• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/33

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

33 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Types Qualitative Research of Methods
-Focus Groups
-Intensive Interviews
-Field Observations
-Ethnographic field studies
-Historiography
-Case Studies
-Content analysis (can also be quantitative)
Aims and Philosophy
-A broad philosophy and approach to research

-A research methodology

-Specific set of research techniques
3 Basic Research Approaches
Positivism Paradigm

Interpretive Paradigm

Critical Paradigm
Positivism Paradigm
involves quantification, hypotheses and objective measures
Interpretive Paradigm
involves understanding how people interpret events around them
Critical Paradigm
interested in social concepts such as power and political ideology
Data Collection
is ongoing, unlike quantitative research
Qualitative researchers use an inductive method:
data are collected relevant to a topic and grouped into appropriate and meaningful categories, explanations emerge from the data themselves.
Preparing the Data
-Usually organize data chronologically in order of sequence of events that occurred during the investigation

-Data then organized into categories, which may arise from the data or be suggested prior to investigation

-Can have a room specifically set up to analyze the data, e.g., bulletin boards, other arrangements for visual display of data

-Researcher should try to remove any preconceived notions that might interfere with the research, e.g., referred to as epoche)
Analysis Technique: Constant Comparative
-Assign each unit of analysis into a category
-Refine categories as needed
-Look for relationships/themes among categories
-Write a report summarizing findings
Refine categories as needed
-May have to add/change categories
-Write rules or propositions to describe underlying meaning that defines category
Look for relationships/themes among categories
Generate assertions that can explain and further clarify the phenomena
Write a report summarizing findings
-Brief explanation that attempts to arrive at an understanding of the people and events being studies
-Trying to understand attitudes, not measuring them
Analysis Technique: Analytic Induction Strategy
-Define topic of interest and hypothesis
-Study a case to see whether hypothesis works. If doesn’t, reformulate
-Study other cases until hypothesis is in refined form
-Look for “negative cases” that might disprove hypothesis
-Continue until hypothesis is adequately tested
Reliability/Validity
-Different connotations for qualitative data
-Cannot calculate indexes of reliability, such as confidence intervals, etc
Emphasizes trustworthiness of study
-Multiple methods of data collection
-Audit Trail
-Member checks
-Research Team
Multiple methods of data collection
Use several different methods for collecting data to build confidence in results
Audit Trail
Maintaining permanent record of data
Member checks
Have participants read researcher notes and conclusions and verify accuracy
Research Team
Assumes members keep one another honest
Field Observations
-Study of a phenomenon in a natural setting

-Useful for collecting data and for generating hypotheses and theories

-Concerned more with description and explanation rather than measurement and quantification
Four Types
-Overt observation where research identified and merely observes
-Overt participation where researcher is identified and participates
-Covert observations where researcher is not identified and merely observes
-Covert participation where researcher participates but is not identified
Focus Groups
-Research strategy for understanding audience attitudes and behavior
-Usually between 6 – 12 people are interviewed together, with a moderator leading the discussion
Uses of Focus Groups
-Gather preliminary information for a research project
-Help develop questionnaire items for survey research
-To understand the reasons behind a particular phenomenon
-To see how a group of people interpret a certain phenomenon
-To test preliminary ideas or plans
In-depth Interviews
-Generally use smaller samples
-Provide detailed background info about reasons respondents give specific answers
Advantages of In-depth Interviews
Allow for lengthy observation of respondents nonverbal responses

Customized to individual respondents
-Different than personal interviews which usually ask participants the same questions from a questionnaire
Disadvantages of in depth interviews
Usually very long

Can be influenced by the interview climate
Depends upon rapport between interviewer and respondent
Case Studies
-Systematic gathering of enough information about a particular person, social setting, event, or group to permit the researcher to effectively understand how it operates or functions
-Extremely rich, detailed, and in-depth information
-Used in medicine, anthropology, clinical psychology, and history
4 Characteristics of Case Studies
Particularistic
Descriptive
Heuristic
Inductive
Particularistic
focuses on particular event, person, phenomenon
Descriptive
detailed description of the topic
Heuristic
new interpretations, new perspective, new meaning and fresh insights
Inductive
generalization or principle comes from the individual data (not test of hypothesis)