• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/33

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

33 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
social class
classification of speakers on the basis of social divisions= Status and power
objective markers to social status differneces
income
level of education
value of property.house
subjective markers of social status differences
occupations
neighborhood
family name
socially prestigious
variants are positively valued throguh their association with high status groups
socially stigmatized
variants that carry negative connotations
Covert v. Overt prestige
covert- Sarah Palin= used with local values
Overt- Hilary Clinton= broad norms
changes from above
level of consciousness- led my lower middle class- reflects a movement away fro socially sstigmatized features
changes from below
led by Upper working class- mostly phonological changes in American English tend to start from below
EX: Cali shift and NCS
style
one of the speech varieties used by an individual
style shift
when a speaker voluntarily changes speech forms b/c of setting, topic, or other speakers
Types of style shifts
-registers= associated w. particular situations of use= Motherese

-genres= associated w. performance or artistic display= Actors

-crossing=shift into another dialect other than your own

-codeswitching= spanglish, NCS to standard
hypercorrection
members of lower social classes will use prestigious features at a higher rate than high classes= they over-use it
Attention to speech
Attention to speech= change based on the amount of attention they're paying to speech
-casual v. careful

Paralingx Cues= cues surrounding speech to separate casual and careful
-rate, pitch, laughter
Audience Design
shift styles primarily in response to their audience
- topic and the relationship between speakers affects this
direct addressee
2nd person you talk to, leads to the must adjustment in speech
auditors
allowed to participate in conversations, but not addressed
overhearers
non-ratified, speaker is aware of prescence but not part of convo really at all
eavesdroppers
presence is unknown and not ratified
speaker design
-style shifts viewed as means of projecting ones own attributes (identity)
- your identity is dynamic
- in conversational interaction we take on roles and those roles change
factors in speaker design
audience
topic
purpose
key
frame of interaction
Eckert 1988
Jocks and Burnouts
-working class bringing linguistical changes
methodology of eckert
3 years or research
used 52 speakers
used 1 suburban school which was almost all white
Jocks from Eckert 1988
involved in school
-valued their relationships w. adults
-trusted by administration
-looked to go to college
Burn-outs from Eckert 1988
-vocational
-blue collar
-network with other groups and ages
-use drugs and sex early on
-restricted authority by admin.
in betweens from the Eckert 1988 article
hang out with both groups
are the reason for the change
-use variants of burn-outs, bring them to the jock
-the variants lose significance for the burn outs
Conclusions of Eckert
in HS, there is a motivation for divergence
-complex relationship between social category, affiliation, class and metro environment in suburbs
Schilling-Estes 1998
Study in Ocracoke- island off the coast of NC
-Studies performance speech of Rex- called the "brogue"
-increased tourism has residents coming in contact withs tandard
methodology of Schilling-Estes
case study of 1 individual- Rex
-Detailed study of him across various social contexts
-based on phrase "hoi tide..."
Linguistic features of Rex- Shilling
Lifelong resident
-Strong ties with island
-performance utterances characterized by linguistic features
Results of Shilling-Estes
found more /ay/ centralization in performance speech
-Mostly before voiced obstruents
-Patterns of self-conscious speech are just as regular as that of non-self conscious speech
Labov's Vernacular principle
self conscious speech is not valuable in obtaining a pic of the lingx system
findings of Shilling-Estes 1998
shifts can be multi-dimensional= changing a tape for recording could create performance speech b/c of attention to speech and audience design theories
Limitations of Shilling-Estes 1998
only 1 participant
one used a few styles to look at
very few tokens of /ay/
Why not study other brogue features?