• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/108

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

108 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Definition of contract
A legally enforceable promise between parties with mutual obligations.
When does the UCC art 2 apply?
When the K is for the sale of goods.
Merchant
One who regularly deals in goods of the kind sold or by his profession holds himself out as having special knowledge/skills
Types of contracts
Express - language
Implied in fact - conduct
Quasi-contract (not K, equity)
Types of acceptace
Bilateral - mutual promises
Unilateral - by performance
Modern - uni only where offeror indicates completion by performance only manner of accept; where offer to public (ie reward)
Void K
Without any legal effect from the beginning; no enforcement by either party
Voidable K
One or both parties may elect to avoid K
Unenforceable K
Agreement otherwise vaid but due to an extraneous defense (ie SOF or SOL) is unenforceable
Creation of a K questions
Mutual assent?
Consideration?
Any defenses?
How mutual assent determined
Objective - did words or conduct manfirest present intention?
Offer?
Promise, undertaking, or commitment with definite and certain terms communicated to offeree
For communication to be an offer...
it must create a resonable expectation, thus:
not I would consider; I quote
Use of publications, advertisiements generally solicitation or invitation for offer
Definite and certain terms...
Whether enough of the essential terms have been provided so that a K w/ them would be capable of being enforced
Essential terms of an offer
Id of offeree
Definiteness of subject matter
Communication to offeree
Term requirements for specific types of contracts
Real estate - id land and state price
Goods - quantity (exception: requirements contract)
Services - nature of work
Requirements K
Impermissible tender or demand for quantity unreasonably disproportionate
Missing terms
Do not prevent formation if it appears parties intended to make a K and reasonably certain basis for remedy. Art 2 - reasonable terms can be supplied
Vague terms
Court cannot presume parties' intent, but can be cured by part performance that clarifies vague term or acceptance of full performance
Terms agreed on later
If material, offer too uncertain
Termination of offer by offeror
Revocation
Revocation
Effective when received or published
Limitations on revocation
Option - consideration for a promise
Merchant's firm offer
Detrimental Reliance
Part Performance (unilateral)
Part Performance (bilateral)
Merchant's firm offer rule
If merchant
Offers to sell goods in a signed writing
And the writing gives assurances that it will be held open
Offer irrvocable during time stated, or if not stated, for no more than 3 months
Termination of offer by offeree
Rejection
Lapse of Time
Termination by operation of law
Death
Destrcution of K's SM
Supervening illegality
Rejection
Either express or by counteroffer
Distinguish mere inquiry
Effective when received
Rejecting option offer does not reject unless offeror DRies on rejection
Acceptance of offer for UK
Completion of performance, notice of completion unless offeror waived or completion comes to offeror's attention
Acceptance of offer of BK
Either by promise to perform or beginning of performance
Shipment of nonconforming goods
Acts as an acceptance and simultaneous breach of K unless seller sends goods as an accommodation. Buyer must accept or reject ALL of goods shipped.
Accommodation trap
Watch out where seller accepts by promising to ship, then discovers lack of specified goods and ships nonconforming goods as accommodation -- this is BREACH as accommodation NOT POSSIBLE
Revocation
Effective when received or published
Limitations on revocation
Option - consideration for a promise
Merchant's firm offer
Detrimental Reliance
Part Performance (unilateral)
Part Performance (bilateral)
Merchant's firm offer rule
If merchant
Offers to sell goods in a signed writing
And the writing gives assurances that it will be held open
Offer irrvocable during time stated, or if not stated, for no more than 3 months
Termination of offer by offeree
Rejection
Lapse of Time
Termination by operation of law
Death
Destrcution of K's SM
Supervening illegality
Rejection
Either express or by counteroffer
Distinguish mere inquiry
Effective when received
Rejecting option offer does not reject unless offeror DRies on rejection
Acceptance of offer for UK
Completion of performance, notice of completion unless offeror waived or completion comes to offeror's attention
Acceptance of offer of BK
Either by promise to perform or beginning of performance
Shipment of nonconforming goods
Acts as an acceptance and simultaneous breach of K unless seller sends goods as an accommodation. Buyer must accept or reject ALL of goods shipped.
Accommodation trap
Watch out where seller accepts by promising to ship, then discovers lack of specified goods and ships nonconforming goods as accommodation -- this is BREACH as accommodation NOT POSSIBLE
Battle of the forms
Proposal of additional or different terms by offeree does not act as rejection/counteroffer but is effective as an acceptance unless acceptance expressly made condition on assent to teh additional or different terms
Mailbox rule
Offeree sends A then R:
K if A first then R, no K if R and DR then A
Offeree sends R then A:
Offeror sends offer, then revocation
K if offeree sends acceptance before receiving revocation
No K if receives revocation before sending acceptance
Mailbox rule and option K
Acceptance under an option K is effective upon receipt
Elements of consideration
bargained for exchange
bargain must be considered of legal value - either a benefit to promisor or detriment to promisee
Gift consideration
No bargain involved, but a benefit need not be economic
Past/Moral Consideration
Does not satisfy bargain requirement, EXCEPT:
- where a new promise is made in writing OR is partially performed
- if a poast act benefited the promisor and was performed by the promisee at the promisor's request or in response to an emergency, a subsequent promise enforceable
Adequacy of consideration
Cts do no inquire, however if entirely devoid of value, no consideration.
Preexisting legal duty
Not consideration, EXCEPT:
- new or different consideration promised;
- promise is to ratify a voidable obligation
-preexisting duty owed to a thrid person
- honest dispute as to the duty
- unforeseen circumstances sufficient to discharge
Consideration to modify a K
Yes for CL
Only good faith (no consideration) for UCC
Forebearance to sue
May constitute consideration if claim is valid or claimant in good faith believe claim to be valid
Illusory promises
A promise to chose one of several alternative means is illusory unless every alternative involves legal detriment to the promisor, OR
- at least one alternatnive involves detriment and power to choose rests with promisee or a 3d party
- an alternative involving detriment actually selected
Primsory Estoppel and consideration
Consideration not required if:
- promisor should reasonably expect to induce action or forbearance;
- of a definite and substantial character
- and such action or forbearance is in fact induced
"As justice requires"
This means the answer is saying promisorry estoppel!!!
Defenses to formation
Absence of mutual assent
- mutual mistake
- unilateral mistake
- mistake by intermediary
- ambiguous K language
- misrepresentation
Mutual Mistake
Voidable if
- mistake concerns a basic assumption
- mistake has a material effect
- party did not assume the risk
Ambiguous K language
Neither party aware - no K unless both parties intended same meaning
Both parties aware - no K unless both parties intended same meaning
One party aware - binding K based on waht the ignorant party raesonably believed to be the ambiguous words
One area where subjective intent considered
Misrepresentation
Fraud in inducement - K voidable
Nonfraudulent Misrepresentation - K voidable if misrep was material
Innocent party may rescind agreement
Illegal consideration or subject matter
If consideration or subject matter illegal, K is void, UNLESS
- pltf unaware of illegality while def knows
- parties not as culpable as the other
- illegality is failure to obtain license when license for revenue raising and not protection
Illegal purpose
K voidalbe by a party who was
- unaware of the prupose
- aware but did not facilitate the prupose AND the purpose does not involve serious moral turpitude
Contracts of infants/minors
Lack capacity to enter into K binding themselves, but an adult making K with minor has duty to perform
Disaffirmance
Minor may disaffirm before 18, but must return anyting received that still remainds
Affirmance
Upon age of majority can affirm K and be bound, either expressly or by conduct
Exceptions to infancy
If making K for necessities (reasonable value)
Mental incapacity and intoxication
K voidable, but necessities exception applies. For intoxication--only if other party had reason to know of intox.
Duress/coercion
Voidable, but may reaffirm
Defenses to enforcement
Statute of Frauds
Unconscionability
Statute of Frauds
Certain agreements, by statute, must be in writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought.
SOF - Agreements covered
MYLEGGS
Marriage
Ks that cannot be performed in less than a year
Land contracts
Executory Ks
Goods above $500
Surety
SOF - Goods exception
Confirmatory memo rule between merchants:
If one party w/in a reasonable time sends to the other party a written confirmation that is sufficient under SOF t obind the sender, it will bind recipient if
- he has reason to know of confirmation's contents and
- he does not object w/in 10 days
SOF defense not raised...
it is waived
SOF part performance
Performing party has option of suing on the K for exepcation damages rather than just restitution
Unconscionability
Generally not the answer on the MBE
Parol Evidence Rule
When parties to a K express agreement in writing w/ intent that it embody final expression of bargain, any other expressions made prior to or contemporaneous with writing are inadmissible to vary terms of the K
Who decides whether writing is an integration?
Majority: judge
Evidence outside of the PER
Attacking validity of agreement
K interpretation
Evi. to show true consideration
Reformation
Subsequent modifications
Art 2 PER
Party may add consistent additional terms unless
- a merger clause exists
- the ct finds from all the circumstances that agreement complete and exclusive
Art 2, Agreement explained or supplemented by
- parties' course of dealing
- trade usage
- parties' course of performance
Art 2 provisions re interpretation
Battle of the Forms
Gap-filler terms
Delivery Terms and Risk of Loss
Insurable interests and identification
Bilateral Contracts formed by performance
Warranties
UCC - Acceptance w/ additional terms flowchart
Is k for sale of goods? (Y)
Are the parties merchants? (Y)
Did offer limited acceptance to its terms (N)
Do the terms materially alter the K? (N)
Did offeror object to the new terms? (N)
Then k formed WITH the additional terms, otherwise, K bbut W/O additional terms.
Gap-filler terms
If nothing said to price:
- price left open to be agreed upon and parties fail to agree; OR
- price to be vixed in terms of some standard set by 3d party and is not set, THEN
- price is a reasonable price at time of delivery
Risk of loss - noncarrier
If seller merchant, ROL passes only when buyer takes physical possession. If S not a merchant, then ROL passes upon tender of delivery.
Risk of loss - carrier
Shipment K (seller must ship by carrier but no particular destination) - ROL passes when given to carrier
Destination K (seller must deliver goods at particular destination) - ROL passes to B when goods are tendered to B at destination
Common delivery terms
C.I.F. - Cost insurance freight
C.F. - Cost freight (both are shipment)
F.A.S. - Free alongside
F.O.B. - Free on board
Effect of breach on ROL
Defective - ROl does not pass until defects cured or accepts goods in spite of defects
Revocation of acceptance - ROL rested on seller from beginning
Implied warranty of merchantability
Implied in every K for sale by a merchant (including sale of food or drink for consumption)
Goods must at least be fit for ordinary purposes for which such goods are used
Implied warranty of merch - seller's knowledge of defect
Irrelevant - not based on negligence but rather on absolute liability imposed on certain sellers
Implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose
Implied whenever any seller has reason to know the the particular purpose for which goods are to be used and that buyer is relying on seller's skill and judgment to select suitable goods and buyer in fact relies on seller's skill
Express Warranties
Any sample or model creates an exprss warranty if statement is part of basis of bargain (if buyer could have relied on it)
Disclaimer of warranty
implied warranties - must mention merchantability and be conspicuous.
For fitness - must be consicuous
UCC general disclaimers
Will disclaim implied warranties ("as is" "with all faults")
- or through inspection or refusal to inspect
- or by course of dealing
Damages for breach of warranty
Generally, difference between value of goods accepted and value of goods as warranted
If Warranty of title - buyer may rescind K, revoke acceptance, or sue for damages.
Modifications of K terms - Consideration
Under CL, no modification unless supported by new consideration.
Under UCC, valid so long as in good faith
Modifications of K terms - Writing
A written K can be modified orally. Under UCC, mod must be in writing if K as modified is for $500 or more
UCC - no modification clauses
No modification excepted by signed writing is given effect.
CL - provisions prohibiting oral modification
NOT effective.
UCC - Buyer's obligation to pay and right to inspect
When shipped by carrier, price due at time when buyer receives. When no carrier, price due at tender of delivery.
Discharge of duty to perform by...
Performance
Impossibility
Impracticability
Frustration of purpose
Mutual rescission
Release
Modification
Accord and satisfaction
Novation
Lapse
Promise vs condition
Failure of condition is not breach but discharges liability of promisor
A promise is a commitment to do or refrain from doing something, and failure to perform according to its terms constitutes breach
What determines promise vs condition
Intent of the parties - words and phrases used.
Provided, if, when = condition
Promise, agree = promise
Classifications of conditions
Condition precedent
Conditions concurrent
Condition subsequent
Absolute duty to perform discharged by...
Performance
Impossibility
Impracticability
Frustration of purpose
Mutual recission
Release
Modification
Accord and satisfaction
Novation
Lapse
Promisor's satisfaction as a condition precedent
Business/marketability = objective reasonable person test
Personal taste or judgment = Subjective test (but honest and in good faith)
Implied (Constructive) Conditions
Most important: duty of each party to render performance is conditioned on other party rendering performance
A duty to perform has not become absolute unless/until
the condition has been performed OR the conditions have been legally excused
A condition may be excused by:
- hindrance or failure to cooperate
- by actual breach (if material)
- by anticipatory repudiation
Effect of anticipatory repudiation
- treat as total repudiation and sue immediately
- suspend own performance and wait to sue until performance date
- treat it as an offer to rescind and treat K as discharged
- ignore repudiation and urge promisor to perform (though no waiver of repudiation)
Retraction of repudiation is...
ok, so long as other party has not canceled, materially changed position or indicated that she considered repudiation final