed improvements 4. Encourage discussion and be honest 5. End on a positive note
|
|
TIPS FOR EMPLOYEES |
1. Seek suggestions from supervisors 2. Don't be defensive 3. Discuss goals and plan of action 4. Understand evaluation |
|
HOW TO AVOID LEGAL PROBLEMS WITH APPRAISALS |
1. Use job analysis and job description to develop appraisal forms 2. Use a behavior-oriented form 3. Give evaluators written instructions and train them 4. Record review of results with employee 5. Have employee sign and date |
|
BARS - BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALE |
Performance based appraisal format; highly quantitative yet specific; a range of performance standards for each job task developed and then statements are translated into numerical scores Benefits - clear behavior expectations, helps in motivation if employee helps create Costs - time and expense; best for easily measured tasks
|