Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
73 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
org. structure
|
framewor for dividig and assignin and coordinating work...how they are formaly divded groupd, and coordinated
|
|
how are jobs structured
|
1.work specialization
2.departmentalization 3.chain of command 4.span of control 5.centralization 6.formalization |
|
departmentalization groups
|
1.function
2.product 3.geography 4.process 5.customer |
|
work specialization
|
degree to which jobss are subdivided into little tasks to be moer efficient
|
|
fayol handout
|
belived that the practice of management was distinct from other org. functions
|
|
fayol's 14 principels of manageent
|
1.division of labor 12.stability of tenure
13.initative 14. espirt de corps 2.authority 3.disciplin 4.unity of command 5.' ' direction 6.subordinization of indidicual intrest 7.remuneration 8.centralization 9.centralization 10. scalar chain 11.equity |
|
line of authority
|
chain of commnand...person in charge because of thier position
|
|
chain of command
|
continuous line of authority from top to bottom...clarifies who reports to who
|
|
unity of command
|
only 1 person to report to
|
|
span of control
|
# of people a manager can control--4 and 8
|
|
span of control 2
|
are there alot of substutes--no manager neccessary
wider spans need less managers |
|
centralized
|
decesion making is centered at top single point...effecient but time consuming
|
|
decentralized
|
decesion making is spread through the org....puts more decesion at hear of work
|
|
formalization
|
degree to which jobs w/in org. are standardized...number of rules and regs.
|
|
high and low formaliztion
|
high standarization = high form
employee freedom = low form |
|
bureucracy
|
organized straight line, very efficient, lots of job specialization, functional depts, lots of rules, and centrlized decesino mkaking
|
|
simple structure
|
low formalization and centrlized...1 ceo wit not too many employees
|
|
matrix structure
|
combine function/ product structure together-->employee has conflicting duties from 2 bosses
|
|
benefits of matrix structure
|
more flexible org and globalization
|
|
mechanisitic model
|
lots of depts./ high formalization/ centralized/ like a machine very speicalized(larger org's)
|
|
organic model
|
low formalizatino/ info. networks, lots of paticipation
|
|
determinents of org. structure
|
1.size--larger push toward mechanistic
2.technology-type has impact 3.strategy 1st--then structure...but then structure can drive strategy |
|
3 dimension model
|
volatile, complex, capacity
|
|
voltility
|
stable enviroments---mechanistic
|
|
comlexity
|
how complex is industry
|
|
capacity
|
envirtoment you operate in...does it support growth?
|
|
innovation strategy
|
emphasizes intro of major new products
|
|
cost-minimization
|
lowest price guys(wal-mart)
|
|
immitation strategy
|
move into new market only after its proven to work
|
|
unit, mass, process(woodwar)
|
unit-1 item in single batches
mass-larger batches process-continuous process(oil pipe) |
|
definition of org. culture
|
can exsist and live on forever
|
|
characteristics of culture
|
1.innovation
2.attention to detail 3.outcome orientation 4.people orientation 5.team orientation 6.agressivness 7.stability |
|
core values
|
primary values that are accepted throughout the org
|
|
dominant culture
|
core values that are shared by a majority of the org members
|
|
subcultures
|
same core values but some that are unique to departments. sometimes they can support it, but soometimes they can work against it
|
|
what do strong cultures have?
|
1.low turnover
2.help manager decesions 3.cohesivness 4.substitue for having manager 5.older |
|
culture a liability?
|
1.mergers and acquisitions
2.change makes a barrier with culture 3.diversity |
|
who is driving force of culture
|
founders and they act as role model...lead people and share their vision with employees. managers help to set norms according to value system
|
|
what does stong culture do
|
increases behavioral consistency and be a substitute for formalization
|
|
socialization
|
adapt to org. culture
|
|
stages in socializaton process
|
1.prearrival-heard things befoer you work there
2.encounter-early part of working...whenyou hear things you may not like 3.metamorphosis-change employee attitude/behvaviort to fit |
|
means of transmitting culture
|
1.rituals
2.stories 3.language 4.symbols |
|
national culture
|
stronger than org. culture
|
|
institutionalization
|
when an org. takes a life of its own apart from its members
|
|
high ethical standards
|
to encourage
-management should be role models -management comm. about ethics |
|
what are commmon changes in org.
|
-tech-new computers
-econ-stock prices -social trends-trends in world -nature of work force-getting older/diverse/and -world politics-war, terroism |
|
change agents
|
persons who act as a catalyst and assume the resonsibilities for managing the change activities
|
|
consultants as change agents
|
bring in to help change the org.-more objective but dont have to live with changes
-if you brought in someone from the inside-biases |
|
what can resistance to change do?
|
can be positive and can help.maintains stability of behavior
|
|
conflict is good
|
sometimes
|
|
forms of resistance to change
|
1.overt-vocing complaints; very easy to deal with
2.covert(implicit)-keeping it inside and hard to deal with. increased absenteeism and decrease and loyality |
|
individual resistance to change -5
|
1.habit
2.security 3.econ. 4.fear of unknown 5.selective information |
|
org. resistance to change-5
|
1.structured inertia-dealing with it the same way as before
2.limited focus of change 3.group inertia 4.threat to expertise 5.threat to power |
|
lewins 3 step process of change
|
1.unfreezing-break it up(power)
2. change- change it 3.refreeze- put back together AND stabalize change |
|
do one or the other for change(lewin)
|
increase driving forces or decrease restraining forces
|
|
tactics for dealing with change-5
|
-education and comm.
-negotation -coopatation-let an adversary sit on decesion board\\ -manipulation-secretly try to change -force(coersion) |
|
politics in org.
|
chnage agents-any change can shake up poltiical groups
|
|
change agents and managers
|
managers already part of stucture won't be change agent---probably manger from fringe group
|
|
action research
|
change process, collects data, then decides based on data.benefit: focuses on problem
|
|
definition organization development
|
all of the planned changes or interventions and then tries to improve the org.
-participation -confrontatoin -respect -trust -power equality |
|
org. development - different ways it takes place
|
-sensitivity training
-process consultation -appreciatve inquiriy -surveys -team building -intergoup development |
|
sensitivity training
|
introduces more diversity and teaches sex harrasment
|
|
process consultation
|
brining in someone to deal with the problem
|
|
appreciative inquiry
|
identify strengths and weakness and then build off it
|
|
stress
|
dynamic condition in which an individual is confronted w/ an opportunity, contraint, or demand reated to what he/she desires and the outcome is uncertain
|
|
when moving from potential to acutal stress
|
high level of importance and uncertainty
|
|
3 things w/ stress
|
1.opportunity
2.demands-lose something you want 3.constraints-force you from doing what you want |
|
org. factors of stress-5
|
1.task demands of job
2.role demands in org. 3.interpersonal demands 4.org. stuc and leadership 5.org life stage |
|
personal factors of stress-3
|
1.family/personal
2.economic 3.personality problems |
|
enviromental factors of stress-4
|
1.econ uncertainties
2.poltical " 3.technolgical " 4.terroism |
|
3 consequneces of stress
|
1.pyhsiological-physical
2.psycholgical-anxiety 3.behavioral-absenteeism |
|
performance cycle
|
inverted u...moderate stress = high performance
|
|
how to deal with stress-4
|
1.time management
2.physcial exercise 3.relaxtion training 4.expand social support network |