• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/40

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

40 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Mr. Przemek Kordasiewicz,

I agree wholeheartedly with your recommendation of a ban on all patents on all life saving medical discoveries. Again, I would take it a step further. I think that the virtues of a purely capitalist system seem to have fallen apart at this point. In this literal life-and-death issue, ethics take priority over everything else. Just as Congress stepped forward to place a ban on the patenting of surgical procedures, they need to step forward and place a similar ban on these new medical patents (drugs, procedures and human genome work) which are having the identical effect. Additionally, Congress need to heavily legislate in favor of patients worldwide to keep drug patents limited, short, and drug prices at an affordable level. Something in the system is wrong when drug companies are the most profitable of all publicly traded companies and huge populations across the world are living in pain and dying because they are unable to afford the sky-high drug prices, inflated by the patent holders’ monopoly. The government needs to look into the situation independently and take a stand for the well-being of the taxpayers and citizens they suppose to be representing.
Thank you,
Benjamin (Mako) Hill.

(Intellectual Property in Cyberspace 2000, http://yukidoke.org)

As regards capitalist policies for drug patents, the author:

(A)supports them;
(B)criticizes them;
(C)defines them;
(D)advertises them;
(E)modifies them.
B
Mr. Przemek Kordasiewicz,

I agree wholeheartedly with your recommendation of a ban on all patents on all life saving medical discoveries. Again, I would take it a step further. I think that the virtues of a purely capitalist system seem to have fallen apart at this point. In this literal life-and-death issue, ethics take priority over everything else. Just as Congress stepped forward to place a ban on the patenting of surgical procedures, they need to step forward and place a similar ban on these new medical patents (drugs, procedures and human genome work) which are having the identical effect. Additionally, Congress need to heavily legislate in favor of patients worldwide to keep drug patents limited, short, and drug prices at an affordable level. Something in the system is wrong when drug companies are the most profitable of all publicly traded companies and huge populations across the world are living in pain and dying because they are unable to afford the sky-high drug prices, inflated by the patent holders’ monopoly. The government needs to look into the situation independently and take a stand for the well-being of the taxpayers and citizens they suppose to be representing.
Thank you,
Benjamin (Mako) Hill.

(Intellectual Property in Cyberspace 2000, http://yukidoke.org)

The author thinks that patents on medical discoveries should be:

(A)guaranteed;
(B)adjusted;
(C)increased;
(D)controlled;
(E)forbidden.
E
Mr. Przemek Kordasiewicz,

I agree wholeheartedly with your recommendation of a ban on all patents on all life saving medical discoveries. Again, I would take it a step further. I think that the virtues of a purely capitalist system seem to have fallen apart at this point. In this literal life-and-death issue, ethics take priority over everything else. Just as Congress stepped forward to place a ban on the patenting of surgical procedures, they need to step forward and place a similar ban on these new medical patents (drugs, procedures and human genome work) which are having the identical effect. Additionally, Congress need to heavily legislate in favor of patients worldwide to keep drug patents limited, short, and drug prices at an affordable level. Something in the system is wrong when drug companies are the most profitable of all publicly traded companies and huge populations across the world are living in pain and dying because they are unable to afford the sky-high drug prices, inflated by the patent holders’ monopoly. The government needs to look into the situation independently and take a stand for the well-being of the taxpayers and citizens they suppose to be representing.
Thank you,
Benjamin (Mako) Hill.

(Intellectual Property in Cyberspace 2000, http://yukidoke.org)

“I agree wholeheartedly” (l. 1) means that Benjamin Hill agrees:

(A)entirely;
(B)emotionally;
(C)enticingly;
(D)enquiringly;
(E)entertainingly.
A
Mr. Przemek Kordasiewicz,

I agree wholeheartedly with your recommendation of a ban on all patents on all life saving medical discoveries. Again, I would take it a step further. I think that the virtues of a purely capitalist system seem to have fallen apart at this point. In this literal life-and-death issue, ethics take priority over everything else. Just as Congress stepped forward to place a ban on the patenting of surgical procedures, they need to step forward and place a similar ban on these new medical patents (drugs, procedures and human genome work) which are having the identical effect. Additionally, Congress need to heavily legislate in favor of patients worldwide to keep drug patents limited, short, and drug prices at an affordable level. Something in the system is wrong when drug companies are the most profitable of all publicly traded companies and huge populations across the world are living in pain and dying because they are unable to afford the sky-high drug prices, inflated by the patent holders’ monopoly. The government needs to look into the situation independently and take a stand for the well-being of the taxpayers and citizens they suppose to be representing.
Thank you,
Benjamin (Mako) Hill.

(Intellectual Property in Cyberspace 2000, http://yukidoke.org)

The underlined expression in “to look into the situation” (l.20) can be replaced by:

(A)alter;
(B)control;
(C)clarify;
(D)investigate;
(E)resolve.
D
Where We Go from Here
By Thomas Claburn

Intellectual property doesn’t exist. Still, the business community profits handsomely by pretending
otherwise, with a little help from the law. For companies that watched their profits wither in a market torched by terrorism, the illusion is all the more compelling – intellectual property increasingly appears as an oasis of future liquidity on corporate balance sheets.
Intangible though it may be, intellectual property is the foundation of modern industry. “If you take a look at intellectual property as a whole – not just patents, but the concept – if we stripped out these sets of rights, what does it do to the world?” asks Kevin Rivette, founder and CEO of Aurigin Systems.
He says that removing intellectual property rights would collapse the movie, music, software, publishing, pharmaceutical, biotech, and aerospace industries, to name just a few. He also contends that the patent system – much maligned for granting frivolous patents to technologies like Amazon.com’s 1-Click – will continue to spur innovation as it has for hundreds of years.
And thanks to globalism and the World Trade Organization (WTO), intellectual property should see greater protection from the international community. The foreshadowing of that future became evident in 1993, when the United States Trademark Association voted to change its name to the International Trademark Association.
Nations with a long history of disrespect for intellectual property rights, like India and China, are finally starting to recognize the benefits of complying with WTO intellectual property regulations as they look to protect homegrown innovations on the world market.

(http://www.smartbusinessmag.com/article, Dec. 1, 2001)

According to the author, intellectual property is a(n):

(A)hazard;
(B)chimera;
(C)adventure;
(D)possibility;
(E)nightmare.
B
Where We Go from Here
By Thomas Claburn

Intellectual property doesn’t exist. Still, the business community profits handsomely by pretending
otherwise, with a little help from the law. For companies that watched their profits wither in a market torched by terrorism, the illusion is all the more compelling – intellectual property increasingly appears as an oasis of future liquidity on corporate balance sheets.
Intangible though it may be, intellectual property is the foundation of modern industry. “If you take a look at intellectual property as a whole – not just patents, but the concept – if we stripped out these sets of rights, what does it do to the world?” asks Kevin Rivette, founder and CEO of Aurigin Systems.
He says that removing intellectual property rights would collapse the movie, music, software, publishing, pharmaceutical, biotech, and aerospace industries, to name just a few. He also contends that the patent system – much maligned for granting frivolous patents to technologies like Amazon.com’s 1-Click – will continue to spur innovation as it has for hundreds of years.
And thanks to globalism and the World Trade Organization (WTO), intellectual property should see greater protection from the international community. The foreshadowing of that future became evident in 1993, when the United States Trademark Association voted to change its name to the International Trademark Association.
Nations with a long history of disrespect for intellectual property rights, like India and China, are finally starting to recognize the benefits of complying with WTO intellectual property regulations as they look to protect homegrown innovations on the world market.

(http://www.smartbusinessmag.com/article, Dec. 1, 2001)

The elimination of intellectual property is viewed as a(n):

(A)advice;
(B)necessity;
(C)menace;
(D)solution;
(E)achievement.
C
Where We Go from Here
By Thomas Claburn

Intellectual property doesn’t exist. Still, the business community profits handsomely by pretending
otherwise, with a little help from the law. For companies that watched their profits wither in a market torched by terrorism, the illusion is all the more compelling – intellectual property increasingly appears as an oasis of future liquidity on corporate balance sheets.
Intangible though it may be, intellectual property is the foundation of modern industry. “If you take a look at intellectual property as a whole – not just patents, but the concept – if we stripped out these sets of rights, what does it do to the world?” asks Kevin Rivette, founder and CEO of Aurigin Systems.
He says that removing intellectual property rights would collapse the movie, music, software, publishing, pharmaceutical, biotech, and aerospace industries, to name just a few. He also contends that the patent system – much maligned for granting frivolous patents to technologies like Amazon.com’s 1-Click – will continue to spur innovation as it has for hundreds of years.
And thanks to globalism and the World Trade Organization (WTO), intellectual property should see greater protection from the international community. The foreshadowing of that future became evident in 1993, when the United States Trademark Association voted to change its name to the International Trademark Association.
Nations with a long history of disrespect for intellectual property rights, like India and China, are finally starting to recognize the benefits of complying with WTO intellectual property regulations as they look to protect homegrown innovations on the world market.

(http://www.smartbusinessmag.com/article, Dec. 1, 2001)

Still in “Still, the business community profits...” (l.1-2 ) can be replaced by:

(A)Thus;
(B)So;
(C)Then;
(D)Or;
(E)Yet.
E
Where We Go from Here
By Thomas Claburn

Intellectual property doesn’t exist. Still, the business community profits handsomely by pretending
otherwise, with a little help from the law. For companies that watched their profits wither in a market torched by terrorism, the illusion is all the more compelling – intellectual property increasingly appears as an oasis of future liquidity on corporate balance sheets.
Intangible though it may be, intellectual property is the foundation of modern industry. “If you take a look at intellectual property as a whole – not just patents, but the concept – if we stripped out these sets of rights, what does it do to the world?” asks Kevin Rivette, founder and CEO of Aurigin Systems.
He says that removing intellectual property rights would collapse the movie, music, software, publishing, pharmaceutical, biotech, and aerospace industries, to name just a few. He also contends that the patent system – much maligned for granting frivolous patents to technologies like Amazon.com’s 1-Click – will continue to spur innovation as it has for hundreds of years.
And thanks to globalism and the World Trade Organization (WTO), intellectual property should see greater protection from the international community. The foreshadowing of that future became evident in 1993, when the United States Trademark Association voted to change its name to the International Trademark Association.
Nations with a long history of disrespect for intellectual property rights, like India and China, are finally starting to recognize the benefits of complying with WTO intellectual property regulations as they look to protect homegrown innovations on the world market.

(http://www.smartbusinessmag.com/article, Dec. 1, 2001)
The underlined word in “by pretending otherwise” (l.2-3) means:

(A)differently;
(B)clockwise;
(C)similarly;
(D)likewise;
(E)hypocritically.
A
Where We Go from Here
By Thomas Claburn

Intellectual property doesn’t exist. Still, the business community profits handsomely by pretending
otherwise, with a little help from the law. For companies that watched their profits wither in a market torched by terrorism, the illusion is all the more compelling – intellectual property increasingly appears as an oasis of future liquidity on corporate balance sheets.
Intangible though it may be, intellectual property is the foundation of modern industry. “If you take a look at intellectual property as a whole – not just patents, but the concept – if we stripped out these sets of rights, what does it do to the world?” asks Kevin Rivette, founder and CEO of Aurigin Systems.
He says that removing intellectual property rights would collapse the movie, music, software, publishing, pharmaceutical, biotech, and aerospace industries, to name just a few. He also contends that the patent system – much maligned for granting frivolous patents to technologies like Amazon.com’s 1-Click – will continue to spur innovation as it has for hundreds of years.
And thanks to globalism and the World Trade Organization (WTO), intellectual property should see greater protection from the international community. The foreshadowing of that future became evident in 1993, when the United States Trademark Association voted to change its name to the International Trademark Association.
Nations with a long history of disrespect for intellectual property rights, like India and China, are finally starting to recognize the benefits of complying with WTO intellectual property regulations as they look to protect homegrown innovations on the world market.

(http://www.smartbusinessmag.com/article, Dec. 1, 2001)

that future in “The foreshadowing of that future...” (l.26) refers to:

(A)international community;
(B)greater protection;
(C)intellectual property;
(D)patent system;
(E)compelling illusion.
B
Where We Go from Here
By Thomas Claburn

Intellectual property doesn’t exist. Still, the business community profits handsomely by pretending
otherwise, with a little help from the law. For companies that watched their profits wither in a market torched by terrorism, the illusion is all the more compelling – intellectual property increasingly appears as an oasis of future liquidity on corporate balance sheets.
Intangible though it may be, intellectual property is the foundation of modern industry. “If you take a look at intellectual property as a whole – not just patents, but the concept – if we stripped out these sets of rights, what does it do to the world?” asks Kevin Rivette, founder and CEO of Aurigin Systems.
He says that removing intellectual property rights would collapse the movie, music, software, publishing, pharmaceutical, biotech, and aerospace industries, to name just a few. He also contends that the patent system – much maligned for granting frivolous patents to technologies like Amazon.com’s 1-Click – will continue to spur innovation as it has for hundreds of years.
And thanks to globalism and the World Trade Organization (WTO), intellectual property should see greater protection from the international community. The foreshadowing of that future became evident in 1993, when the United States Trademark Association voted to change its name to the International Trademark Association.
Nations with a long history of disrespect for intellectual property rights, like India and China, are finally starting to recognize the benefits of complying with WTO intellectual property regulations as they look to protect homegrown innovations on the world market.

(http://www.smartbusinessmag.com/article, Dec. 1, 2001)

30 - When India and China are said to be “complying with WTO intellectual property regulations” (l.32-33), they are:

(A)quarrelling with them;
(B)competing with them;
(C)supplementing them;
(D)agreeing with them;
(E)undermining them.
D
Now I know what it’s like to
be a postman. I found out
while delivering several
hundred leaflets to homes in
our neighbourhood. Not only
did I have to contend with
truculent dogs. A quarter of
the front doors I visited
didn’t even possess a letter
box. Three cheers for our
postmen I say.
Mrs. A. Williams, Rednal,
W. Midlands.

Com base no texto apresentado, pode-se afirmar
que Mrs. Williams
(A) teve de lidar com a constante truculência da
vizinhança.
(B) disse ter participado de três comemorações com
carteiros.
(C) questionou-se sobre problemas com cães da
vizinhança.
(D) encontrou uma caixa de cartas perdidas na
vizinhança.
(E) mudou sua opinião sobre o trabalho dos
carteiros.
E
Now I know what it’s like to
be a postman. I found out
while delivering several
hundred leaflets to homes in
our neighbourhood. Not only
did I have to contend with
truculent dogs. A quarter of
the front doors I visited
didn’t even possess a letter
box. Three cheers for our
postmen I say.
Mrs. A. Williams, Rednal,
W. Midlands.

Assinale a alternativa que contém a palavra “like”
na mesma função gramatical em que aparece no
texto acima.
(A) I like to go jogging in the morning.
(B) She is just like a mother to me.
(C) They said they’d like some coffee.
(D) “We know what we like”, they added.
(E) He plays jazz, rock and the like.
B
Assinale a alternativa que representa a mesma
função expressa em: Bake the pie in a slow oven.
(A) You’d better bake the pie in a slow oven.
(B) You might bake the pie in a slow oven.
(C) You could bake the pie in a slow oven.
(D) You must bake the pie in a slow oven.
(E) You should have baked the pie in a slow oven.
D
Assinale a alternativa que completa, correta e
respectivamente, as seguintes sentenças:
I. She hasn’t been ____________for six months
now.
II. The manager fired three ____________.
III. The ________ hired a new manager.
IV. The expansion of the factory will mean the
________of sixty extra workers.
(A) employment-employed-employees-employer
(B) employer-employees-employed-employment
(C) employees-employer-employed-employment
(D) employing-employment-employees-employer
(E) employed-employees-employer-employment
E
Assinale a alternativa que contém os três verbos
com pronúncia diferente em relação à terminação
“ed”.
(A) robbed, loved, liked
(B) visited, wanted, needed
(C) looked, robbed, wanted
(D) played, added, called
(E) packed, phoned, stayed
C
A seqüência em que todas as palavras têm sílaba
tônica no seu início é:
(A) handbag - football - guitar - fantastic.
(B) horrible - policeman - passenger - necessary.
(C) envelope - confident - Japan - photograph.
(D) management - catholic - symptom - comfortable.
(E) hospital - persist - capitalism - perfection.
D
Assinale a alternativa em que todas as palavras
contêm o “s” final pronunciado da mesma forma.
(A) bats, caps, ads, lots
(B) laughs, makes, mops, larks
(C) causes, puts, does, pledges
(D) bus, comes, crosses, judges
(E) pencils, pens, comes, bites
B
Das palavras apresentadas abaixo, a única que tem
o som de “th” diferente dos demais é:
(A) cloth.
(B) thanks.
(C) clothe.
(D) three.
(E) earth.
C
Todas as palavras têm o mesmo som vocálico de
“duck” na seqüência
(A) cover - hush - fun - lucky.
(B) cut - push - money - pudding.
(C) butcher - honey - common - sugar.
(D) but - Sunday - love - bull.
(E) London - bullet - mother - put.
A
Assinale a alternativa que contém somente
“uncountable nouns”.
(A) advice, piece, work, lamp
(B) sink, rubber, paper, slice
(C) news, dust, wool, loaf
(D) biscuit, money, iron, rule
(E) traffic, fruit, information, grass
E
“People assume too easily that politics solve all
human problems. No one ought ever to make so
false an assumption.”
Reescrevendo-se o trecho acima na voz passiva, a
forma correta será:
(A) Too easily politics have assumed to solve all
human problems. An assumption so false no
one ought to have made.
(B) Politics are assumed too easily to solve all
human problems. So false an assumption ought
never to be made.
(C) That politics have been assumed too easily to
solve all human problems. So false an
assumption no one ought not to have made.
(D) All human problems are assumed by politics too
easily to be solved. An assumption so false
ought never to be made.
(E) Politics solving all human problems are being
assumed too easily by people. Never so false an
assumption ought being made.
B
I’d like to ask you _____.
(A) how old you are, when were you born and what
you enjoy doing
(B) how old are you, when were you born and what
do you enjoy doing
(C) how old you are, when you were born and what
you enjoy doing
(D) how old are you, when you were born and what
do you enjoy doing
(E) how old you are, when were you born and what
you do enjoy doing
C
I. He arrived _____ to see his little daughter’s
performance.
II. My teacher is usually nice but ____ she can be
very rude.
III. The airplane landed exactly _____.
IV. It was easy _____ to find good jobs but now it’s
almost impossible.
(A) in time - at one time - at time - on time
(B) at one time - on time - in time - at times
(C) at time - in time - on time - at one time
(D) on time - at one time - in time - at times
(E) in time - at times - on time - at one time
E
I. That material is ____of a mixture of polyester
and cotton.
II. Fruit ___ you good.
III. She seems to be ____ a lot of changes in her
plans.
IV. Have you ____ the jobs I asked you to do?
(A) done - makes - making - made
(B) making - made - done - made
(C) made - do - doing - make
(D) made - does - making - done
(E) done - does - doing - made
D
Assinale a alternativa que indica o discurso indireto
de:
“Please don’t drink any more,” said his wife. “Don’t
forget that we have to drive home.”
(A) She begged him not to drink any more and
reminded him that they had to drive home.
(B) She asked him not drinking any more and asked
him not to forget that they have to drive home.
(C) His wife told him to drink no more and advised
him to not forgetting that they had to drive home.
(D) She asked him kindly don’t drink any more and
begged him not to forget that they would have to
drive home.
(E) His wife said to him not to drink any more and
remembered him they had to be driven home.
A
It is widely acknowledged among men that all babies
are very ugly and it is with feelings barely raised above
the level of tolerance that one of them will gaze upon
( 26 ) . What a pathetic sight the little creature is with
its ugly nose and hungry red face, and how
extraordinary that anything so small ( 27 ) produce
such a terrible volume of sound ! He racks his brain
for something suitable to say to the hovering parents.
Nothing comes, for he does not want to display his
ignorance by asking (28 ).

26. (A) the baby’s friends of him
(B) the baby of his friends
(C) his friend’s baby’s
(D) his baby friend’s
(E) the friend’s of his baby
B
It is widely acknowledged among men that all babies
are very ugly and it is with feelings barely raised above
the level of tolerance that one of them will gaze upon
( 26 ) . What a pathetic sight the little creature is with
its ugly nose and hungry red face, and how
extraordinary that anything so small ( 27 ) produce
such a terrible volume of sound ! He racks his brain
for something suitable to say to the hovering parents.
Nothing comes, for he does not want to display his
ignorance by asking (28 ).

27. (A) ought
(B) have to
(C) is willing
(D) should
(E) is going
D
It is widely acknowledged among men that all babies
are very ugly and it is with feelings barely raised above
the level of tolerance that one of them will gaze upon
( 26 ) . What a pathetic sight the little creature is with
its ugly nose and hungry red face, and how
extraordinary that anything so small ( 27 ) produce
such a terrible volume of sound ! He racks his brain
for something suitable to say to the hovering parents.
Nothing comes, for he does not want to display his
ignorance by asking (28 ).

28. (A) what about is its sex
(B) about your sex
(C) what sex is it
(D) about what its sex is
(E) what sex it is
E
Assinale a alternativa que apresenta o mesmo
significado de “He racks his brain for something...”.
(A) He tries very hard to remember something...
(B) He brings back to memory something...
(C) He reminds of something...
(D) He recalls for something...
(E) He makes someone remember something...
A
It’s long been part of folk wisdom that birth order
strongly affects personality, intelligence and
achievement. However, most of the research claiming
that firstborns are radically different from other children
has been discredited, and it now seems that any effects
of birth order on intelligence or personality will likely be
washed out by all the other influences in a person’s life.
In fact, the belief in the permanent impact of birth order,
according to Toni Falbo, comes from the psychological
theory that your personality is fixed by the time you’re
six. That assumption simply is incorrect.

According to the text,
(A) birth control becomes part of folk wisdom.
(B) the order of birth determines a person’s life.
(C) wise people say that birth order controls
personality .
(D) the order of birth is a sign of wisdom
nowadays.
(E) birth order has nothing to do with intelligence and
personality.
E
It’s long been part of folk wisdom that birth order
strongly affects personality, intelligence and
achievement. However, most of the research claiming
that firstborns are radically different from other children
has been discredited, and it now seems that any effects
of birth order on intelligence or personality will likely be
washed out by all the other influences in a person’s life.
In fact, the belief in the permanent impact of birth order,
according to Toni Falbo, comes from the psychological
theory that your personality is fixed by the time you’re
six. That assumption simply is incorrect.

The text says that
(A) a person’s life is influenced by many things in his
lifetime.
(B) a firstborn child is radically like other children.
(C) firstborns have stronger impact on a person’s
life.
(D) intelligence and personality are effects of
permanent impact of birth order.
(E) birth control influences a person’s life in many
things.
A
It’s long been part of folk wisdom that birth order
strongly affects personality, intelligence and
achievement. However, most of the research claiming
that firstborns are radically different from other children
has been discredited, and it now seems that any effects
of birth order on intelligence or personality will likely be
washed out by all the other influences in a person’s life.
In fact, the belief in the permanent impact of birth order,
according to Toni Falbo, comes from the psychological
theory that your personality is fixed by the time you’re
six. That assumption simply is incorrect.

Toni Falbo
(A) agrees that a child’s personality is fixed at the
age of six.
(B) disagrees that at the age of six a child’s
personality is already fixed.
(C) is the author of the psychological theory involving
firstborn children.
(D) is a researcher who defends the impact of birth
order on intelligence and personality.
(E) states that folk wisdom explains how personality
and intelligence are affected by birth order.
B
Canadian researchers may have discovered why
women are ten times more likely to develop eating
disorders than men, and twice as likely to suffer from
depression. It seems that women produce the
brain chemical serotonin which is linked to humor
and appetite more slowly than men. Neurologist Dr.
Miko Diksic of the McGill University in Montreal believes
this slow production of serotonin is more than enough
to account for higher incidence of depression in
women.

De acordo com o texto,
(A) as mulheres são tão propensas aos distúrbios
alimentares quanto os homens.
(B) uma substância produzida pelo cérebro é
responsável pelo fato de os homens se
mostrarem mais propensos à depressão que as
mulheres.
(C) a maior incidência de depressão entre as
mulheres está relacionada com sua propensão
ao mau humor.
(D) os homens são duas vezes mais propensos aos
distúrbios alimentares que as mulheres.
(E) a produção mais lenta, pelo cérebro feminino,
de uma certa substância química, responde
pela maior incidência de depressão entre as
mulheres.
E
Canadian researchers may have discovered why
women are ten times more likely to develop eating
disorders than men, and twice as likely to suffer from
depression. It seems that women produce the
brain chemical serotonin which is linked to humor
and appetite more slowly than men. Neurologist Dr.
Miko Diksic of the McGill University in Montreal believes
this slow production of serotonin is more than enough
to account for higher incidence of depression in
women.

In the text, the word "likely" is twice used meaning
(A) enjoyable.
(B) suitable.
(C) inclined.
(D) appropriate.
(E) thoughtful.
C
The policeman on the motorcycle overtook the car
and waved it to the side of the road. He then asked
the driver if he knew what speed he had been
doing.
Infere-se pelo texto que
(A) a velocidade do carro estava incompatível com a
estrada.
(B) a estrada estava interditada mais adiante.
(C) o carro era roubado, não tinha placa.
(D) o policial multou o motorista porque ele não
soube entender a sinalização.
(E) o motorista do carro estava bêbado, não
percebia o que estava fazendo.
A
d) Since
A palavra que melhor preenche a lacuna é:

a) For
b) While
c) As
d) Since
e) Until
b) difficult
When you say that a problem is deep-rooted you mean that it is

a) easy
b) difficult
c) irrelevant
d) insoluble
e) pressing
C
Segundo o texto,

a) programas pontuais são os que têm maior probabilidade de serem bem-sucedidos.
b) os programas de inclusão social devem se restringir ao âmbito do governo.
c) ações conjuntas, em todos os níveis da sociedade, são a melhor forma de resolver o problema da inclusão social.
d) com exceção das pequenas comunidades, todos devem participar dos programas de inclusão social.
e) a inclusão social só pode ser alcançada quando as agências e organizações governamentais se derem conta do trabalho que esse processo envolve.
e
O governo da Escócia

a) acredita que as maiores barreiras à inclusão social dizem respeito às crianças e adolescentes.

b) está revendo suas estratégias de inclusão social face aos poucos resultados que vem obtendo

c) não está conseguindo integrar os programas de inclusão social dispersos pelo país.

d) está engajado numa abordagem estratégica de inclusão social que já obteve vários resultados positivos.

e) já deu início a um programa de inclusão social de largo espectro.
a
Qual das afirmações abaixo NÃO está de acordo com o texto?

a) O primeiro passo é o programa geral do governo absorver todos os programas individuais de inclusão social.

b) É desejável que os programas individuais de inclusão social estejam em sintonia com os objetivos maiores do governo escocês.

Programas que promovem a educação e criam oportunidades de emprego são de grande relevância para promover a inclusão social.

d) A autonomia individual e comunitária pode contribuir para solucionar o problema da exclusão social.

e) A prevenção é, a longo prazo, a maneira mais eficaz de resolver a exclusão social.