• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/5

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

5 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

How does Lewis account for the problem of animal pain

animals are not capable of sin


neither deserve pain or be improved by it, it is outside the range of our knowledge


the appearance of divine cruelty in the animal kingdom is an illusion


the fact that something has live does not matter until sentience appears


higher animals have nervous systems similar to ours


distinguish sentience from consciousness


they would need to be aware of themselves and their memories


animal would not be able to understand that they are in pain


only that pain is talking place in the animal


also evil of the animal world comes from the fact that some animals live by destroying each other


satanic corruption


some higher animals do seem to have selfs


animals are immortal?


man are appointed by god to have dominion over beasts


self in these animals comes from man


certain animals may have an imortality not in themselves but in the immortality of their masters


beasts are subordinate to man destiny is related to his

love in Aristophanes

man and woman were originally together in one body until Zeus decided to cut them in half because they were too powerful


longed for their other half


love is our desire to be complete pursuit for wholeness


love is belonging and desire no separation


love does the best that can be done for the time being


love is connected to a force beyond human realm


emphasis on piety


being pious is same as being good



loves in Socrates

love is a lover of wisdom inbetween being wise and being ignorant


love is good and beautiful


love is being a lover


loving good things


desire for happiness and good things


one does not seek other half unless it is also good


love is beauty in body or soul


must desire immortality along with good


beauty of souls better than beauty of bodies


beauty of knowledge

Socrates and Aristophanes similarities

in both love is a desire for happiness in aristophanes because they are unhappy when they are apart desire to be whole/happy




in both love is a desire for goodness because in aristophanes they desire to be pious which is a desire to be good so that they can be one being again with their other half

Socrates and Aristophanes differences

in socrates love is the love of the beauty


in aristophanes it doesn't matter if they're beautiful or not they just had to be their other half




in aristophane love is the yearning to be whole so they wish to never be separated in socrates there is no longing to be whole they are ok with being separated they believe that love is the lover of wisdom love them because they make you more wise make you better not because they make you complete