Negligence -Torts

Front 1

Donoghue v Stevenson

Back 1

Opaque bottle

Front 2

Palsgraf v Long Island

Back 2

Train - Fireworks

Front 3

Home Office v Dorset Yacht

Back 3

Borstal Officers Island

Front 4

Anns v Merton LBC

Back 4

2 stage test

Front 5

Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire

Back 5

Police not finding murderer

Front 6

Couch v A-G

Back 6

William Bell, NZSC2008 case

Front 7

Bourhill v Young

Back 7

Pregnant lady dead guy

Front 8

McLoughlin v O’Brian

Back 8

immediate aftermath

Front 9

Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire

Back 9

Family of people crushed hillsborough

Front 10

White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire

Back 10

Police officers that helped in hillsborough

Front 11

Chadwick v British Transport Commission (as discussed in other cases)

Back 11

Train, risk of personal injury rescuer.

Front 12

Page v Smith

Back 12

Small crash, mental injury

Front 13

Van Soest v Residual Health Management

Back 13

Negligent doctor

Front 14

Coates v Government Insurance Office of NSW (as discussed in other cases)

Back 14

Informed of fathers death, did not see it. Technology, telephone. Kirby P If courts are to maintain that the requirement for damages is proof of a recognisable psychiatric illness, the existence of that condition is what should matter not the classification of the initial reaction or catalyst.

Front 15

Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks

Back 15

Unexpected flood burst pipe, reasonable?

Front 16

US v Carroll Towing

Back 16

Anna C sunk, no bargee.

Front 17

Watt v Hertfordshire CC

Back 17

Firefighters jack not tied down, he died WATT?

Front 18

Bolton v Stone

Back 18

Cricket match

Front 19

Wagon Mound (No 2)

Back 19

Oil leak

Front 20

Goldman v Hargrave

Back 20

Guy who cbf felling tree.

Front 21

Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council

Back 21

Dumbass who jumped into shallow mere

Front 22

Nettleship v Weston

Back 22

leaner driver UK approach
Incompentent best is not good enough

Front 23

Cook v Cook

Back 23

Aus approach to learner drivers
Voluntarily accepted risk

Front 24

Bolam v Friern Hospital

Back 24

higher standard, doctor reasonable body of medics

Front 25

ter Neuzen v Korn

Back 25

reasonable body of medics
all cutting corners doesnt allow individuals to cut corner.

AI HIV

Front 26

Scott v London and St Katherine Docks

Back 26

Res Ipsa Loquitor. In ordinary course of things.

Front 27

Hawke’s Bay Motor Co Ltd v Russell

Back 27

Res Ipsa loquitor driver case

Front 28

Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital

Back 28

'But for' starts. food poisoning vs arsenic poisoning

Front 29

Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services

Back 29

Abestos

Front 30

Bonnington Castings Ltd v Wardlaw (as discussed in the other cases)

Back 30

guilty and innocent dust

Front 31

McGhee v National Coal Board (as discussed in the other cases)

Back 31

brick kiln no showers

Front 32

Chester v Afshar

Back 32

1-2% failure to warn.

Front 33

Gregg v Scott

Back 33

loss of chance

Front 34

Re Polemis (as discussed in the other cases)

Back 34

small negligence, huge unforeseeable consequences.

Front 35

Wagon Mound (No 1)

Back 35

Welders

Front 36

Hughes v Lord Advocate

Back 36

kids burnt

Front 37

Jolley v Sutton London BC

Back 37

childs play boat

Front 38

Stephenson v Waite Tileman

Back 38

frayed wire huge extent

Front 39

Smith v Leech Brain (as discussed in the other cases)

Back 39

burnt lip huge consequences

Front 40

Tremain v Pike (as discussed in the other cases)

Back 40

rat urine. kind of injury not foreseeable

Front 41

Lamb v London Borough of Camden

Back 41

squatters while sge was away

Front 42

Smith and others v Littlewoods Organisation Ltd

Back 42

fire damage. kids cinema.

Front 43

Haynes v Harwood (referred to in other cases)

Back 43

horse drawn van. rock.

Front 44

Attorney-General of the British Virgin Islands v Hartwell

Back 44

gun rampage.

Front 45

Mitchell v Glasgow City Council

Back 45

murder cuty councils placement.