Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
7 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Top down profiling |
Hazelwood and Douglas categorised offenders as organised( intelligent and employed and disorganised ( less social compentent and unemployed) |
|
|
Canter et al procedure |
Content analysis of 100 cases of serial killers from the USA. Third crime was analysed. |
|
|
Canter et al aim |
To the reliability of prgansied and disorganised typologies |
|
|
Canter results |
Twice as many disorganised as organised crime scenes were identified. 70% of cases the body was concealed and 75% of cases sexual activity occurred. All had an organised element, unable to distinguish so unreliable. |
|
|
Canter and heritage aim |
Identify a behaviour pattern from similarities between offences. |
|
|
Canter and heritage methodology |
Analysis on 66 sexual offences from various police forces commuted by 27 offenders. Analysed by Canters smallest space analysis. |
|
|
Canter and Heritage |
Five variables- Vaginal intercourse, no reaction to the victim, impersonal language, suprise attack, victims clothing disturbed. Five factor theory |
