• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/19

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

19 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Why do the majority of scholars hold to Marcan Priority?
Because Mark is shorter and more primitive
Was Marcan Priority ever advocated by the early church?
No
What two documents are involved in the 2-source hypothesis?
1. Q
2. Mark
What does Q stand for?
Quelle
What does "Quelle" mean?
It is German for "source" document
What does Quelle account for?
250 verses in Matthew and Luke
What is the one piece of evidence that supports Quelle?
Eusebius quotes Papias, who wrote that Matthew wrote the sayings of Jesus in the Hebrew dialect and everyone translated them the best they could
What does the quote from Papias suggest?
Matthew wrote down notes of Jesus' teachings
Is the existence of Q problematic?
Not if it is suggesting it is just Matthew's notes
What were these two sources (Q and Mark) used to write?
Matthew and Luke
What did Q have to be brought in to explain?
The times when Matthew and Luke agree with each other but not with Mark
What is the Oxford Hypothesis?
a 4-source hypothesis which swept the critical scholars. It is the most popular hypothesis today among New Testament scholars
What are the three hypothetical documents of the 4-source hypothesis?
1. L
2. Q
3. Proto-Luke
What is Proto-Luke?
It says that Luke draws on L and Q to create Proto-Luke
What is L?
L is the information that is specific only to Luke
What does Matthew draw on?
1. M
2. Mark
3. Q
What is M?
M is the information specific only to Matthew
What makes Primacy of Mark different?
It argues that Mark was the first gospel and the other two are just Mark plus additions by the church. This would deny the virgin birth and resurrection
What are the flaws of Marcan prority?
1. It has no early church support
2. It's a circular argument in which we are creating sources to fill a need with little to no evidence
3. If Matthew is first, this argument becomes unnecessary