Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
220 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
What is Phonetics?
|
study of production and perception of speech sounds
related to the science of acoustics, as uses much the same techniques in the analysis of sound that acoustics does. articulatory, acoustic and perceptual phonetics. |
|
What is Phonology?
|
sound patterns of language.
examines what occurs to speech sounds when they are combined to form a word and how these speech sounds interact with each other. Explanation of these phonological processes |
|
What is Morphology?
|
study of word formation and structure
how words are put together from smaller parts, and rules governing this process. elements that combine to form words are called morphemes. A morpheme is the smallest unit of meaning you can have in a language. |
|
What is Syntax?
|
study of sentence structure.
Description of what is grammatical in a particular language in terms of rules |
|
What are Semantics?
|
study of meaning.
Description of how we represent the meaning of a word in our mind how we use this representation in constructing sentences |
|
Pragmatics
|
effect of situation on language use, or meaning in context
|
|
Historical Linguistics
|
study of language change and the relationships of languages to each other
|
|
Sociolinguistics
|
study of interrelationships of language and social structure, linguistic variation, and attitudes toward language
|
|
Language acquisition
|
L1 acquisition: how infants/children learn to speak their first language
L2 acquisition: how adults/children learn a second language |
|
Psycholinguistics
|
how language is implemented in the brain
|
|
Neurolinguistics
|
study of the brain and how it functions in the production, perception and acquisition of language
|
|
Applied linguistics sub-fields
|
Language teaching
Translation Language revitalization Speech pathology Computational linguistics Lexicography |
|
Teeth
|
are even;
form an unbroken barrier; are upright; top and bottom set meet. -not needed for eating, but great for articulation of several sounds. |
|
Lips
|
Muscles are more developed than other primates
Mouth can be opened and shut rapidly simple to pronounce certain sounds |
|
Tongue
|
Thick, muscular and mobile
Allows possibility to vary the size of the mouth cavity, allowing pronunciation of a large range of vowels Above allow us to produce a variety of sounds rapidly and in a controlled way\ |
|
Larynx
|
Simpler than other primates
allows air to move past without hindrance Not necessarily good : specialized larynx means though that we can’t seal our mouth off from our windpipe and breathe while eating, like monkeys |
|
Lungs
|
Function in similar ways to other animals, but
Don’t need to learn to breathe while talking easily adapted to language |
|
Brain
|
very different from other animals
Heavier, more surface folding of the cortex (outer layer which surrounds the inner core of nerve fibres). 2 hemispheres of brain do not function in the same way |
|
Phonetic alphabets
|
are designed for writing down utterances in a way that records how they sounded
|
|
Specialized alphabet
|
Many have been invented
One with widespread use is International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), used by phoneticians, linguists, speech/language pathologists, and increasingly by dictionary makers and second language teachers |
|
The International Phonetic Alphabet
Guiding principles |
One sound, one symbol
A symbol should always represent the same sound, regardless of the language being transcribed. A sound should always be represented by the same symbol |
|
The International Phonetic Alphabet
Guiding principles |
use letters of the Roman alphabet where possible
BUT: more speech sounds than there are letters of the Roman alphabet. Modifications [ ɲ ĸ ɢ ʍ ʏ ɥ ħ ] Letters from Roman-based alphabets of Europe [ œ ø ð ] Greek letters [ɛ Ɵ ] New symbols [ ʃ ] [ ʘ ] |
|
The International Phonetic Alphabet
Guiding principles |
Major sounds are represented by symbols; minor modifications of sounds are represented by diacritics on symbols
[õ] - a nasalized [o], like [o] but with air flowing through the nose as well as the mouth [n̥]- circle indicates that the sound is like an ordinary [n], except that the vocal folds are not vibrating. . |
|
IPA
Random Facts |
revised a number of times since 1888, most recently in 1993, few minor changes in 1996
standard system of phonetic transcription in linguistics. adopted by the American Speech and Hearing Association (ASHA), licensing body for U.S. speech/language pathologists and audiologists used for the entries in most foreign language dictionaries and recent British ones. |
|
Phonetic units
|
Human language is made up of a finite number of possible speech sounds.
segment syllable feature |
|
Larynx
|
vocal folds are on top of trachea, bands of ligament & muscle lying across the air passage which can be opened and closed, allowing air to pass or not.
opening between the vocal folds is called the glottis |
|
Glottal states
|
vocal folds can be positioned in different ways
As the air passes through the spaces between the vocal folds (the glottis), different glottal states are produced |
|
Voicelessness
|
Vocal folds are too far apart to vibrate, but close enough that they can cause some turbulence in the airstream.
air is allowed through freely, with slight friction noise. |
|
Voicing
|
Vocal folds are nearly closed, forcing a vibration when air passes in the vocal folds, which is called a voiced sound
|
|
Whisper
|
Vocal folds are open, but adjusted so that the anterior portions are close together while posterior portions are apart
|
|
Murmur/Breathy voice
|
Vocal folds are vibrating, closed almost like voiced, but relaxed to allow some air to pass through the glottis causing turbulence, hence breathiness
|
|
Creaky voice
|
only the front part of the vocal folds are vibrating, giving a very low frequency.
Try speaking at the lowest pitch you can. Then go lower |
|
Harsh voice
|
very strong tension of the vocal folds
|
|
Articulators
|
Upper and lower articulators work together to form an obstruction to the air passage.
|
|
Sound classes
|
We can group sounds into classes based on shared phonetic properties
|
|
Sound classes - consonants
|
Either complete closure or narrowing of vocal tract
Airflow is blocked or restricted so that noise is produced as turbulence/air flows past the constriction |
|
Sound classes - vowels
|
Produced with little obstruction
Tip of tongue remains low Voiced More sonorous than consonants |
|
Acoustic differences
|
Vowels are acoustically strong.
Consonants are low intensity. Can be seen on spectrograms which analyze the waveform into its frequency components. |
|
Syllabicity
|
Vowels form the nucleus/base for syllables.
Less sonorous segments surround the vowel peak. -careful, folded, computer |
|
Comparison of sound classes
Vowels |
Produced with little obstruction in vocal tract
More sonorous Form nucleus of syllable |
|
Comparison of sound classes
Consonants |
Complete closure or narrowing of vocal tract
Less sonorous Surround a vowel in a syllable |
|
Sound classes - glides
|
Show properties of both consonants and vowels.
Articulation like a vowel Movement like a consonant Pattern like consonants wrt syllables (never in nucleus) /j/ ‘you’ and /w/ ‘was’in English. |
|
English stops - variants
|
Aspiration:
After initial voiceless stops, there’s a delay in voicing of the vowel which is accompanied by a puff of air. pit [pʰɪt] spit [spɪt] tiff [tʰɪf] stiff [stɪf] cab [kʰæb] scab [skæb] |
|
Laterals
/l/ |
tongue tip raises to touch dental or alveolar upper articulator
air escapes through the mouth along the lowered sides of the tongue. laterals are most naturally pronounced voiced. |
|
English r
|
English r is retroflex – bunch the tongue upward and back in the mouth
IPA transcribes this r as [ɹ], but we’ll use [r] |
|
Other classes of consonants - liquids
|
/l/ and /r/ often pattern together in phonology
I.e. plied, pried, splash, spray, etc. called liquids |
|
Other consonant classes: sonorants
|
Sonorants are more sonorous, normally voiced
Sonorants are in opposition to obstruents Sonorants = nasals, liquids, glides, vowels. Obstruents = stops, fricatives, affricates. |
|
Syllabic liquids & nasals
|
normally vowels are nuclei of syllables, because they’re so sonorous.
But sometimes liquids & nasals can also become syllables. Transcription is not always consistent. |
|
Syllabic consonants
|
‘summer’ [sʌmr̩] or [sʌmər]
‘word’ [wr̩d] or [wərd] ‘tunnel’ [tʌnl̩] or [tʌnəl] ‘full’ [fl̩] or [fəl] ‘button’ [bʌtn̩] (or [bʌtən]) ‘mm-mm’ [ʔm̩ʔm̩] |
|
Glides, revisited
|
2 glides in English:
/j/ = Palatal glide ‘you’ [ju] and ‘toy’ [toj] /w/ = labiovelar glide ‘wish’ [wɪʃ] and found [fawnd] |
|
Vowels
|
14 vowels in English
Two types of vowels Simple vowels: consistent quality in articulation Diphthongs: change in quality within the syllable. |
|
Simple vowels
|
pat [pæt];
list [lɪst]; rest [rɛst]; pot [pɑt]; feet [fit]; foot [fʊt]; lust [lʌst]; boost [bust] |
|
Diphthongs
|
Major:
pie [paj]; pow [paw]; boy [boj] Minor: pay [pej]; blow [blow] |
|
Parameters for vowels
|
Height
Backness Tenseness Rounding |
|
Height
|
how high is the tongue raised
Divided into 3 classes High: [i], [ɪ], [ʊ]. [u] Mid: [ej], [ɛ], [ʌ], [ə], [ow], [oj] Low: [æ], [aj], [aw], [ɑ] |
|
Backness
|
What part of the tongue is moving.
Divided into 2 classes Front: [i], [ɪ], [ej], [ɛ], [æ]. Back: [ʌ], [ə], [aj], [aw] [ʊ], [u], [ow], [oj], [ɑ] (all central are back) |
|
Rounding
|
lip rounding
Divided into round or unround Round: [ʊ], [u], [ow], [oj]. Unround: all other vowels. |
|
Tenseness
Only tense vowels occur word-finally. generally tense vowels are the ‘normal’ looking ones. |
amount of vocal tract constriction
Greater vocal tract constriction & longer = tense vowels Less vocal tract constriction & shorter = lax vowels Tense: [i], [ej], [aj], [aw], [u], [ow], [oj], [ɑ] Lax: [ɪ], [ɛ], [ʊ], [ʌ], [ə], [æ]. |
|
Articulators; Again
|
Narrowing or closure happens with articulators.
Different articulators change airflow in different ways, and result in different sounds. For every consonant, there is an upper and lower articulator. |
|
Upper articulators
*Upper lip* |
labial sounds
/p/ /b/ /m/ |
|
Upper articulators
*Teeth* |
dental sounds
/f/ /v/ /Θ/ /ð/ |
|
Upper articulators
*Alveolar ridge* |
Bumpy ridge behind upper teeth
alveolar sounds /t/ /d/ /n/ /s/ /z/ /l/ |
|
Upper articulators
*(Hard) palate* |
hard bit of top of mouth
palatal and alveopalatal sounds /j/ /ʃ/ /ʒ/ |
|
Upper articulators
*Velum (also called soft palate)* |
Soft rear portion of rear of mouth
velar sounds /k/ /g/ /ŋ/ |
|
Upper articulators
*Uvula* |
long thin structure behind velum
uvular sounds (none in English, French ‘r’) |
|
Lower articulators
*Lips* |
/f/
/v/ |
|
Lower articulators
*Lower teeth* |
(none in English)
|
|
Lower articulators
*Tongue* |
Divided into parts:
tip/apex, blade/lamina, front, back/dorsum, root. |
|
Articulator:
Tongue |
Tip = apex = apical articulation
Blade = lamina = laminal articulation Front = palatal articulation Back = dorsum = dorsal articulation Root (none in English) |
|
Place of articulation
*Glottal* |
produced using the vocal folds as primary articulators
(ie. no articulators in oral cavity) /h/ /ʔ/ |
|
Naming place of articulation
|
Always lower articulator first, upper articulator second.
Dorso-velar Apico-alveolar Labio-dental vs. dento-labial Some articulation combinations are impossible (try apico-velar or dorso-labial) |
|
Manner
*Nasality vs. Oral* |
Oral
Velum is raised, cuts off airflow to nasal tract, creating oral sounds. Nasal: Velum is lowered, allows airflow to nasal tract, creating nasal sounds. |
|
Manner
*Stops* |
Complete closure of articulators
/p/ /b/ /t/ /d/ /k/ /g/ /n/ /m/ /ŋ/ |
|
Manner
*Fricatives* |
Continuous airflow; constriction, no closure.
/f/ /v/ /θ/ /ð/ /s/ /z/ /ʃ/ /ʒ/ /h/ |
|
Manner:
*Affricates* |
Combination of stop + affricate
in a stop articulation, the tongue moves rapidly away from pt of articulation. In affricates, tongue moves slowly, and movement is considered part of the articulation /ʧ/ /ʤ/ |
|
Stridents/Sibilants
|
Sounds characterized by acoustics instead of articulation
Noisier fricatives/affricates are called stridents or sibilants. /s/ /z/ /ʃ/ /ʒ/ /ʧ/ /ʤ/ |
|
Representing manner/place
|
3 parameters necessary to describe consonant & glide articulation: place, manner (includes nasality), glottal state.
http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~danhall/phonetics/sammy.html |
|
Suprasegmentals
|
other phonetic properties come into play which have nothing to do with place/manner of articulation
can often alter segments |
|
Suprasegmentals
*Pitch* |
Auditory property of a sound that can be placed on a scale High --> Low.
Noticeable especially in sonorants But everything has a pitch: compare [s] to [ʃ] |
|
Suprasegmentals
*Tone* |
In tone languages, a meaning difference may be signaled by a change in pitch.
English is NOT a tone language Tone language: Mandarin: [ma] with H tone = ‘mother’ [ma] with fall-rise = ‘horse’ [ma] with falling pitch = ‘scold’ [ma] with rising pitch = hemp |
|
Suprasegmentals
*Intonation* |
Pitch movement not related to differences in word meaning.
Can imply difference in sentence meaning. |
|
Suprasegmentals
*Length* |
Length is not distinctive in English
Many other languages do contrast short & long segments to make new words, however. Indicated by a colon following the long segment, ie [i:]. Italian: fato [fatɔ] ‘fate’ fatto [fat:ɔ] ‘fact’ fano [fanɔ] ‘grove’ fano [fan:ɔ] ‘they do’ |
|
Suprasegmentals
*Stress* |
some syllables are perceived as more prominent than others
syllables perceived more prominently are called stressed. English stress is perceived based on length, loudness and pitch. |
|
Secondary stress
|
Next most prominent syllable. Not all words have secondary stress, but most long words (ie more than 4 syllables) will.
|
|
Transcribing stress
|
denoted by accents
|
|
Vowels and stress
|
unstressed vowels are generally schwas
2 regular exceptions: [-ɪŋ] and final [-i] if unsure between ə and ʌ, pick ʌ in stressed syllables and ə in unstressed syllables. |
|
Phonetic Processes
*Assimilation* |
A process where one segment becomes more like another (usually neighbouring) segment.
For ease of articulation Extremely common |
|
Types of Assimilation
*Progressive assimilation* |
A following segment takes on a feature of a preceding one,
ie the assimilation moves forwards. |
|
Types of assimilation
*Regressive assimilation* |
A preceding segment takes on a feature of a preceding one,
ie the assimilation moves backwards. |
|
*Regressive assimilation*
|
possible impossible
probable improbable pertinent impertinent tolerable intolerable tangible intangible credible ɪŋ]credible considerate ɪŋ]considerate |
|
*Regressive assimilation* AGAIN
|
ban
bank gram sung calm pong The velum, anticipating the opening for the consonant, opens early, nasalizing the vowels somewhat |
|
Phonetic Processes
*Flapping* |
Where a dental or alveolar stop articulation changes to a flap (voiced continuant) articulation [ɾ].
ladder vs. latter badder vs. batter |
|
Phonetic Processes
*Dissimilation* |
Where 2 sounds become less alike.
Much rarer than assimilation. fifths [fɪfts] instead of [fɪfθs] |
|
Phonetic Processes
*Deletion* |
Removal of a segment.
Common in everyday casual speech veterinarian -> [vɛtənɛriən] respiratory -> [rɛspətori] spectrogram -> [spɛktəgræm] governor -> [gʌvənər] surprise -> [səprajz] |
|
Epenthesis
|
Process of inserting a segment within a string of segments. Often happens with vowels.
prince [prɪnts] warmth [wormpθ] Transition from sonorant to obstruent is eased by insertion of a consonant which shares articulatory properties of each segment. |
|
Phonetic Processes
*Metathesis* |
Reordering of segments; very common in children.
Favre [farv] apple [apəl] prescription [pərscrɪpʃən] ask [æks] |
|
Phonetic Processes
*Vowel reduction* |
When articulation moves more central in unstressed position
|
|
Phonetic Processes
*Progressive assimilation* |
(a real example)
trial [tr̻ajl̩] pliers [pl̻ajərz] cry [kr̻aj] play [pl̻ej] prior [pr̻ajər] Liquids /r/ and /l/ are voiceless after voiceless stops; ie the voiced consonants take on the voiceless feature of the preceding segment. |
|
Other vowels to know
(non-English) |
/y/ High front rounded tense
/ʏ/ High front rounded lax /ø/ Mid front rounded tense /œ/ Mid front rounded lax /ɔ/ Mid back rounded lax /ɯ/ High back unrounded tense |
|
Vowel diacritics to know
*Length* |
Found in Czech, Latin, Cree, Finnish, Estonian…
Marked with colon [v:] [i] vs. [i:] [a] vs [a:] [o] vs. [o:] |
|
Vowel diacritics to know
*Nasalization* |
Found in French, Michif, Hindi, Irish, Yoruba…
Marked with tilde [ṽ] [ɛ] vs [ɛ̃] [œ] vs [œ̃] [ɔ] vs [ɔ̃] [ɪ] vs [ɪ̃] |
|
Consonants to know
|
[q] [ɢ] Uvular stops
[ɸ] [ß] Bilabial fricatives [x] [ɤ] Velar fricatives [ɲ] Palatal nasal |
|
Phonetics vs. phonology
|
Phonetics:
describes concrete physical properties of sounds Phonology: investigates systemic patterning of sounds, within one language and cross-lingustically. |
|
Major phonological units
|
Syllable
Segment Feature |
|
The segment
|
Speech is divided into segments, which is what we show in phonetic transcription.
phonetics [fənɛɾəks] share [ʃɛr] |
|
The syllable
|
Segments combine to form larger units called syllables.
Syllables consist obligatorily of a syllabic segment and often of non-syllabic segments which precede or follow. phonetics [fə.nɛ.ɾəks.] share [ʃɛr.] |
|
The feature
|
Segments are made up of smaller units called features.
Features correspond to articulatory or acoustic categories ʃ -syllabic -sonorant +continuant |
|
Segments in
*contrast* |
Segments contrast when their presence can result in a change in meaning.
pat vs bat vs cat vs mat vs gnat bite vs bat vs but vs bought vs boot Contrast = be distinctive = be in opposition Change in contrastive sound = change in meaning. |
|
Segments NOT in contrast
|
[pat̚ ] vs. [pat] vs. [path]
In Cree, Michif [o] and [u] never contrast: there is only one back vowel which is pronounced either [o] or [u] but always understood/written as [o]. |
|
Minimal pairs
|
Two forms with distinct meanings which differ only by 1 segment, where this segment is in the same position.
[tæp] vs [tæb] are minimal pairs [tæp] vs [bæt] are NOT minimal pairs. |
|
Near-minimal pairs
|
2 forms that have segments in nearly identical environments
author [ɑθər] vs either [ajðər] Often need to resort to near-minimal pairs to establish contrasts, but minimal pairs are always ideal. |
|
Phonemes
|
Segments that contrast are called phonemes.
Phonemes are abstract representations of phones Phones come out of your mouth/are what you hear, but phonemes are in your mind, or what you think you hear. |
|
Notation
|
Phonemic transcription uses / / brackets
Phonetic transcription uses [ ] brackets Phonemic Phonetic /pæt/ [phæt] /mæn/ [mæ̃n] |
|
Vowel contrasts in English
|
Diphthongs are phonetically complex, composed of vowel + glide, but phonemically act as 1 vowel.
No contrast between [e] and [ej] or [o] and [ow]. So for phonemic purposes, we will consider diphthongs [ow], [ej], etc. to be single vowels. |
|
Complementary distribution
|
When 2 segments do not appear in the same environment
H20 superhero with secret civilian identity Hannah Montana/Mylie |
|
Complementary distribution
|
Distribution of [l̻] and [l] in English:
[l] [l̻] After voiceless stops N Y Elsewhere Y N [l] and [l̻] are phonetically different but phonologically the same in English. Ie. [l] and [l̻] are allophones of one phoneme, /l/. |
|
Phonemes & allophones
|
Allophones:
predictable variants that come out of your mouth in a certain phonetic environment Phonemes: Abstract mental representation of the variants; how it is stored in the brain. |
|
Two levels of representation: phonetic and phonemic
|
/phoneme/
[allophone] [allophone] |
|
*Terminology*
|
Phone - allophone - phonetic – phonetics – surface form
Vs. Phoneme - phonemic - phonological – phonology – underlying form |
|
Free variation
|
Final stops in English: aspirated, plain or unreleased variants.
Neither in complementary distribution (ie. occur in same environments) nor minimal pairs with different meanings. = Free variation. |
|
Minimal pairs
Recap |
2 forms with distinct meanings which differ by only 1 segment
I.e. /dowt/ vs /towt/ If we have minimal pairs, we have 2 distinct phonemes: /d/ & /t/ |
|
Complementary distribution
Recap |
When 2 segments only appear in opposite phonetic environments, we say they are in complementary distribution, and they are allophones of 1 phoneme.
/l/ goes to: [l diacritic] and [l] |
|
Generalizing patterns
|
Phonetic processes generally target a phonetic class, not a single segment
Look for generalizations: looking for forest, not trees. State changes in general way for classes of segments undergoing a change. |
|
Generalizing patterns
Recap |
Phonemes:
Constrastive segments in a language, ie they make new words. /l/ Phones/Allophones: Predictable variants of the contrastive phonemes. [l̻] [l] [l̩] Includes all sounds uttered in the language. |
|
How to transcribe?
|
Note that 2 levels means we can transcribe in 2 ways.
Phonemic transcription is what we’ve been doing, mostly. Phonetic transcription includes all predictable processes. /plaw/ vs [pl̻aw] /plænt/ vs [pl̻æ̃nt] |
|
Phonemic transcription
|
Also called broad transcription
Only includes phonemes. I.e., just those segments in English phonemic inventory. (your charts) |
|
Phonetic transcription
|
Also called narrow transcription
More detailed transcription, includes processes. There is much more phonetic detail in a narrow or phonetic transcription |
|
Phonetic transcription
English processes |
Nasalization
Non-nasal sonorant devoicing Canadian raising Flapping |
|
Phonetic and phonemic inventories
|
Inventory = list
Phonemic inventories are the charts from chapter 2, which list the contrastive segments. Phonetic inventories are much larger, as they include all the allophones. |
|
Phonemic vs phonetic stops
|
Phonemic stops in English
/p b t d k g ʔ/ Phonetic stops in English /p ph b t th d k kh g ʔ/ |
|
The Syllable; Revistited pt. 1
|
Composed of segments
Has a structure Governed by both universal and language-specific constraints Can play a role in allophonic variation, i.e. is another phonetic environment to look for. |
|
The Syllable; Revistited pt. 2
|
Consists of a sonorous element as its nucleus, and associated non-sonorous elements
Elements get more sonorous as they reach the nucleus Sonorants: vowels, nasals, liquids, glides Obstruents: stops, fricatives, affricates Prance [præns] Trench [trɛnʧ] |
|
Syllable structure
|
Syllable consists of an onset and rhyme.
Rhyme consists of a nucleus and coda σ= Onset (O) + Rhyme (R) = Nucleus (N) Coda (Co) |
|
The Syllable; Revistited
Syllable tendencies |
Universal tendencies:
Syllable nuclei normally consist of one vowel Syllables normally begin with onsets Syllables often end with codas Onsets and codas are normally 1 consonant |
|
The Syllable; Revistited
Syllable tendencies (2) |
Most common syllables are CV and CVC.
Where C=consonant, V=vowel |
|
Onset constraints
|
Not all consonant sequences are permissible in every language.
French /pnø/ /psikoloʒi/ Russian /fprɔk/ /fstrɛʧa/ Phonotactics is the set of constraints on how segments pattern within syllables; how we form syllables |
|
Accidental gaps
|
Not all possible words exist in a language.
Accidental gaps are non-occurring but possible forms in a language. Strack, prum, snal. |
|
Systemic gaps
|
Not all forms are possible in a given language.
Systemic gaps are those which are impossible given a language’s phonotactics. Considered unacceptable by speakers. /pnø/ /fprɔk/ |
|
Universal general syllable shapes
|
Syllables have onsets
Onsets tend to be as large as possible Nuclei are usually vowels; in the absence of a vowel, another sonorant may do. |
|
Setting up syllables
(4 steps) |
Form the nucleus (find the vowels)
Maximize the onset (based on language-specific phonotactic constraints) Form the coda (any consonants left) Construct the word (syllables form word) |
|
Distribution of English aspirated stops
|
Aspirated stops appear syllable-initially
Unaspirated stops appear elsewhere (elsewhere in syllable, in a coda) |
|
Why we use features
|
Allows us to classify segments
Allows us to generalize Natural classes of sounds: share a feature or features which pattern together. |
|
Obstruent natural classes:
What are different features of obstruents? |
[-sonorant], [±voice], [±continuant].
From these features, we may observe and describe natural classes of segments; I.e. segments which pattern together. |
|
9 natural obstruent classes
|
[-sonorant]
[-sonorant, -continuant] [-sonorant, +continuant] [-sonorant, -voice] [-sonorant, +voice] [-sonorant, -continuant, -voice] [-sonorant, -continuant, +voice] [-sonorant, +continuant, -voice] [-sonorant, +continuant, +voice] |
|
Obstruent natural classes
|
[-sonorant] [p t k b d g f s ʃ v z ʒ]
[-sonorant, -continuant] [p t k b d g] [-sonorant, +continuant][f s ʃ v z ʒ] [-sonorant, -voice] [p t k f s ʃ] [-sonorant, +voice] [b d g v z ʒ] [-sonorant, -continuant, -voice] [p t k] [-sonorant, -continuant, +voice] [b d g] [-sonorant, +continuant, -voice] [f s ʃ] [-sonorant, +continuant, +voice] [v z ʒ] |
|
Feature matrices
|
Features are organized in matrices.
Major class features - consonantal +sonorant + syllabic Laryngeal state + voice Articulation o Dorsal Precise place or articulation + high - low - back tense/lax + tense |
|
Features and allophonic variation
|
Some processes we’ve seen:
Vowel nasalization Liquid & glide devoicing Intervocalic voicing Assimilation processes = change of a feature. |
|
Feature representations
|
Organized into groups reflecting natural classes
Most features are binary [±consonantal] 3 unary features: [LABIAL] [CORONAL] [DORSAL] |
|
Major class features:
[±consonantal] |
Glides, vowels, /h/ & /ʔ/ are [-consonantal].
|
|
Major class features
[±syllabic] |
Sounds which may be syllable nuclei are [+syllabic].
|
|
Major class features
[±sonorant] |
Sonorants are [+sonorant]: nasals, liquids, glides, vowels.
|
|
Manner features
[±continuant] |
Sounds with free airflow are [+continuant].
|
|
Manner features
[±delayed release] |
Affricates are [+del rel].
|
|
Manner features
[±nasal] |
Sounds produced with open velum are [+nasal].
|
|
Manner features
[±lateral] |
Varieties of /l/ are [+lateral].
|
|
Laryngeal features
[±voice] |
Voiced sounds are [+voice];
voiceless are [-voice] |
|
Laryngeal features
[±spread glottis] |
Aspirated consonants are [+SG].
|
|
Laryngeal features
[±constricted glottis] |
Sounds produced with closed glottis are [+CG]:
only [ʔ] |
|
Place features
|
Unary features [LABIAL] [CORONAL] [DORSAL] indicate articulator(s).
Each unary feature has specific binary subfeatures. |
|
Place features
[LABIAL] = labial articulator |
[±round]
Rounded vowels & [w] are [+round] Other labial consonants are [-round]. [p b f v] |
|
Place features
[CORONAL] = tongue tip or blade as articulator |
[±anterior]
In front of alveopalatal region = [+ant] Behind alveopalatal region [-ant]. (alveopalatals) [±strident] Noisy fricatives & affricates [+strid] = [s z ʃ ʒ ʧ ʤ] Others = [-strid]. |
|
Place features
[DORSAL] = Body of tongue as articulator |
[±high]
Tongue body is raised from central position. [±low] Tongue body is lowered from central position. (Vowels only, in English) [±back] Tongue body is behind the palatal region. [±tense] [±reduced] |
|
Writing a feature matrix
Determine manner of articulation |
Major class features
[±sonorant], [±consonantal], [±syllabic] Manner features [±nasal], [±cont] If [+son, +cons, -nas], is it [±lat]? If [-son, +cons, -nas], is it [±del rel]? |
|
Writing a feature matrix
Determine laryngeal setting |
Laryngeal features [±voice].
if ʔ, then [+SG]. If aspirated or /h/, then [±CG]. |
|
Writing a feature matrix
Determine place of articulation |
Place features
Which articulator is active? If LABIAL, [±round]? If CORONAL, [±anterior], [±strident]? If DORSAL, [±high], [±back]? If a vowel: [±low], [±tense], [±reduced]? |
|
Recapitulation
Phonemes |
Abstract representations, or what is in a speaker’s mind
|
|
Recapitulation
Phones/Allophones |
phonetic realizations of what is in the speaker’s mind
|
|
Underlying vs surface forms
|
speaker underlyingly has a phoneme in mind, which is produced on the surface as an allophone
undergoes a set of phonological rules phonetic/surface representation is derived form from the underlying phonemic representation in our mind |
|
Underlying vs surface forms...
|
Underlying representation:
mental representation of speaker Surface representation: actual phonetic output Surface representation is the underlying representation after having undergone a set of rules. |
|
Rule ordering
|
Unordered rules: environments are different.
Sometimes applying multiple rules needs to be done in a specific order. |
|
Feeding vs bleeding
|
Feeding: when one rule creates the environment for another rule.
Bleeding: when one rule removes the environment for another rule. |
|
Rule notation
A --> B / X__Y |
A = element in phonemic representation
B = the change it undergoes (referring to features) or output X, Y = conditioning environment. __ = position of segment undergoing the change |
|
Notation
|
# = word boundary
σ = syllable boundary |
|
Assimilation processes
A --> B / X__Y Liquid devoicing |
A: what is the changing element?
B: what is the change? X, Y: what is the environment __: what is the segment’s position? |
|
Assimilation processes
A --> B / X__Y Aspiration |
A: what is the element?
B: what is the change? X, Y: what is the environment __: what is the segment’s position? |
|
Deletion & epenthesis
Schwa deletion: English speakers may drop [ə] in open syllable preceding a stressed syllable. |
[ə] --> ∅ / C0 _ σ C0
[+stress] |
|
What is historical linguistics?
again |
the description and explanation of language change
Syntactic, morphological, semantic, phonological. |
|
Language change
|
All languages change over time.
Ex. Three periods of English: Old English (450-1100) Middle English (1100-1500, i.e. Chaucer) Modern English (1500 to present) |
|
Language change, more
|
Is inevitable
Is systematic, ie based on linguistic principles and affects natural classes. i.e. Canadian raising Occurs in every language |
|
Motivation for language change
Language internal |
Motivated by systemic linguistic principles.
Similar types of change happen across language families, based on articulatory or syntactic or semantic principles. |
|
Motivation for language change
Language external |
Catalyst is society, history, language policy.
|
|
Language-internal causes
Simplification |
Articulatory, morphological, etc.
Old English: ganra > gandra ‘gander’; simle > simble ‘always’ Modern English: Whom, thou-thee-thy-thine Flip side: complication, ie. making new distinctions. (primarily morphological |
|
Language-internal causes
Analogy |
languages prefer regularity over irregularity.
Mouse, louse, house. (plurality) Sing, swing, sting, bring. (time tense) Dive (forms) |
|
Language-internal causes
Reanalysis |
attributing a complex structure where there is/was none
Kleenex cerise - cherise - cherries - cherry hamburger |
|
Language-external causes
|
Language contact
Borrowing Lexical & phonological /ŋ/ |
|
Language-external causes of language change
|
Spelling pronunciation: writing systems are more stable than pronunciation.
often assume/assure |
|
More
Language-external causes |
Hypercorrection: overgeneralization of a rule.
English pronouns: myself, I. |
|
Phonetic vs. phonological change
|
First stage of a sound change: creation of allophones.
= phonetic sound change leads to splits, mergers or shifts; changes in a phonological system. |
|
Splits
|
allophones of one phoneme come to contrast with each other.
one change, then another which obscures the predictability of the original change then-thyn split of Old English /θ/ into /ð/ & /θ/ in Early Middle English. ŋ |
|
Mergers
|
two phonemes no longer contrast with each other.
Michif: French /o/ & /u/ > /o/ Cockney English: /θ/ & /f/ > /f/ North American English: /w/ & /ʍ/ > /w/ Canadian English, Midwest U.S.: /ɔ/ /ɑ/ merger Hong Kong English /s/ /ʃ/ > /ʃ/ |
|
Shift
|
organization of a series of phonemes within the phonological system is changed.
|
|
Great Vowel Shift
|
Affected English long vowels
took place in south of England 1450 to 1750 |
|
Great Vowel Shift, more
|
Standardisation of English spelling ~ 15th & 16th centuries
Spellings that made sense in Middle English pronunciation are retained in Modern English Without vowel shift, vowels would sound much like they ‘should’ in IPA. (boot, beet, bead, bite, etc.) |
|
Why do vowels shift?
|
Possibly due to phonological vowel space.
Tendency is for equally distributed vowels within trapezoid. Diphthongization to reduce complex system. |
|
Sound change
|
Sound changes mirror phonological changes
Start off subtly, ie the phonological processes that we saw last section, and become significant over time. |
|
Language change
i, ii, iii |
Sequential change: involve sequences of segments for articulatory reasons.
Segmental change: change of segment for articulatory reasons. Auditorily based change: based on audition. |
|
Sequential change
|
Most common:
Assimilation (varia) Dissimilation Epenthesis Metathesis Weakening & deletion (varia) Consonant strengthening |
|
Sequential change: Assimilation Place assimilation
|
Early Latin inpossibilis --> Latin impossibilis
|
|
Sequential change: Assimilation
Palatalization & affrication: |
alveolar, dental & velar stops before front vowels & /j/.
|
|
Sequential change: Assimilation
Affrication |
/t, k/ --> ts /d, g/ --> dz
Canadian French /t, k/ --> ʧ /d, g/ --> ʤ Métis French French [kø], [ky] --> Métis French [ʧø], [ʧy] |
|
Sequential change: Assimilation
Nasalization |
vowels becoming nasalized due to adjacent consonant, then consonant deletion.
Latin --> French bon --> bɔ̃ fin --> fɛ̃ |
|
Sequential change: Assimilation
Manner assimilation |
slæ̃pde --> later Old English slæ̃pte
|
|
Sequential change: Assimilation
|
Most common type of change.
|
|
Sequential change: Assimilation
Total assimilation |
Latin octo, septem --> Italian otto, sette
|
|
Sequential change: Assimilation
Umlaut |
vowel change due to vowel in another syllable.
|
|
Sequential change: Dissimilation
|
Latin --> Spanish
anma --> alma arbor --> arbol |
|
Sequential change: Epenthesis
|
Vowel epenthesis:
breaks up difficult consonant clusters. Latin schola, scribere --> Spanish escuela, escribir |
|
Sequential change: Metathesis
|
Change in positioning of segments
English bryd, hros, waps --> bird, horse, wasp Cajun French grenier > [gərnje] prenait > [pərnɛ] vendredi >[vɑ̃dərdi] |
|
Sequential change: Weakening and deletion
|
Consonantal and vowel
Natural progression until deletion |
|
Sequential change: consonant weakening
|
Scale of consonant weakening:
Strongest geminate voiceless stops voiceless stops voiced stops/voiceless fricatives voiced fricatives nasals liquids glides Weakest |
|
Sequential change: Rhotacism
|
consonant changes into an /r/
|
|
Sequential change: strengthening
|
Glide strengthening
Latin --> Italian iuvenis [j] --> giovane [ʤ] |
|
Segmental change
Deaffrication |
turns affricates into fricatives
|
|
Auditorily-based change
|
Substitution: replacement of a segment by another similar-sounding segment
|
|
Language reconstruction
|
systemic phonetic correspondences are the most reliable sign of family relationships
by systematically comparing genetically related languages, may reconstruct an earlier form words descended from a common source = cognates |
|
Reconstruction strategies
|
Phonetic plausibility (first & foremost)
Majority rules: if no plausible change can account for differences. |
|
Common sound changes
|
ie. highly plausible
Palatalization t > ʧ / __i Assimilation n > m / _b Voicing t > d / V_V Frication d > ð / V_V consonant deletion k > ∅ / __# Opposites are very unlikely – do not correspond to any usual change. |
|
Indo-European
...language family... |
by studying phonetic correspondences, linguists have ascertained that most languages of Europe, Persia, and the northern part of India belong to a single family called Indo-European
|
|
Grimm’s law
|
series of sound shifts differentiating Proto-Germanic from other Indo-European languages.
(exception: voiceless stops following /s/) |
|
Exceptions to Grimm’s law
|
borrowings
Eg. pedestrian, tenuous /f/, /θ/ expected, but borrowed directly from French/Latin. reconstruction can be complicated by borrowings, esp. given Latin & French also come from PIE. |