• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/67

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

67 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Standing (constitution)
- Injury
* Personally suffers injury
* Likelihood of future harm

- Causation and redressability
* must be caused by D

- No 3rd party standing
* Close relationship
* 3rd party unlikely to sue
* organization on behalf of member

- Not as citizen or taxpayer other than establishment clause challenging government spending (not grant)
Mootness (constitution)
- Moot if the injury was remedied
- Exception
* capable of repetition and avoiding suit
* voluntary cessation and may repeat
* class action >= 1 member still injured
Ripeness (constitution)
- No advisory opinion

- Preemptive suit allowed only if:
* Undue hardship
* Issue and record fit for adjudication
Political Question
Not adjudicate if issue concerns:
- republican form of government
- President's decision re foreign affairs
- partisan gerrymandering
- impeachment and removal
Cases taken by Supreme Court
- Through certiorari
* State court cases
* Federal circuit court cases

- Through direct appeal
* Federal 3-judge district court cases

- Original and exclusive jurisdiction: state v. state

- No interlocutory review
US Supreme Court taking state cases
- Requires no independent state law ground of decision

Not take:
- state ground and federal ground
- reversing federal ground not changing result
Cases against state in federal court
- Federal court may not take: 11A
- Federal agencies may not take: 11A
- State court may not take: immunity

Exceptions
- Waiver (must be explicit)
- under fed laws enacted under S.5 of 14A
- federal government sues state

Sue state officials:
- Injunction
- Damages out of official's own pocket
- Not if state retroactively pays
Federal court abstainsion
- If state court proceeding is ongoing, not enjoining

- Has jurisdiction
- Not exercise
Organization's standing on behalf of members
- member must have standing
- germane to organization's purpose
- no involvement of member required for:
* litigation
* remedy
Federal legislative power
- Express authority in the constitution
- Necessary and proper under Art.1.S.8

- No general police power except:
* military
* indian reservations
* federal land and territory
* D.C.

- Tax and spending for general welfare
- Commerce power
* Channels
* Instrumentalities
* Persons and things
* Activities that burdens interstate commerce

Cumulative effect for burden:
- For economic activities
- Not for non-economic activities
Delegation of federal legislative power by Congress
- Generally allowed. May delegate to:
* Federal agencies
* Courts

- Standard (usually satisfied):
* Clear criteria
* Intelligent principle

- May not delegate executive power to:
* Congress
* Congressional officers
Bicameralism and presentation requirement
- Must go through both houses
- Must signed to law by President

- Line item veto unconstitutional
- Legislative veto unconstitutional
10A limit on federal legislative power
- No commandeering: not compel state to act or regulate

- May attach conditions to federal grants to induce the state to act

- May prevent harmful commercial activities by state government
14A S.5 power to legislate
- May not create new rights
- May not expand scope of existing rights
President's foreign affair powers
- Executive agreement and treaties
* Treaties requires Senate 2/3 consent
* Executive agreement does not
* Both prevails against state law
* Treaties prevails older federal law
* Neither prevails constitution

- War: President and Congress shares
* President is command in chief
* President may use US troops in foreign soil
* Congress declare war
* Congress raise army and navy
President's appointment and removal powers
- Appointment:
* ambassadors
* federal judges
* federal officers
- Senate consent required for appointments

- Congress may vest appoinment power for inferio officers in:
* President
* Head of department
* Federal Court

- Removals: if no limit by Congress, President may remove any federal officer

- Limits by congress allowed:
* If independence from President is preferred
* May not prohibit removals
* May limit to good cause removals
Impeachment and removal
- House of Rep: 1/2 - impeach
- Senate: 2/3 - remove

- Impeach and removal are different
- President, VP, federal officers, judges
- Treason, Bribery, crimes and misdemeanors
- S.Ct. chief justice preside Senate
President Pardon
- May pardon
* federal
* crimes

- Not impeachments
- Not state crimes
Executive privilege in communication
- There is privilege

- But trumped by other important interest such as the interest to produce evidence in criminal cases
President immunity
- Immunity to civil actions for acts in office

- No immunity for acts prior to presidency
- Even no adjournment of trial
Preemption (federalism)
Basis: Article III

- Express preemption

- Implied preemption
* Mutually exclusive
* State law impedes federal objective
* Congress' evident intent to preempt

- State law can have more stringent standard

- State law may not burden federal activity

- State may not tax federal activity
* no tax if coming out of treasury
* may tax federal employee's income
Dormant commerce clause
- Burdens interstate commerce
- Individuals and corporations may sue
- No need of facial discrimination
- Burdens out-staters

- If neutral & burden: benefit > cost

- If facial discrimination:
* Important government purpose
* Least restrictive means

- Exception: market participant
- Exception: Congress authorizes
Privileges and immunities (PI) re liberty and ability to earn living
- Requires facial discrimination
- Against out-staters
- Only individuals may use PI
- Only for liberty/ability to earn living
- Ability to enjoy (hobby) not included

- Standard:
* Important govermnet purpose
* Necessity (last restrictive means)
State taxation on interstate commerce
Must be:
- substantially connected to state
- proportional to in-state activity

- May not use tax to help in-state business
Rational basis review standard
The challenger must prove:
- There is no legitimate interest; or
- Law is not rationally related

- Any conceivable interest counts
- No need to be good or best
Intermediate scrutiny review standard
Government must prove:
- Important governmental interest
- Substantially related

- No need to be least restrictve means
- Must be narrowly tailored
- Must be good means
- May consider actual purpose
Strict scrutiny
Government must prove:
- Compelling government interest
- Necessary to achieve

- Must be least restrictive means
- Must be the best
- Only consider actual purpose
Bill of rights applicable to states
Through 14A due process

Exceptions:
- 2A gun rights
- 3A soldiers quartering
- 8A excessive fines
- 5A Grand Jury
- 7A Jury
State Actor (for protection of individual rights)
Only government actions are within:
- Due process
- Equal protection
- Fundamental rights
- Freedom of speech

Exceptions: Congress may enact laws under Constitutional authority to apply to private actors:
- 14A, S.5
- 13A, S.2
- Commerce Clause (Civil Rights Act)

Exception:

- Traditionally exclusive government functions (company town)

- Government entanglement (may request government to cease or private actor to conform):
* Gov. authorization
* Gov. leases to private business that discriminates

- Mere gov. grant is not entanglement
Procedural due process
- life, freedom, property
- goverment intentional/reckless act
- balancing test
* Importance of interest
* Ability to improve accuracy
* Administrative efficiency

Insufficient:
- government negligence
- goverment inaction without duty
Substantive due process (types)
- Takings

Article I/substantive due process:
- Not affecting existing contract
- No bill of attainder
- No ex post facto (criminal) law
Fundamental rights
Substantive due process (privacy)
- marry
- procreation
- use contraceptives
- keep family together
- custodian of child
- upbringing child
- abortion
- private homosexual activity
- right to refuse treatment
- no right to education
- no right to physician assisted suicide

Equal protection:
- right to travel (not foreign travel)
- right to vote
Abortion
Protected under substantive due process privacy

Standard:
- Not viable:
* cannot prohibit
* can regulate for women's health
* cannot affect ability to obtain abortion
- Viable
* may prohibit
* except to protect women's health

- No right to gov. subsidy of abortion

Notice and consent:
- Spouse: not pass scrutiny
- Parent for unmarried minor:
* Allowed
* With judicial determination exception
Equal Protection (Discrimination)
- Facial discrimination
- Facially neutral but with both:
* discriminatory intent
* discriminatory effect

- Standard determined by type
Discrimination based on race
Standard: strict Scrutiny

- affirmative action:
* No numerical set-off
* may take into account (a factor)
* may not numerical add points

Redrawing district based on race: strict scrutiny

Disrupting seniority system: not pass
Discrimination based on gender
Standard: intermediate scrutiny

Affirmative Action:
- allowed to remedy:
* different opportunities
* past discrimination
- not allowed if based on stereotype
Discrimination based on national origin
Standard: strict scrutiny

Rational basis:
- Congress' immigration law
- Self-regulated professions
- Democratic process

Intermediate scrutiny:
- Undocumented aliens
Discrimination of non-marital children
Standard: intermediate scrutiny

- not pass if no non-marital children is benefited

- pass if some non-marital children are benefited and some are denied benefit
Discrimination based on age
Rational basis standard
Discrimination based on disability
Rational basis standard
Discrimination based on wealth
Rational basis standard
Discrimination in economic regulations
rational basis standard
Discrimination based on sexual orientation
Rational basis
Fundamental right to travel
- Not pass strict scrutiny if refusing entry of out-staters

- No fundamental right to foreign travel

- Durational residency requirement for voting no more than 50 days
Fundamental right to vote
- One person one vote

- Redrawing district re population: strict scrutiny

- Partisan gerrymandering: political question

- At large election: allowed, unless with discriminatory intent

- Counting uncounted vote without standard: not pass
First amendment approach
- Content-based/content-neutral
* Viewpoint based
* Subject matter based

- Strict scrutiny for prior restraints

- Time, manner, place regulations
* Public forum
* Limited public forum
* Private forum

- Low value speech
* Inciting illegal activities
* Obscenity
* Commercial speech
* Defamation
* Privacy
First amendment - Prior restraints
Standard: strict scrutiny

- Procedurally proper court order:
* Must obey
* Lost right to challenge if disobey

- Court order to restrain media coverage to prevent prejudicial effect in the community: not pass SS

- Licensing requirement:
* Important reasons for licensing
* Criteria is so clear - no room of discretion

- Fees for public demonstration: not pass SS

- Vagueness and overbroad regulation: not pass
* E.g. fighting words
Symbolic speech
- need independent gov. interest to regulate
- impact must be no greater than necessary

- Pass SS to prohibit:
* Draftcard burning
* Cross burning to intimidate
* Nude dancing

- Not pass SS to prohibit:
* Flag burning (i.e. allowed)
* Cross burning (i.e. allowed)
Forum of speech
Public and limited public forum:
- Strict scrutiny for content-based
- Intermediate scrutiny for content-neutral
* Time, manner, place regulation
* Important gov. interest
* Narrowly tailored
* Leaving sufficient alternative forum

Private forum: rational basis; reasonable and viewpoint neutral
- Military base
- Prison front gate
- USPS sidewalk

No 1A right to access private property
Inciting illegal activity 1A
- Substantial likelihood of illegal activity
- Directed to cause illegal activity
Obscenity
Critera:
- Prurient interest
- Patently offensive
- Lack serious redeeming value

Child porn:
- prohibited if actual child
- May punish possession
- May not punish possession of adult porn

Zoning for adult bookstore/theatre: allowed

Gov. may seize assets of business that violate obscenity.

Profane words: allowed except
- Broadcasting
- School
Commercial speech
Prohibited if:
- False or deceptive
- Ad. of illegal activity

Truthful, nondeceptive:
- intermediate scrutiny
- complete ban: not pass

Prohibit misleading prof. ads.: allowed
- in-person solicitation:
* laywers
* accountants
- Trade name for professionals
Privacy interest in 1st amendment
- Not prohibit media report using information acquired from government source (publish id of criminal from trial record?)

- Media's use of tape illegally acquired:
* Public concern
* Media not participating in illegal activity

- Public has right to attend crim trial
- No right to attend for other trials
requirements for punishing associations
- Must be active member
- Must know the illegal purpose
- Must intend to further illegal purpose
Anti-discrimination for associations
- May require the associations not to discriminate against members

- Requiring to disclose members if chill association: strict scrutiny

- Not:
* Intimate relationship
* Expressive associations
Exercising clause (1A)
- General application, facially neutral:
* allowed
* if not general/neutral: strict scrutiny

- May not withdraw welfare for people who quit job due to religious reasons
Establishment clause (1A)
- Not discriminate one religion among many religions

Law involving religion pass if:
- Secular purpose of law
- Not advocating or prohibit
- No excessive government entanglement

- Grant to parochial school allowed if not for religious instructions

- Sponsored religious acitivty in public schoo: not pass

- No school prayer even if voluntary

- But religious students/groups must have access to school facility
Termination of social security disability benefit
Post-termination notice
Termination of welfare benefit
Notice and hearing
School discipline (due process)
Notice and opportunity to explain
Institutionalize child by parents (due process)
Neutral fact finder to determine relevant facts
Termination of custody (due process)
Notice and hearing
Civil conviction (due process)
Notice and hearing
Prejudgment goverment attachment or seizure (due process)
notice and hearing
Punitive damages (due process)
- Must give jury instructions
- Must have judicial reviews

- Excessive punitive damages: not due process
Local or state regulation impairs existing contract
- Private contract: intermediate scrutiny
* Substantially burdens existing K
* Important gov. interest
* Narrowly tailored regulations

- Government contract: strict scrutiny
Presumption that marital husband has custody of non-biological child
- Valid for fundamental right privacy