• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/9

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

9 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
history of the problem
-no data prior to 1970 -> 80% mortality of dolphins
-MMPA established 1972
-1977 Observers on US boats
-# of US vessels decreased, foreign vessels increased
1979
-1979 Inter American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC): conservation program for foreigners to match US efforts
1986
-1986 observers on all boats
1994
-1994 only "dolphin safe" tuna in US
- tuna embargo --> embargo on all foreign fish
-trade conflicts between US and Mexico, Ecuado, Venezuela and others
1995
-1995 Panama Declaration, many countries agreed to mortality limits and embargo lifted
2002
-91% fo all sets mad dolphins = no mortality or serious injury
-total mortality to less than 2000 (0.02% population)
-national marine fisheries service: dolphin sets don not have significant adverse impact
-sets with no dolphin mortality = dolphin safe
2004
-earth island institute, US humane society, and others challenged decision
- court ruling changed definition of "dolphin safe"
types of tuna sets
-dolphin sets: only set that takes mature adult tuna
-school sets
-log sets or fish aggregation devices

-school and log sets have more bycatch by numbers and variety.

**need to consider overall impact vs. dolphin impact**
current dolphin status: hypotheses
-bycatch is higher than reported
-ecological effects of removing tuna
-effects of break up of shcool
-repeated chase impacts survival and reproduction
-separation of mom and calf