• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/18

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

18 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
when the number of seats to be apportioned changes but the population stays the same this creates >>>>
the alabama paradox
1. compute the standard quota & lower quota for each state.
2. each state starts with its lower quota as its apportionment. these lower quotas are summed to determine how many seats remain to be allocated to reach the desired house size.
3. seats are allocated to those states whose quotes have the largest fractional parts until the desired house size is reached.
Hamilton Method
states population/total population x (total number of seats) =
State standard quota
total population/total number of seats to be apportioned = average number of people per seat
standard divisor
if a state whose population increases loses a seat while a state whose population decreases gains a seat, this is said to be an example of
population paradox
select a divisor D that creates for each state a quotient = state population/D so that when ROUNDED DOWN these rounded quotients sum to the house size. then apportion each state its rounded down quotient. a divisor D that causes the rounded quotients to sum to the house size is called a valid divisor
JEFFERSON METHOD
round naturally for this one
webster method
average constituency of state=
population of state/number of seats awarded to the state
a quotient (q) lies between two consecutive who numbers n and n+1 is compared to sq root of nx(n+1)
statepopulation/d so that when rounded these sum to the house size.
huntington hill method
standard quota x standard divisor =
state population
to get the _____ ______ you must divide by the population by the apportionment
average constiuency
having a _____ constiuency is better because then you have fewer people per represenatives
small
to get the _______ __________ you take the states with the largest difference
absolute unfairness
to get the _____ ________ you divide the largest absolute unfairness by the other state (indiana)
largest relative unfiarness
what satisifies the standard quota rule
if each state recieves its standard quota either up or down

only hamilton method
no apportionment method both satisfies the quota rule and always avoids the population paradox

what theorem
balinski & young's theorem
what apportionment method favors large states the most??
jefferson
what are the advantages of a divisor method
they avoid paradoxes
but they may produce apportionments that violate the quota rule