Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
24 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Schenck v U.S.
|
Schenck passed leaflets against the war. Freedom of speech unless there is a clear and present danger.
|
|
Brandenburg v Ohio
|
He led kkk speech. Cant regulate speech unless it has lawless action.
|
|
Tinker v Des Moines
|
Armbands against war. They are protected, but school officials can regulate.
|
|
Texas v Johnson
|
Flag burning; gov can't prohibit expression of an idea because society is offended
|
|
Miller v California
|
advertised porn; not protected by 1st amendment
|
|
New York Times v U.S.
|
Reaffirms prior restraint, no censorship in press.
|
|
Engel v Vitale
|
Outlaw school prayer
|
|
Abington School District v Schempp
|
Outlaw bible reading
|
|
Reynolds v U.S.
|
Religious practices are not superior to law
|
|
Lemon v Kurtzman
|
3 prong lemon test, rules for religion
|
|
Weeks v U.S.
|
Exclusionary rule- evidence found illegally is excluded from the case
|
|
U.S. v Leon
|
Good faith policy for the police
|
|
Miranda v AZ
|
Must be informed of rights. Freedom from self incrimination
|
|
Roper v Simmons
|
No executing minors
|
|
Griswold v Connecticut
|
Established rights to privacy (use of contraceptives)
|
|
Roe v Wade
|
A woman can have an abortion within the 1st trimester.
|
|
Planned Parenthood of SE Penn. v Casey
|
Can't restrict abortion with an undue burden
|
|
Plessy v Ferguson
|
Separate but equal legal
|
|
Brown v Bd. of Ed. of Topeka, KN
|
Separate but equal unconstitutional
|
|
Regents Univ. of California v Bakke
|
Quotas are unconstitutional, but race can be a factor for admissions process
|
|
Adarand v Pena
|
Strict scrutiny to law, narrowly tailored, serve compelling interest
|
|
Gitlow v New York
|
Federalize Free speech
|
|
Near v Minnesota
|
No prior restraint (censorship)
|
|
Gideon v Wainwright
|
Federalizes right to lawyer
|