• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/170

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

170 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
What is the scope of Article 9 of the UCC?
Article 9 applies to CONSENSUAL security interests in personalty or fixtures.

Note: When the collateral is real estate, apply the law of MORTGAGES. By contrast, when the collateral is personalty or fixtures, apply ARTICLE 9.

In general, personalty equals GOODS. Remember that Article 9 applies only to voluntary or consensual collateralizations. Thus, it does not apply to STATUTORY OR MECHANIC’S LIENS.
Giorgio Armani borrows $2 million from Bank. He grants Bank a security interest in his business equipment. Are we within the scope of Article 9?
YES. Why? This is A VOLUNTARY TRANSFER of a security interest in debtor’s GOODS.
Who are the cast of characters in Article 9?
i. debtor: ENTITY WHO OWES THE MONEY
ii. secured party/secured creditor: ENTITY WHO LENDS THE $
iii. security agreement: PARTIES’ CONTRACT OR RECORD
iv. security interest: RIGHT CREDITOR HAS IN PERSONALTY OR FIXTURES
v. collateral: PERSONALTY OR FIXTURES THAT CREDITOR CAN LOOK TO FOR SATISFACTION.
What are the types of collateral covered in Article 9?
TANGIBLE COLLATERAL:
a. consumer goods: those items used for personal or familial purposes, such as a home dining room set, blender, oven, refrigerator, car; or
b. equipment: items used in business, such as Macy’s cash registers, Mrs. Field’s cookie ovens, Le Cirque restaurant’s china, Dr. Dentist’s dental chair, Armani’s sewing machines; or
c. inventory: goods held for sale or lease, such as Circuit City’s stock of stereos, Nordstrom’s spring clothing line or Ethan Allen’s furniture line; or
d. farm products: crops, livestock and supplies used in farming operations, such as eggs, corn and cows in possession of a farmer.
e. fixtures: items annexed to realty, such as lighting fixtures, sprinkler systems, furnaces.

INTANGIBLE OR SEMI-INTANGIBLE COLLATERAL:
-patents, trademarks, copyrights
-stocks, bonds, mutual funds
-proceeds from sale of collateral
-accounts (i.e. right to payment for goods/services)
-promissory notes & drafts
How does one classify tangible collateral?
The key for purposes of classifying tangible collateral: primary use in the hands of THE DEBTOR.

GOLF CLUBS IN YOUR HANDS = CONSUMER GOODS
IN THE HANDS OF TIGER WOODS = Equipment
IN THE HANDS OF GOLF PRO STORE = INVENTORY
What are the important intangible collaterals?
-PATENT AND TM RIGHTS, COPYRIGHTS;
-STOCKS, BONDS, AND MUTUAL FUNDS;
-PROCEEDS RECEIVED ON SALE OF COLLATERAL ACCOUNTS;
– RIGHT TO PAYMENT FOR GOODS/SERVICES
-PROMISSORY NOTES DRAFTS
How does one create an enforceable security interest?
ATTACHMENT which means creating an enforceable security interest.
How does one attach?
The three requirements for attachment: remember “VCR”
i. VALUE must be given by creditor. For example, Bank lends $50,000 to Debtor. Bank has extended value.
ii. a CONTRACT, called the security agreement, must evidence the secured transaction unless the secured party has taken possession of the collateral.
iii. RIGHTS in the collateral: Debtor must have rights in the collateral.
Can we substitute something for the contract? If we need a written contract, what are the requirements?
If the secured party is in possession of the collateral, there is no need for A RECORD.

By contrast, if the debtor is in possession of the collateral, WE NEED A RECORD.

The record must:
a. BE AUTHENTICATED BY THE DEBTOR (SIGNED OR ELECTRONICALLY MARKED) and
b. REASONABLY IDENTIFY THE COLLATERAL
Mick Jagger lends $20,000 to Keith Richards, who gives Mick a security interest in the Brooklyn Bridge. Can Mick look to the Brooklyn Bridge for satisfaction of the debt when Keith fails to pay?
NO – DEBTOR DOES NOT HAVE RIGHTS IN THE COLLATERAL – THIS IS THE COMBINATION OF THE MICK JAGGER RULE (“CAN’T ALWAYS GET WHAT YOU NEED”) AND THE KEITH RICHARDS RULE (“I CAN’T GET NO SATISFACTION.”)
Can I get a security interest in items that are acquired after the contract is signed?
Yes - “after-acquired collateral clauses” are enforceable.
Secured Party lends $500,000 to Staples Stores, taking a security interest “in all of Staples’ inventory, whether now held or hereafter acquired.” What kind of clause is this? Is it enforceable?
This sort of clause is called: AN AFTER ACQUIRED COLLATERAL CLAUSE It is: ENFORCEABLE!
What is perfection?
Perfection is best understood as a PUBLICITY DEVICE.

PERFECTION = PUBLICITY It is something that the secured party does to put the world on RECORD or CONTSTRUCTIVE notice of the secured party’s existence. Proper perfection helps to protect the secured party from competing creditors.
Diana Ross lends $300,000 to Smokey Robinson, taking a security interest in Smokey’s vintage album collection. Diana attaches (meaning that she has complied with the VCR requirements. She extended VALUE, executed a valid CONTRACT or security agreement and Smokey has RIGHTS in the album collection.). What does Diana do to protect her interest?
To protect herself from subsequent creditors who might stake a claim to the album collection, Diana promptly and properly PERFECTS HER INTEREST.
Diana Ross lends $300,000 to Smokey Robinson, taking a security interest in Smokey’s vintage album collection. Diana attaches (meaning that she has complied with the VCR requirements. She extended VALUE, executed a valid CONTRACT or security agreement and Smokey has RIGHTS in the album collection.). She perfects her interest. Later, suppose that Smokey, in need of quick cash, borrows $100,000 from The Temptations, granting them a security interest in the same album collection. What happens if Smokey defaults?
If Smokey defaults, DIANA defeats THE TEMPTATIONS meaning that she has FIRST PRIORITY in the album collection.

THE CREDITOR WHO PERFECTS FIRST IS SUPREME.
How do I perfect my interest?
A. By the secured party’s taking possession of the collateral

B. Automatic perfection for purchase money security interests (PMSIs) in consumer goods.

C. the secured party FILES NOTICE of the security interest in the public records: Proper filing puts the world of potentially competing creditors on RECORD or CONSTRUCTIVE notice of the filer’s claim.
Siegfried and Roy borrow $5,000 from Cher, granting Cher a security interest in their famous pig, Babe. Cher properly attaches and then takes possession of the pig until the debt is repaid. What must Cher do to perfect?
NOTHING Cher’s taking possession equals PERFECTION. CHER = PERFECTION – “BABE, I’VE GOT YOU BABE.”
Tell me about PMSIs?
Automatic perfection for purchase money security interests (PMSIs) in consumer goods.

To encourage lending to consumers, PMSIs in consumer goods are perfected automatically, upon attachment.
But, what IS a PMSI?
It is a security interest that enables the debtor to purchase the goods.
Ethan Allen extends $6,000 in value to enable Debtor to acquire a new bedroom set. Ethan Allen takes as collateral a security interest in the bedroom set. What does Ethan Allen have?
It has: A PMSI
Upon attachment, PERFECTION IS AUTOMATIC

THE PMSI IS THE FAVORITE CHILD OF ARTICLE 9
So, I want to file my notice of my security interest. What do I do?
The security agreement could be filed, but rarely is.

Instead, the document typically filed is called a FINANCING STATEMENT (UCC-1). It is a very simple document whose only purpose is to provide interested parties with sufficient information to make FOLLOWUP INQUIRIES.

Article 9 aims to encourage ELECTRONIC FILING, and is “MEDIA NEUTRAL.”
What are the requisite contents of a financing statement?
Our buzzwords: SIMPLE AND SPARSE
The financing statement need only contain:
1) DEBTOR’S NAME AND ADDRESS
2) SECURED CREDITOR’S NAME AND ADDRESS and
3) A DESCRIPTION OF THE COLLATERAL

In the financing statement, super-generic descriptions of the collateral (such as “all of Debtor’s assets”) are PERMISSIBLE.
Where is the financing statement filed?
Filing is done centrally, with the state Secretary of State, in the state where DEBTOR IS LOCATED
- If debtor is an individual, he or she is located: IN HER STATE OF PRINCIPLE RESIDENCE.
- If debtor is a registered organization (i.e., a corporation, a limited liability company or a limited partnership), it is located: UNDER WHOSE LAWS IT IS ORGANIZED.
- The exception to central filing: If the collateral is TIMBER, MINERALS or FIXTURES, file LOCALLY, in the county where THE UNDERLYING REALTY IS LOCATED.
What’s the most important part of secured transactions?
Priority – if there are more than one secured party, who gets to take first? The basic concept: Priority is the purpose of collateralization, and the secured party seeks to SUBORDINATE, not to SHARE. This is a piggish norm. Each claimant is entitled to satisfaction IN FULL before a subordinated claimant is entitled to take.
Who are the cast of characters of priority?
AUPie – Attached Unperfected Creditor
LC – Lien Creditor
PAC – Perfected Attached Creditor
NOCie – Non-Ordinary Course Buyer
BIOC – Buyer in Ordinary Course
GUC – General Unsecured Creditor
What’s an AUPie, Attached Unperfected Creditor?
AUPie (Attached Unperfected Creditor): This is the Article 9 creditor who creates an enforceable security interest, i.e., it attaches, but either never bothers to perfect or tries to perfect but botches the effort, perhaps by filing in the wrong place.
What is a lien creditor?
LC (lien creditor): This is the general unsecured creditor who goes to court to get a judicial lien on the collateral.
What is a perfected attached creditor (PAC)?
PAC (Perfected Attached Creditor): This is the Article 9 creditor who succeeds in attaining perfection.
What is a non-ordinary course buyer?
NOCie (Non-Ordinary Course Buyer): This is someone who purchases the collateral outside the ordinary stream of commerce. For example, Steven Tyler buys a guitar from his auto mechanic.
What is a buyer in ordinary course (BIOC)?
BIOC (Buyer in Ordinary Course): This is someone who purchases the collateral from a merchant’s inventory. For example, Steven Tyler buys a guitar from Sam Ash Guitar Store.
What is a general unsecured creditor?
GUC (General Unsecured Creditor): This is the lender who never bothered to take collateral. For example, Jared lends the Subway Sandwich Co. $50,000, and, believing it to be a good credit risk, takes no collateral to back up his extension of value. – SUPREME LOSER IN ANY ARTICLE 9 SITUATION

JARED LOANS $50K TO SUBWAY WITH NO SECURITY INTEREST – SUPREME LOSER
In a nutshell, how do the characters rank?
Rank:
1. BIOC [buyer in ordinary course]
2. PAC [perfected attached creditor]
3. LC [lien creditor]
4. NOCie [non-ordinary course buyer]
5. AUPie [attached unperfected creditor]
6. GUC [general unsecured creditor]
Who wins between AUPie vs. the World?
AUPie’s interest is enforceable as against THE DEBTOR , and AUPie will defeat any subsequent AUPie as well as any GUC.

AUPie will lose to PAC, to LC, and to ANY BUYER without knowledge of the security interest.
What about PAC v. the World?
PAC defeats all, except:
i. the PAC who filed first;
ii. certain PMSI-holders;
iii. the BIOC.
What happens when there are two PACs, who wins?
The PAC who filed first: PAC vs. PAC: The Rule: FIRST IN TIME, FIRST IN RIGHT
Calista Flockhart extends $10,000 in value to Robert Downey, Jr., taking a security interest in Robert’s Rolex watch. Calista perfects properly on Jan. 10, 2003. Later, Barry White extends $5,000 in value to Robert, taking a security interest in the same watch. Barry perfects properly on Feb. 1, 2003. Who has first priority in the watch?
Calista – she filed first. RULE: First in time, first in right. Note that for purposes of determining priority, Article 9 gives special effect to filing. It allows for early filing, even at the onset of loan negotiations. If an early filer subsequently attaches, she is allowed the benefit of her early filing. Priority will relate back to the early filing date.
Suppose now that on Jan. 1, Calista begins negotiating with Robert about lending him $10,000. On Jan. 1, Calista files a financing statement covering Robert’s Rolex. The negotiations continue. Later, Barry lends Robert $10,000, and on Feb. 1, Barry perfects a security interest in the Rolex. On March 1, Calista and Robert finally reach an agreement and Calista lends him the $10,000 and Robert signs an appropriate security agreement granting Calista a security interest in the Rolex. Who has first priority in the watch?
CALISTA Why? SHE FILED FIRST, AS SHE’S ALLOWED TO DO, AND SHE SUBSEQUENTLY ATTACHED. NOW, HAVING ATTACHED, HER ATTACHMENT IS RELATED BACK TO THE EARLIER FILING DATE.
What about when a PAC v. PMSI? First question, when does this arise? Who is an AACF?
Here, the relevant priority contest is between the after-acquired collateral financier (AACF) and the holder of a purchase-money security interest (PMSI).

First, who is an AACF? A secured creditor who takes as collateral a security interest “in all of Debtor’s [business equipment, for example, or inventory, for example], whether now held or hereafter acquired.”

When you’ve got an after-acquired collateral clause, you’ve got an AACF.
What about when a PAC v. PMSI? Okay, so we know about the AACF, what’s a PMSI again?
Second, what is a PMSI? A security interest that enables the debtor to purchase the goods. In other words, it is an extension of value by a lender who takes as collateral a security interest in the very item that its loan enables the debtor to acquire.
Debtor purchases a $4,000 stereo system on credit from The Wiz, granting The Wiz a security interest in the stereo system. What interest does the Wiz have in the stereo?
The Wiz has a PMSI.
Debtor borrows $4,000 from Bank to purchase a stereo system, granting Bank a security interest in the stereo system. What interest does Bank have in the stereo?
Bank has PMSI.
What about when a PAC v. PMSI? How does an AACF collide with the PMSI?
a. The AACF v. the PMSI-holder when the collateral is equipment b. The AACF v. the PMSI-holder when the collateral is inventory
On March 1, Macy’s borrows $2 million from Bank, granting Bank a security interest “in all of Macy’s business equipment, whether now held or hereafter acquired.” Bank properly perfects its interest. Bank is what? Later, on August 1, Macy’s buys 10 new cash registers on credit from Office Depot, granting Office Depot a security interest in the new cash registers. Office Depot is what? The collateral is classified as what? How can Office Depot achieve first priority in the 10 new cash registers?
Bank is an AAFC
Office Depot is a PMSI holder
The collateral is classified as equipment
All that Office Depot must do is FILE PROPERLY within 20 DAYS after Macy’s takes possession of the cash registers.
On Oct. 1, Macy’s borrows $2 million from Bank, granting Bank a security interest “in all of Macy’s inventory, whether now held or hereafter acquired.” Bank properly perfects its interest. Bank is what? Later, on Jan. 1, Macy’s acquires Armani’s spring line of clothing on credit, granting Armani a security interest in the line. Armani is what? The collateral is classified as what? How can Armani achieve first priority in the Armani spring line?
Bank is AAFC PAC. Armani is PMSI HOLDER. The collateral is classified as INVENTORY.
Armani must do two things:
1. Armani must FILE PROPERLY before debtor Macy’s takes possession AND
2. Armani must NOTIFY BANK before debtor Macy’s takes possession.
Why do we require these steps when we’re talking about inventory?
The reason for these additional safeguards when the collateral is inventory: TO PREVENT DEBTOR FROM COMMITTING FRAUD (insofar as debtor might otherwise entice the AACF into extending additional value to it on the basis of the new acquisition of inventory, failing to mention that the new inventory is already encumbered on behalf of the PMSI lender).
What about PAC vs. BIOC?
General rule: PAC loses to BIOC. A buyer in the ordinary course of business takes free of a perfected security interest in seller’s inventory.
Bank has a perfected security interest in Nordstrom’s inventory. When Mrs. Jones buys a suit or handbag from Nordstrom’s, what happens?
Mrs. Jones can rest assured that she has good title to the merchandise. The reasons for this rule: TO PROMOTE COMMERCE AND CONSUMERISM AND TO HONOR BUYER’S REASONABLE EXPECTATIONS.
What is default?
Default: DEBTOR IS IN BREACH, TYPICALLY FOR FAILURE TO PAY (LOOK TO SECURITY AGREEMENT)
Once debtor has defaulted what does Article 9 say a creditor can do?
A. Self-help repossession
B. Repossession by judicial action
C. Strict Foreclosure
D. Sale
E. Action for deficiency judgment
What is self-help repossession, when is it permissible?
Self-help repossession is permissible, so long as CREDITOR DOES NOT BREACH THE PEACE.
A breach of the peace occurs when the secured party’s actions are LIKELY TO CAUSE VIOLENCE.

* Thus, the relevant question is not whether or not an actual fight broke out, but whether the secured party did something provocative or likely to cause violence.

* A repossession made over any protest by the debtor, however mild the protest, constitutes a breach of the peace. For that matter, if the repossessor misuses the color of law, by for example impersonating a law enforcement officer, he or she has used CONSTRUCTIVE FORCE and therefore has breached the peace.
What are the penalties for a creditor’s misconduct?
Civil and criminal penalties attach to creditor’s misconduct.
What special rules about collateral in a debtor’s home? What about outside the home?
Repossession when the collateral is in debtor’s home: THE HOME ENJOYS A ZONE OF PRIVACY. SP may not enter debtor’s home without VOLUNTARY AND CONTEMPORANEOUS CONSENT.

Repossession when the collateral is outside the home: MORE LEEWAY SP may take the collateral so long as there is no DEBTOR OBJECTION.
What if I don’t want to chance self-help repossession, what can I do?
If the secured party chooses not to resort to self-help repossession, he or she may MAY GO TO COURT TO OBTAIN COURT TO OBTAIN A JUDICIAL WRIT, ordering the sheriff to obtain possession of the collateral and deliver it to the secured party.
What is strict foreclosure?
Strict foreclosure occurs when the secured party retains the collateral IN FULL SATISFACTION OF THE OUTSTANDING DEBT. In other words, the creditor lawfully retains the collateral and the debt in turn is canceled.
Janet Jackson borrows $50,000 from Bank, granting Bank a security interest in Janet’s yacht. Thereafter, she defaults, still owing Bank $44,000. Bank lawfully repossesses the yacht and properly accomplishes strict foreclosure. What does this mean?
Bank RETAINS the yacht and the debt is DISCHARGED.
How do I strictly foreclose?
How to strictly foreclose: To accomplish strict foreclosure, the secured party must send a written proposal to retain the collateral in satisfaction of the debt.
To whom is the written proposal for strict foreclosure sent?
a. When the collateral is consumer goods, the notice is sent to THE DEBTOR AND ANY SECONDARY OBLIGORS. A secondary obligor is A GUARANTOR OF THE UNDERLYING DEBT.

b. When the collateral is not consumer goods, the notice is sent to THE DEBTOR and OTHER SECURED PARTIES who have told the foreclosing creditor of their security interest in the collateral, as well as PERFECTED SECURED PARTIES, AND SECONDARY OBLIGORS.
Donny is the debtor. Marie promises that if Donny cannot pay, she will pay. What is Marie?
Marie is THE SECONDARY OBLIGOR.
What happens if any of the notified parties objects? When can they object?
If any of the notified parties objects within 20 days after the notice is sent, strict foreclosure will not be allowed. Instead, the collateral must be disposed of by sale.

******* RULE – DON’T HAVE TO OBJECT FOR CAUSE, CAN OBJECT FOR ANY OLD REASON
**What special rules apply if we’re talking about a consumer good?
Consumer goods and the 60% rule: If the collateral is consumer goods and the debtor has paid 60% of the loan in the event of a non-PMSI or 60% of the cash price in the event of a PMSI, strict foreclosure is not allowed. Instead, the secured party must sell the collateral within 90 days or be liable in conversion.
Prince purchases a $30,000 little red Corvette on credit from Chevrolet. Chevrolet takes a security interest in the car. Chevrolet has A PMSI IN A CONSUMER GOOD After repaying $18,000, Prince defaults. May Chevrolet strictly foreclose?
NO, BECAUSE PRINCE HAS ALREADY REPAID 60% OF THE CASH PRICE. WHY IS THIS JUST? BECAUSE WE DON’T WANT TO AWARD CREDITORS A WINDFALL – ALL THE PRINCIPAL AND ALSO THE COLLATERAL ITSELF.
Can the secured party sell the collateral?
The secured party may sell the collateral and apply the sale proceeds to the debt. The secured party chooses whether the sale will be public (i.e., a public auction) or private.
What are the general rules for selling the collateral?
Two governing guideposts:
i. Every aspect of the sale must be: COMMERCIALLY REASONABLE.
ii. Prior to the sale, reasonable notice must be sent.
How do we know if notice is reasonable? Is there a shortcut?
Notice must be commercially reasonable.

Article 9 provides standard notice forms which, if used, are presumptively COMMERCIALLY REASONABLE.
Who do I have to send notice to?
a. if the collateral is consumer goods, notice must be sent to DEBTOR AND ANY SECONDARY OBLIGORS.
b. with all other types of collateral, notice must be sent to DEBTOR and those secured parties who have advised the foreclosing creditor of their security interest, as well as PERFECTED SECURED PARTIES AND SECONDARY OBLIGORS.
What must the notice contain?
The content of the notice depends on the type of sale. If disposition is by public sale, the notice must state THE TIME AND PLACE OF SALE. If disposition is by private sale, the notice must state the time after which the sale will be made. For example, “Please be advised that after Feb. 1, 2003, Secured Party will sell the following collateral . . . .”
Are there any special notice rules for consumer goods?
d. For consumer goods, additional consumer-protective provisions are mandatory, including HOW ANY DEFICIENCY WILL BE CALCULATED and HOW DEBTOR CAN REDEEM THE COLLATERAL
How much advance notice is required?
There is no bright line. The standard is one of COMMERCIAL REASONABLENESS. However, in a nonconsumer transaction, notice is deemed sent within a reasonable time if it is sent 10 DAYS OR MORE before the time of sale.
May the secured party buy at sale?
At a public sale, YES
At a private sale, absent external market checks, NO.

Why not? TOO MUCH POTENTIAL FOR UNREGULATED SELF-DEALING.
What if I don’t get as much from the sale of the item as the loan was for, can I get the remainder?
Yes – this is a deficiency judgment
Suppose that the outstanding debt is $100,000, and that the sale of the collateral nets only $60,000 for the secured party. What can the secured party do?
Seek a deficiency judgment against the debtor.

Note: If a secured party sells collateral at a low price to an insider buyer, the price that AN INDEPENDENT 3D PARTY WOULD HAVE PAID, rather than the actual amount paid, is the price that will be used in calculating the deficiency. TO AVOID FRAUD/COLLUSION
Can the Debtor get his property back?
Possibly – the debtor has a limited right of redemption
i. The debtor’s right to redeem the collateral is cut off once the secured party has RESOLD THE COLLATERAL or completed a STRICT FORECLOSURE.
ii. To redeem, the debtor must pay the amount owed plus: ACCRUED INTEREST AND SECURED PARTY’S REASONABLE EXPENSES INCLUDING ATTORNEY’S FEES.
iii. If the security agreement contains an acceleration clause (which permits the creditor to declare the full balance due in the event of default), to redeem the debtor must: PAY OFF ENTIRE UNPAID BALANCE & ACCRUED INTEREST + SECURED PARTIES REASONABLE EXPENSES INCLUDING ATTORNEY’S FEES.
**What is the effect when a negotiable instrument is duly negotiated to a holder in due course?
Holder in due course takes the instrument free of all claims to it, free of personal defenses, and subject only to real defenses.

BRIGHT LINE RULE
What questions do we ask in commercial paper?
I. When is the given writing a negotiable instrument as opposed to a mere contract? (NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT = ARTICLE 3; IF CONTRACT, CONTRACT LAW) II. In a commercial paper fact pattern, on what theories might the defendant get sued? A. Contract or Signature Liability B. Warranty or Transfer Liability III. How is a negotiable instrument duly negotiated, meaning, what makes the transfer proper? IV. How does a transferee qualify as a holder in due course (HDC)? V. What are claims and personal defenses (which the HDC takes free of) and what are real defenses (which the HDC is subject to)?
What are the types of negotiable instrument?
I. TYPES OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS: A. THE PROMISSORY NOTE B. THE DRAFT WE ARE DEALING WITH WRITINGS CALLING FOR THE PAYMENT OF MONEY
What does a promissory note look like?
I promise to pay to the order of Britney Spears FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS. /s/Justin Timberlake
What distinguishes a promissory note? Who are the parties to a promissory note?
Think of the promissory note as: THE PROMISE MAKER.
It contains: AN AFFIRMATIVE PROMISE TO PAY and not just a mere IOU.

Two parties: The promisor is called THE MAKER. The promisee is called the PAYEE.
What distinguishes a draft? Who are the parties to a draft?
Think of the draft as: THE COMMANDER.
It contains: AN ORDER OR COMMAND.

Thus, a check is a DRAFT because it contains A COMMAND OR ORDER.

Three parties: The drawer gives THE ORDER. The drawee is ordered to do THE PAYING (THE BANK). The payee is the beneficiary of THE ORDER (THE ENTITY WHO COLLECTS.)
Who else might be a party to the draft or promissory note?
The Indorser: Appears in the context of promissory notes and checks. The indorser SIGNS ON THE BACK.
How to tell whether the writing is a negotiable instrument (i.e., a promissory note or draft) or just a contract?
To qualify as a negotiable instrument, we need:
i) a writing;
ii) payable to order or to bearer;
iii) signed by the maker or drawer;
iv) reciting a sum certain;
v) containing an unconditional promise or order, and no additional promises or orders;
vi) payable on demand or at a definite time; and
vii) payable in currency.
Do you have a mnemonic to remember what elements are required for a negotiable instrument?
[WOSSUPP]

W: WRITING
O: ORDER (PAYABLE TO)
S: SIGNED BY MAKER OR DRAWER
S: SUM CERTAIN
U: UNCONDITIONAL
P: PAYABLE ON DEMAND OR AT DEFINITE TIME
P: PAYABLE IN CURRENCY
Who has to sign the different instruments? What qualifies as a signature?
The instrument must be signed by the maker if it is a PROMISSORY NOTE or by the drawer if it is a DRAFT.

Any authentication, found anywhere on the instrument, qualifies. For example, the authentication could be initials, some defining mark, or a nickname, found in the margins or anywhere else on the paper. This is not a formal standard.
What about the language of the instrument? What does it have to contain?
The instrument must contain an UNCONDITIONAL promise to qualify as a PROMISSORY NOTE or unconditional order to qualify as a DRAFT.

By contrast, “conditional” = A CONTRACT.
What are some ways that an instrument can be conditional?
a. The express condition = A CONTRACT.
b. “Governed by” or “subject to” = A CONTRACT.

If the instrument endeavors to be “governed by” or “subject to” the terms of some other agreement or states that rights or obligations with respect to the promise or order are contained in another writing, it is NON-NEGOTIABLE.
The rationale is that the holder of a negotiable instrument should not be required to examine another document to determine rights with respect to payment.
c. Compare reference to another document – not necessarily conditional (e.g. this note is secured by a security interest in collateral described in a separate security agreement)
d. Also not deemed conditional if it limits method of payment (i.e. still negotiable, e.g. “I promise to pay from the funds I realize from my next wheat crop”)
What if the instrument refers to another document? Does that make it conditional?
Merely referring to another writing does not of itself make the promise or order conditional.

Further, a promise or order is not CONDITIONAL simply because it refers to another writing for a statement of rights with respect to collateral, prepayment or acceleration.
The writing recites “I promise to pay if the Mets win the World Series.” Is this instrument negotiable?
The writing is A CONTRACT AND NOT A NEGOTIOTIABLE regardless of whether the Mets win.
“This note is secured by a security interest in collateral described in a security agreement dated April 1, 2003, between payee and maker. Rights and duties with respect to the collateral are stated in the security agreement”. Is this negotiable?
NEGOTIABLE. Merely referring to another writing does not of itself make the promise or order conditional. Further, a promise or order is not CONDITIONAL simply because it refers to another writing for a statement of rights with respect to collateral, prepayment or acceleration.
What about if the instrument limits payments to a particular source or fund?
NEGOTIABLE. The instrument will NOT be deemed conditional merely because it limits payment to a particular source or fund.
“I promise to pay from the funds I realize from my next wheat crop.” Is this negotiable?
This is: NEGOTIABLE.
What about the sum? What’s required about the sum on the instrument?
To be negotiable, the instrument must state a sum certain or fixed amount, meaning a specifically ascertainable sum.

In other words, you must be able to calculate how much is to be paid, either from WHAT WRITING SAYS or FROM REFERENCE TO AN OUTSIDE SOURCE.
“$75,000 principal amount plus interest from date at 10%.” Is this negotiable?
This is NEGOTIABLE because you can calculate the amount from the face of the note.
“$75,000 principal amount plus interest.” Is this negotiable?
This is NEGOTIABLE because when the instrument states that it is payable with interest, but does not state how much interest, the judgment rate (the rate on a court judgment), which is set by state statute and therefore fixed, will be applied.
Does the amount of interest on the instrument need to be fixed, since you said we needed a sum certain?
While the amount of principal due under the instrument must be fixed, it is not necessary that the amount of interest be fixed. Thus, a variable interest rate or indexed interest rate is PERMISSIBLE.

The interest rate need not be determinable from the face of the instrument; calculation of the interest rate may require reference to information not contained in the instrument.
$75,000 principal amount plus interest at 3% above the prime rate, adjusted every six months based on then prevailing bank rates in New York City. Is this negotiable?
Yes. While the amount of principal due under the instrument must be fixed, it is not necessary that the amount of interest be fixed.

Thus, a variable interest rate or indexed interest rate is PERMISSIBLE. The interest rate need not be determinable from the face of the instrument; calculation of the interest rate may require reference to information not contained in the instrument.
Can I have my note payable in monopoly money? Rolexes?
No. To be negotiable, the sum certain must be payable in currency. Currency means MONEY. Money includes FOREIGN CURRENCY. Money does NOT mean GOODS.
If the writing recites: “I promise to pay by remitting my business equipment,” or “an ounce of gold” or “ten shirts,” or “$5,000 or a Rolex watch.” Is this negotiable?
No. It is NON-NEGOTIABLE. The sum certain must be payable in currency alone.
Can I give something in addition to the currency?
No. To be negotiable, the writing must not contain any additional promises or orders. Remember, two’s a crowd.
If the writing recites “I promise to pay $5,000 and give you my vintage Beatles album collection.” Is this negotiable?
No. It is NON-NEGOTIABLE. To be negotiable, the writing must not contain any additional promises or orders.
What about timing? What requirements are there here?
To be negotiable, the instrument must be payable on demand or at a definite time.
What does it mean if an instrument is “on demand?”
An instrument is payable on demand when it specifically states that it is payable “ON DEMAND” or “AT SIGHT” or “ON PRESENTATION.” If the instrument is silent as to the time of payment, it is still NEGOTIABLE, and payable on demand.
What does it mean if an instrument is payable at a definite time?
An instrument is payable at a definite time if, by its terms, it is payable ON OR BEFORE A STATED DATE or AT A FIXED PERIOD AFTER A STATED DATE.
“On or before Feb. 1, 2003” “90 days after Feb. 1, 2003” “On Feb. 1, 2003, but this becomes immediately due and payable if prior to that time the Giants win the Super Bowl.” Are these negotiable? What about: “Payable when my first grandchild is born”
The first three are negotiable. Note that Acceleration clauses are permissible, and do not destroy negotiability. By contrast: “Payable when my first grandchild is born” NON-NEGOTIABLE, because this future event is not linked to a date certain.
Who does an instrument have to be payable to in order to be negotiable?
To be negotiable, the writing must be payable to order or to bearer.
How does one make a payable to order note or draft negotiable?
Payable to Order: To be negotiable, the note or draft must use the word “ORDER” or the word “ASSIGNS” in connection with the payee’s name.
“Pay to the order of Andy Garcia.” “Pay to the assigns of Andy Garcia.” “Pay to Andy Garcia or his order.” Are these proper?
Yes – these are all payable to the order of Andy Garcia.
What does it mean to be payable to bearer?
Payable to Bearer: If the instrument is not payable to order, then to be negotiable it must be payable to bearer, meaning that it is payable to anyone who has it.
“Pay to bearer.” “Pay to the order of bearer.” “Pay to Andy Garcia or bearer.” “Pay to cash.” “Pay to the order of cash.” Are these proper?
These are all payable to bearer instruments.
“Pay to Andy Garcia” Is this proper?
No! It is NOT NEGOTIABLE. Instead, it is just a CONTRACT. Why? IT DOES NOT CONTAIN THE WORD ORDER, ASSIGNS OR BEARER. BY STATUTE FOR CHECKS ONLY – NOT NECESSARY TO USE THE MAGIC WORDS.
IN A COMMERCIAL PAPER HYPOTHETICAL, HOW DOES THE DEFENDANT GET SUED?
THE TWO THEORIES:
A. CONTRACT OR SIGNATURE LIABILITY
B. WARRANTY OR TRANSFER LIABILITY
What is the basic concept behind contract or signature liability?
Here, our defendant signed the negotiable instrument. Remember: When you sign it, you promise to pay it, and that’s how you get sued.
Who signed the instrument? Can the maker of a promissory note be sued?
The maker, merely by signing his name to the instrument, enters into a CONTRACT, whereby he agrees to pay the instrument. If he fails to pay, HE CAN BE SUED.
Who signed the instrument? Can the indorser be sued?
The indorser: an indorser signs his name ON THE BACK OF THE INSTRUMENT. He is considered secondarily liable for the instrument - after the drawee or maker.
Emeril uses his Food Channel paycheck to purchase a meal at Manhattan’s “21 Club” restaurant. The restaurant requires Emeril’s indorsement on the back of the check. If Emeril does not honor this promise can he be sued?
By signing the back of the check, Emeril promises: THAT IF THE CHECK BOUNCES AND HE IS GIVEN NOTICE OF THAT FACT, HE WILL PAY. If Emeril does not honor this promise, HE CAN BE SUED.
Who signed the instrument? Can the drawer be sued?
The drawer: the party WHO SIGNS THE CHECK. The drawer can be sued, but has secondary liability. If the check is accepted by a bank, the drawer is discharged and cannot be held liable if the bank fails to pay.
You purchase groceries and write a check to pay for them. Who are you in this situation? What happens if the check bounces?
You are THE DRAWER. By signing the check, you promise that if it bounces, and you are notified, YOU WILL PAY. If you fail to do so, YOU CAN BE SUED.
Who signed the check? Can the drawee be sued?
The drawee: THE PARTY WHO PAYS THE DRAFT. Typically, this is THE BANK. Note: The drawee does NOT SIGN. Therefore, it is not liable. (Remember that this is signature liability.)
Are there special words I can use on my check to avoid liability? Who can use these words?
“Without recourse” is a term of art used by INDORSERS and DRAWERS. It represents A DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY. “WITHOUT RECOURSE” PASSES TITLE BUT NOT SIGNATURE LIABILITY.
Johnny Damon indorses his paycheck by signing “without recourse Johnny Damon.” What is the effect of this additional language?
“Without recourse” is a term of art used by INDORSERS and DRAWERS.

It represents A DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY. Thus, Cheryl Tiegs IS NOT LIABLE FOR THE PURPOSES OF SIGNATURE LIABILITY. “WITHOUT RECOURSE” PASSES TITLE BUT NOT SIGNATURE LIABILITY.
What is warranty or transfer liability?
The basic context: Think of this as seller’s liability for selling a defective instrument.
Who can be sued for breach of warranty in commercial paper?
Any transferor who SELLS the negotiable instrument. Thus, if our transferor is not a DONOR he can be sued.
What determines who is entitled to sue the defendant for breach of warranty?
It depends on whether the defendant indorsed the instrument or not.
Okay, so who is entitled to sue if the defendant indorsed the document?
If defendant indorsed the instrument (i.e., signed on the back), any plaintiff IN POSSESSION OF THE INSTRUMENT may sue. When defendant indorses, warranties run with the instrument.
Gwyneth indorses her paycheck from Paramount Studios and remits the check to her agent, for services rendered. Her agent in turn remits the check to Stylist for his services. The check bounces. May Stylist sue Gwyneth?
YES Gwyneth was not a DONOR and she INDORSED the check.
Who is entitled to sue if the defendant did not indorse the back of the instrument?
If defendant did not indorse the instrument, then only the defendant’s IMMEDIATE TRANSFEREE may sue. The warranties will not run with the instrument.
Will, who never indorses his paycheck from NBC, remits the check to his agent for services rendered. His agent in turn remits to Stylist. The check bounces. May Stylist sue Will?
NO. Will did not indorse the check.
What are the warranties made by the defendant?
i. Defendant promises: THAT HE HAS GOOD TITLE ON THE INSTRUMENT
ii. Defendant promises THAT ALL SIGNATURES ON THE INSTRUMENT ARE GENUINE AND AUTHORIZED. Thus, FORGERY is a breach of warranty.
iii. Defendant promises that the instrument NOT BEEN MATERIALLY ALTERED. When the facts tell you that the instrument has been tampered with, IT IS DEFECTIVE.
iv. Defendant promises that there is no defense or claim good against the defendant, meaning that the instrument is enforceable.
v. Defendant promises that she has no knowledge of any BANKRUPTCY or INSOLVENCY PROCEEDING against the maker or drawer.
What does duly negotiated mean? What is the effect of proper transfer?
Due negotiation or “duly negotiated” means that there has been a proper transfer of the instrument. If the instrument has been properly transferred, the transferee is a holder and may be eligible to be HOLDER IN DUE COURSE. By contrast, if the instrument has been improperly transferred, the transferee is not a holder and cannot qualify as a holder in due course.
How is a payable to order instrument negotiated?
When the instrument is payable to the order of a specific payee, it is negotiated by DELIVERY OF THE INSTRUMENT TO THAT PAYEE. Any further negotiation requires that the payee INDORSE THE INSTRUMENT and DELIVER IT TO THE TRANSFEREE. The indorsement must be authorized and valid.
Paula Abdul loses her paycheck, payable to her order. Simon finds it, signs Paula’s name on the back and cashes it at Randy’s Music Shop. Is Randy a holder?
NO This is a bad transfer. Why? The instrument was payable to order, and therefore the payee (Paula Abdul) had to INDORSE IT. He never did. Thus, Randy can never be a HOLDER IN DUE COURSE.
How is a payable to bearer instrument negotiated?
If the instrument is payable to bearer, INDORSEMENT is not required.
Paula Abdul loses her paycheck, payable to bearer. Simon finds it and cashes it at Randy’s Music Shop. Is Randy a holder?
YES. INDORSEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED WHEN PAYABLE TO BEARER.
What are the types of indorsements?
Special or Blank; and
Restrictive or Unrestrictive
What is meant by a special endorsement? What effect does it have?
The special indorsement is one that names a particular person as “indorsee.” The indorsee MUST SIGN in order for the instrument to be further negotiated.
Bobby Donnell indorses his paycheck, “Pay to Helen Gamble, /s/ Bobby Donnell.” Helen is THE INDORSEE. Helen loses the check. Jimmy finds it, signs Helen’s name on the back and cashes it at Gullible Grocery. Is Gullible Grocery a holder?
NO This is a bad transfer. Helen never indorsed the check.
What is meant by a blank endorsement? What is its effect?
The blank indorsement is one that DOES NOT NAME A SPECIFIC INDORSEE. It may be negotiated by DELIVERY ALONE.
Bobby Donnell indorses his paycheck by signing his name on the back and delivers it to Elinor, who loses it. Jimmy finds it and cashes it at Gullible Grocery. Is Gullible Grocery a holder?
YES This is a good transfer.
What is a restrictive indorsement?
The restrictive indorsement CONTAINS A CONDITION.
Bobby Donnell indorses his check, “For deposit only, Bobby Donnell.” Lucy steals the check from Bobby and cashes it at Stupid Bank. Is Bank a holder? What, if any, are Bobby’s rights?
No. BOBBY RECOVERS FROM BANK IN CONVERSION.
How does one qualify for holder in due course status?
A holder in due course (HDC) is a holder who takes the instrument:
1. for value; and
2. in good faith; and
3. without notice that it is overdue or has been dishonored or is subject to any defense or claim.
What does it mean to take an instrument for value?
For Value: The holder must GIVE VALUE FOR the instrument. Note that giving value does NOT mean giving CONSIDERATION, which is a CONTRACT principle.
How are value and consideration different?
Consideration and value differ in two important ways:
A. A mere promise is not value.
B. Old value is good value.
Mike Piazza indorses and delivers his paycheck to Roger Clemens. In return, Roger promises not to pitch at Mike’s head for the next year. Is this value?
NO A promise isn’t enough. Thus, Roger could never qualify as A HOLDER IN DUE COURSE.
Carrie indorses and delivers her paycheck to Aidan, to pay him for the furniture that he made for her last year. Has Aidan given value?
YES, past value can qualify for value. Thus, Aidan could qualify as a HOLDER IN DUE COURSE if the remaining elements are met.
What is meant by good faith in holder in due course?
In Good Faith: Good faith means honesty in fact (this is a SUBJECTIVE test, sometimes referred to as the rule of the pure heart and the empty head) and the observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing (an OBJECTIVE test).
What does it mean to take without notice?
Without Notice: The holder must acquire the instrument without notice that it is overdue, has been dishonored or is subject to any defense or claim.

The notice requirement imposes an OBJECTIVE test. It asks, did the holder KNOW OR HAVE REASON TO KNOW OF THE PROBLEM?
So, what does it mean to take notice that an instrument is overdue?
Notice that the instrument is overdue: i.e., that it should already have been paid. If the holder has notice or reason to know that the instrument should already have been paid, he or she is not a HOLDER IN DUE COURSE.
i. Payable at definite time - HDC
ii. Principal in arrears – non-HDC (ie. Overdue)
iii. Interest in arrears – still an HDC
The instrument recites that it is payable on Jan. 1, 2003. Holder buys the instrument on Jan. 5, 2003. Is the holder a Holder in Due Course?
Holder is not a HOLDER IN DUE COURSE. She bought too late.
What if I know that a payment or more of the principal is in arrears, can I still be a holder in due course?
If holder had notice that a payment or more of principal is in arrears, he or she cannot qualify as an HDC.
What if I know that one or more payments of interest only are in arrears?
If holder takes with notice that one or more payments of interest are in arrears, he can nonetheless qualify as an HDC.
How might a holder have notice that there are defenses or claims against the instrument’s enforcement?
i. when the appearance of the instrument gives notice:
ii. notice that obligation of any party is voidable.
iii. notice of a competing claim to the negotiable instrument.
iv. notice that fiduciary has negotiated the instrument in breach of his or her fiduciary duty.
The instrument is stamped on its face “PAID” or “VOID.” Nonetheless, Phoebe buys it. Is she a holder in due course?
Phoebe cannot be a HOLDER IN DUE COURSE.

Why not? THE FACE OF THE INSTRUMENT SHOULD HAVE TOLD HER THAT SOMETHING IS WRONG.
Aidan sells a chair to Charlotte. He misrepresents to her that it is an antique. Charlotte signs and delivers to Aidan a negotiable note for $4,000 for the chair. Aidan indorses the note and sells the note to Samantha. What is Charlotte’s obligation to pay? Is Samantha a holder in due course?
First, as between Aidan and Charlotte, Charlotte’s obligation to pay is VOIDABLE. Charlotte has a defense to enforcement of her promise to pay because Aidan defrauded Charlotte. Second, could Samantha qualify as a holder in due course? YES, if she did not have notice or reason to know of Charlotte’s defense.
How might one have notice of a competing claim to the negotiable instrument?
If the instrument is lost by or stolen from the true owner, the transferee could still qualify as a holder in due course if the instrument has been properly transferred and the transferee did not have notice or reason to know of the theft or loss.
Larry steals a negotiable instrument from Carrie and sells it to Dave. Carrie discovers the theft and confronts Dave. Who is entitled to the negotiable instrument?
Dave, if the instrument was PROPERLY TRANSFERRED, and Dave did not have NOTICE or reason to know of the theft.
How might one dealing with a fiduciary lose holder in due course status?
With notice that fiduciary has negotiated the instrument in breach of his or her fiduciary duty.
Brad Pitt buys a speedboat for his personal use. He pays Dealer by indorsing and delivering to Dealer a check payable to the Brad Pitt Fan Club. Could Dealer qualify as a holder in due course?
YES, if Dealer did not actually know of the breach. This is the only time that the standard is one of ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE.
What’s the standard for determining if the holder knew of the breach of fiduciary duty for determining holder in due course status?
Actual knowledge. This is the only time that the standard is one of actual knowledge.
What is the shelter rule with respect to holder in due course status?
The basic principle: A transferee acquires whatever rights her TRANSEROR had.

In other words, the transferee TAKES SHELTER in the status of her transferor. This rule allows the transferee “to step into the shoes” of the HDC, even though she otherwise clearly fails to meet the requirements of due course holding.

Thus, transferee has all the rights of an HDC even though transferee is a DONEE or OTHERWISE FAILS TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF DUE COURSE HOLDING.
Napoleon, a holder in due course of a negotiable instrument, makes a gift of the instrument to Pedro. Is Pedro a holder in due course?
Pedro is a mere DONEE. Even though he doesn’t deserve it, Pedro qualifies as a HOLDER IN DUE COURSE because of THE SHELTER RULE.
What are the benefits of holder in due course status?
The rule: A holder in due course (and subsequent transferees who take “shelter” in that status) takes the instrument free from CLAIMS, free from PERSONAL DEFENSES and subject only to REAL DEFENSES.
What does it mean that a holder in due course takes free from claims?
A claim is a right to a negotiable instrument because of SUPERIOR OWNERSHIP. If a negotiable instrument is duly negotiated to a holder in due course, the holder in due course defeats the superior owner.
What does it mean that a holder in due course takes free from personal defenses?
The Holder in Due Course takes free from personal defenses: Personal defenses include every defense available in ORDINARY CONTRACT ACTIONS, such as: LACK OF CONSIDERATION, UNCONSCIONABILITY, WAIVER, ESTOPPEL, FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT
What does it mean that a Holder in Due Course takes subject to real defenses?
The Holder in Due Course takes subject to real defenses: To remember, think of MAD FIFI4
MA: MATERIAL ALTERATION
D: DURESS
FIF: FRAUD IN THE FACTUM
I: INCAPACITY
I: INFANCY
I: ILLEGALITY
I: INSOLVENCY
How is material alteration a defense? How does it work?
“Material alteration” as a real defense: A material alteration is a change in THE TERMS OF THE INSTRUMENT. However, if maker was negligent, he is ESTOPPED from raising material alteration as a defense. Negligence includes leaving blanks or leaving wide spaces on the check.
Maker writes a check for $100. Payee changes the amount to $2,100, then sells it to an HDC. What is the Maker liable for? What if he left huge spaces when writing the instrument?
Maker is liable only for $100.

However, if maker was negligent, he is ESTOPPED from raising material alteration as a defense. Negligence includes leaving blanks or leaving wide spaces on the check.
What’s the difference between “real” fraud and personal fraud?
“Real” fraud, known as fraud in the factum, is assertable against an HDC. “Real” fraud means that there has been A MISREPRESENTATION ABOUT THE INSTRUMENT. By contrast, personal fraud, meaning fraud in the inducement, is a personal defense. It is INEFFECTIVE against an HDC.
Luciano, who cannot read English, signs a promissory note after his lawyer tells him that it is a credit application. Is the note enforceable in the hands of an HDC?
Even in the hands of an HDC, the note NOT ENFORCEABLE. There has been “real” fraud, a misrepresentation about the instrument, which is a defense even against an HDC.
Frank Sinatra sells Ava Gardner a ring, telling her that it contains diamonds that date back to the 17th Century. After paying for the ring by check, Ava discovers that it is a fake. If the check is now held by an HDC, can Ava’s defense be asserted against the holder?
Ava’s defense cannot be asserted. Why not? THE FRAUD DEFENSE IS PERSONAL ONLY! Unlike Luciano, in the example above, here Ava knew that she was signing a negotiable instrument. In the hands of a HOLDER IN DUE COURSE, the instrument is enforceable.
What is the fundamental rule of commercial paper?
The bright-line rule: When a negotiable instrument is duly negotiated to a holder in due course, the holder in due course takes the instrument free of all claims to it, free of personal defenses and subject only to real defenses.
Tony Soprano steals a negotiable instrument from Carrie Bradshaw and sells it to Arlis Michaels. Carrie discovers the theft and confronts Arlis. Who is entitled to the negotiable instrument?
The answer: Arlis, if the instrument was duly negotiated and Arlis can qualify as a holder in due course.