• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/43

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

43 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Logic is...
The study of correct reasoning
The theory of inference
A symbolic or mechanical system for representing and testing patterns of arguments
Defective argument
The truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion
Inductive argument
Truth of the premises supports but DOES NOT GUARANTEE the truth of the conclusion
Valid argument
Valid only If the conclusion follows deductively from the premises
Sound argument
Sound if (1) it is valid (2) if the premises are true
Valid is a question of...
Form
True or false is a question of...
Content
Sound is a question of...
Form & content
Statements
Are true and false but NEVER valid, sound or unsound
Cogency
If the conclusion is well supported by the premises
If premises are well supported by the evidence
If we are considering all the available relevant
Appeal to Force
Arguer threatens reader/listener
Appeal to Pity
Argued elicits pity from reader/listener
Appeal to the people
Arguer incites a mod mentality or appeals to desire for security love or respect
Argument against the person
Abusive - arguer personally verbally attacks
Circumstantial- presents opponent as predisposed
Tu quoque- presents opponent as a hypocrite
Accident
General rule is applied to a specific case wasn't intended to cover
Straw Man
Arguer distorts an opponents argument and then attacks the distorted argument
Missing the point
Arguer draws conclusion different from the one supported by the premises
Red Herrig
Arguer leads reader/listening off track
Appeal to unqualified authority
Weak induction: arguer cities untrustworthy authority
Appeal to Ignorance
Weak induction: premises report nothing is known/proved and a conclusion is drawn
Hasty generalization.
Weak induction: a general conclusion is drawn from a typical sample
False Cause
Conclusion depends on nonexistent or minor casual connection
Slippery slope
Conclusion depends on an unlikely chain reaction of causes
Weak Analogy
Conclusion depends on a defective analogy
Begging the question
Arguer creates similarity that inadequate premises are adequate by leaving out a key premises
Complex question
Multiple questions are concealed as a single question
False Dictotomy
An either...or..."premise hides additional alternative"
Suppressed Evidence
Arguer ignores important evidence that requires a different conclusion
Equivocation
Conclusion depends on a sniff in meaning of word or phrase
Amphiboly
Conclusion depends on an incorrect interpretation of an ambiguous statement made by someone other than the arguer
Composition
An attribute is wrongly transferred from the parts to the whole
Division
An attribute is wrongly transferred from the whole to the parts
Basic Truth Function Table
Rule for Truth Table
Tautology
Everything under main operator are all true
Self-contradictory
Everything under main operator is false
Contingent
Under main operator, at least one true, at least one false
Logically equivalent
Same truth value of each line
Sufficient condition
Occurrence of event A is all that's required for occurrence event B
Necessary condition
Event B cannot occur without the occurrence of Event A
Enthymematic
An argument missing a premise
Contradiction
False in every valuation
Translations