Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
13 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Completeness 1
|
Highly relevant
|
|
Completeness 2
|
Plentiful
|
|
Completeness 3
|
Accurate
|
|
Completeness 4
|
Precise
|
|
Completeness 5
|
Up-to-date
|
|
Introduction Should Have:
|
-What will be found here
-Its scope -Why its inclusion is necessary as a preface to the discussion of your full research study |
|
Conclusion Should Have
|
Statement of the strongest messages of the chapter
Implications made clear, particularly on the value of the study as a whole Clear links to the next chapter |
|
What the reader should think:
|
On the basis of everything that you have just read there is absolutely no question that the time I have spent researching this topic have been extremely worthwhile dedicated to the pursuit of this fabulous study. And, guess what lucky reader? In the next chapter you will learn all about how I planned and executed my empirical research!”
|
|
Reading academic work
|
Look out for
--Claims/conclusions --Reasons/interpretations of data that lead to the above --Evidence on which above is built --Any qualifications for the claims/conclusions |
|
Anticipate reader’s questions
|
-"What is your point here?”
-"What makes you think so?” -“What is your evidence?” -“So what?” |
|
Consistent use of tenses
|
Decide a cut-off for what is “current” and what is not
|
|
4 Mistakes in Lit Review
|
Knowing where to start, (e.g. wide then narrow, or narrow then wide?) and what to include
Knowing when to stop literature searching Knowing when to stop “perfecting” the file Knowing how far to venture into the literature of associated domains |
|
Lack of analysis
|
Material is simply summarised
Material has not been fitted to the needs of the study Over-use of quotations, obviously paraphrased sections of others’ work – student hands over power of authority Driven by simple author-by-author, format-by-format or chronological journey through publications, rather than a strong line of argument related to the research aims – you should be building an argument, not cataloguing a library Treatment does not hold together as a “story” Reads like a set of “facts” Purpose of chapter unclear in introduction Value of chapter unclear in conclusion Work at this level often looks more like a business report: short sections, bulleted lists, structure evident through multiple headings |