• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/72

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

72 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Fourth Amendment Challenges - Standing

D must have standing to assert claim

Fourth Amendment - Exclusionary Rule

Prevents introduction at a subsequent criminal trial of evidence unlawfully seized

Fourth Amendment - Government Conduct

Publicly paid police, private person directed by police or deputized private police

Fourth Amendment - Reasonable Expectation of Privacy

applies to place searched or item seized

Arrest - Definition

Unreasonable seizure of persons

Seizure - Definition

Seizure occurs when police by use of physical force/show of authority terminate or restrain freedom of movement and D actually submits

Seizure - Totality of Circumstances

If police intent to restrain is ambiguous, or


D's submission is only passive acquiescence,




Seizure occurs if totality of circumstnaces would lead reasonable person to believe not free to leave

Stop and Frisk - Definition

Temporary detention that constitutes seizure if officer by physical force or show of authority has in some way restrained (physical or order to stop) liberty of citizen

Warrant - Arrest

Must be issued by neutral/detached magistrate upon finding of probable cause and describe with particularity the D and the crime

Deficient Warrant

Does not invalidate arrest as long as there was probable cause

Warrant - Search

Issued by magistrate upon finding of PC, supported by oath or affidavit, describe with particularity




Reasonable belief that contraband will be found

Warrant - Facts supporting probable cause

Officer's personal observations


Information from reliable, known informant or verified unknown informant


Evidence seized during stop and based on reasonable suspicion, discovered in plain view, or during consensual search

Warrant - Particularity

Must specify place to be searched and objects to be seized

Knock and announce rule

Police must generally announce purpose when executing a warrant (unless state allows exception for exigent circumstances)




Violation does not trigger exclusionary rule

Warrantless arrest

Arrest warrant not needed in public place or for felony/misdemeanor in arresting party's presence




Invalid arrest alone not a defense to crime charged (but will affect seizure of evidence)

Reasonable expectation of privacy - home, private room, office

Use of imaging devices not used by general public is a search



Use of drug-sniffing dog is a search if on constitutionally protected property



REP - Luggage

REP for invasive searches but not for canine sniff

REP - automobiles

Reasonable suspicion for stop


Probable cause for pretextual stops when traffic law vioalted to investigate whether another law has been violated

REP - open areas

Outside curtilage - no reasonable expectation of privacy

REP - odor from car

No REP

Search incident to lawful arrest

Must be reasonable in scope and incident to lawful arrest

Search incident to lawful arrest - wingspan

Contemporaneous search of person/immediate surrounding area including pockets/containers

Search incident to lawful arrest - home

Closets/other spaces adjoining place of arrest in home where attack likely

Search incident to lawful arrest - vehicle

Arrestee within reaching distance of glove compartment during search or reasonable that evidence might be in vehicle

Exigent Circumstances - Hot Pursuit

Can seize "mere" evidence (not fruits/instrumentalities of crime) from private building if they have PC to believe D guilty of felony

Exigent Circumstances - Emergency

Reasonable apprehension that delay in getting warrant would result in immediate danger of evidence destruction, police/public safety or fleeing felon

Stop and Frisk - Stop

Reasonable suspicion, based on articulable facts that detainees involved in criminal activity, and is a limited/temporary intrusion on D's freedom of movement

Stop and frisk - Frisk

Under "plain feel" exception, if officer feels object whose identity is immediately obvious, it can be seized


Stop and frisk - passenger compartment

If police have reasonable belief suspect is dangerous to get control of weapons. Search limited to hiding places

Stop and frisk - Limitations

Least intrusive means reasonable available to frisk for weapons only

Automobile exception

Can search any part of car if PC that it contains contraband or evidence of crime

Plain view in public

No REP

Plain view in private

If officer on premises for lawful purposes and the criminal nature of item is imediately apparent

Third party consent to search

Can consent to own property search, but D's property only if agency relationship to D or D assumes the risk of search when giving right to third party to consent to search

Warrant authorizing wiretapping

Limited period of time


PC crime about to be committed


Identify persons and describe particular conversations


When to terminate tapping


Reveal intercepted conversation to court

Standing to object

Legitimate expectation of privacy with regard to search

Exclusionary rule - fruit of the poisonous tree

Applies not only to evidence initially seized as a result of government illegality but also to secondary derivative evidence resulting from primary taint

Exclusionary rule - exceptions

Inevitable discovery


Independent source


Attenuation


Good faith


Isolated police negligence


Knock and announce


In court ID

Fifth Amendment Self-incrimination - Rule

No person shall be compelled in criminal case to testify against himself

Self-incrimination - Testimonial Evidence Only

Non-testimonial, physical evidence not protected

Self-incrimination - Proceedings

Applies to civil/criminal, formal/informal proceedings if answers proide reasonable possibility of incriminating D in future criminal proceeding

Fifth amendment waiving privilege

D waives by taking the stand and answering prosecution's questions, witness waives it by disclosing self-incriminating information in response to specific question

Police interrogation

Any incriminating statement obtained as result of custodial interrogation may not be used against suspect at subsequent trial unless police inform subject of MIRANDA rights

Fifth amendment right to counsel

D must make a specific, unambiguous statement asserting his desire to have counsel present



Once invoked, all interrogation must stop until counsel is present, unless D voluntarily initiates communication with police OR 14-day break in custody and fresh MIRANDA warnings given

Fifth amendment exceptions

Public safety


Routine booking questions


Undercover police


Waiver - knowingly, voluntarily, intelligently waive right (silence not sufficient)

Tainted confession

Giving Miranda warning removes taint of prior Miranda violation


Second confession inadmissible if circumstances make it clear police approach was intentional attempt to circumvent Miranda

Fifth Amendment - Trial

D can refuse to testify at criminal trial or other proceedings that might incriminating him in future criminal proceedings

Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel

All critical stages of prosecution, regardless of whether specifically asked




Right to refuse counsel

Blockburger Test

Two different crimes in one criminal transaction deemed to be same offense unless each offense requires proof of an element that the other does not

Sixth amendment vs Miranda comparison

Unlike Miranda, presence of counsel only applies to interrogations about offense charged; like Miranda, D may make knowing/voluntary waiver of right

Remedies to Denial of Counsel - Trial Proceeding

D's conviction automatically reversed even without specific showing of unfairness

Remedies to Denial of Counsel - Guilty plea

D has right to withdraw it and can't be used against him as an admission

Remedies to Denial of Counsel - non-trial proceeding

Harmless error analysis

Remedies to Denial of Counsel - Informants

Post-indictment statement ot informant where situation likely to induce D to incriminate himself without counsel inadmissible

Remedies to Denial of Counsel - Exclusionary Rule

Fruits of poisonous tree doctirne applies to statements and physical evidence obtained as result of violation

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Reasonable competence presumed




but


Counsel's representation fell below objective standard of reasonableness, and


Cousnel's deficient performance prejudiced D, resulting in unfair/unreliable outcome




Mere inexperience not enough

Preliminary hearings

Must be held within 48 hours to determine PC




Fourth amendment guarantees D right to be released if no PC




No remedy if detention is unlawful other than exclusion of evidence

Bail

No constitutional right to bail, but denial of or excessive bail must comply with Due Process

Competency

D must comprehend nature of proceedings against him and have ability to consult with lawyer with reasonable degree of rational understanding

Grand juries

D has nor ight to present/confront witnesses or introduce evidence, and no dismissal due to procedural defect unless substantial impact on decision to indict

State's duty to disclose

AFfirmative duty to disclose any material evidence favorable to D and relevant to prosecution's case in chief that would negate guilt or diminish culpability




Failure is grounds for reversal

Right to jury

Federal - 6th amendment; State - 14th amendment for serious criminal offenses

Guilty pleas

Must be intelligent and voluntary and made in presence of judge


Judge must advise D


D can attack plea for ineffective assistance of counsel or lack of jurisdiction


Judge can reject plea

Speedy trial

Due process - protects pre-accusation delay


Sixth Amendment - protects post-accusation delay; time starts at time of arrest


Balancing test

Right to Confrontation

Accused has right to cross-examine adverse witnesses and be present at any stage of trial

Admission of confession by non-testifying co-D at joint trial

violates sixth amendment

Permissive presumption

Regarding element of offense, not violation unless it is irrational

Mandatory presumption

Violation of due process

Criminal standard

Proof beyond a reasonable doubt, all elements

Double jeopardy

Protects against second prosecution for same offense after acquittal/conviction and against multiple punishments for the same offense

Double jeopardy - same offense

Blockburger test - generally bars successive prosecutions for greater/lesser included offenses unless jeopardy attaches to lesser-included offense before event necessary for greater offense

Convictions post-trial

D can attack conviction after unsuccessful appeal under writ of habeas corpus