Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
23 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
What is the common knowledge Effect?
|
Commonly held information is more influential on group decisions, compared to unique information.
* Common information impacts the initial preferences of more team members before the meeting * Common information is more likely to be introduced at the meeting, simply because more people have this information * Common information is more likely to be repeated in conversation * As team converges on an answer, there is a norm of not bringing up new facts |
|
What is a reason a team might not reach its potential due to Common Knowledge effect?
|
* Unique or divergent opinions are not shared
|
|
What is the Fundamental Attribution error?
|
* External forces (situation, system) often have a profound effect on behavior and performance
* We typically attribute people's actions and success/failure to their personal qualities * Underestimating the power of the situation i.e. Good Samaritan Situation |
|
What is the danger of a narrow perspective? How can teams overcome this?
|
* We become overconfident and may miss critical insights into solving a problem.
* Teams and organizations can overcome this problem by bringing together diverse knowledge and perspectives. How well this is done depends on the situation/system. |
|
What factors influence whether a compensation package should be contingent on performance?
|
* Observability - if effort is easily observable, then better to observe
* Measure-ability of performance - Desired output better be measurable. Its folly to hope for A, while rewarding for B * Employee's Controllability - If effort imperfectly determines measures then it makes effort risky * Perceptions of firms reliability - if measurement is tied imperfectly to compensation, then it makes effort risky |
|
What are some obstacles to contingent rewards?
|
* Inflated perceptions of Contribution
* Procedural fairness * PFP shifts risks to employees. Because employees are typically risk-averse, the extra incentive doesn't come for free * imperfect links between effort, measurement, and compensation |
|
What are the aspects of Intrinsic Motivation?
|
* Meaningfulness
** Skill variety (use different skills in work) ** Task identity (see whole process, final product) ** Task significance (make a useful contribution to others) * Responsibility ** Autonomy * Knowledge of results ** Feedback |
|
How can extrinsic motivation hurt intrinsic motivation?
|
* Signals task must be "work", not "interesting"
* Signals employer doesn't trust work to be carried out without incentive * Shifts thinking to narrow benefit-cost calculations - "Whats in it for me" |
|
When should an organization use intrinsic rewards?
|
* Intrinsic is especially important if the things you desire cannot be easily measured
|
|
What are the benefits and drawbacks to a Functional Organizational Design?
|
* Local knowledge passed up, decisions passed down
* Efficiencies from specialization * Reliance from supervision above * Functional myopia(short sighted) narrow interests and incentives |
|
What are the benefits and drawbacks to a Divisional Organizational Design?
|
* Improves coordination within division, complicates coordination between divisions
* Fewer economies of scale (more redundancy of effort, less specialization) * More autonomy, profit interests pushed down to the level of division head |
|
What are some common issues with Matrix Organizational Structures?
|
* Often mistaken as a panacea
* Best when cross-group coordination is vital * Introduces many problems ** Increased coordination costs ** Rivalry between bosses ** Not stable, one boss tends to exert more power, even if informally |
|
What are some issues of Centralization vs Decentralization Org Structures?
|
* Centralization favors execution
** Efficient execution of a current competency *** Direction from Above, economies of scale *** Low responsiveness, less autonomy *** Deeper specialization *** Better capture of ideas * Decentralization favors execution, exploration ** The ability to experiment and adapt *** Independent units, redundancy of effort *** High responsiveness to changing market *** More autonomy at lower levels *** Broader perspective *** More variation of ideas |
|
What is culture? What are the "Norms"?
|
* Culture is a shared set of beliefs, values, and norms.
* Norms are socially created expectations about behavior, that characterize what is acceptable & desirable vs what is not. Dictates how people behave when not watched |
|
What are some widely recognized and under-appreciated objectives of Culture?
|
Widely:
* Identity - via similarity, common fate * Pride - via elitism, in-group favoritism * Enjoyment - SAS ("happy"), SWA ("fun") Under appreciated * Selection - strong cultures facilitate good matches * Coordination - substitutes for formal controls |
|
How is culture a selection mechanism?
|
* Interviews are based predictors of performance.
* Better: Self-selection based on match between personal preferences and job/organizational attributes (type of work, teachers intrisic, risk-tolerance LE, non-monetary SAS) * Most effective when costly to join ** Anybody can say they fit a certain culture, most credible when they give up something to attain it (ex SWA pays less) |
|
How is culture an informal control system?
|
* If we agree on socially acceptable behavior when we are working together, we will effectively control eachother
* Internalization - If the employee sufficiently buys into the organizations norms and values, then they will guide their behavior when unobserved. This allows decentralization and autonomy |
|
Greatest internalization is achieved by initial commitments that are:
|
* Effortful/active
* public * voluntary * made with little or no inducement |
|
What are two ways for maintaining culture?
|
* Selection
* Socialization - Social influence, commitment and consistency. Ex: hazing, bootcamp |
|
What are the benefits and costs of culture?
|
Processes that create the internalization of the culture are more expensive initially, but can reduce ongoing monitoring and measurement costs.
|
|
What are some common traps in decision making?
|
* We define problems too narrowly (tent example)
* We generate an incomplete list of objectives (internship example) * How we judge the goodness or badness of "X" depends on what it's compared to (Salary depends on peers salary) * We find tradeoffs difficult, so we use simple rules to decide (economist subscriptions) * We systematically underestimate uncertainty(draw inference from small samples, mutual funds, israeli pilot) * We are overconfident |
|
What are some remedies to the traps in decision making?
|
* Make a habit of asking critical questions
* Use models to decide * Use teams to generate multiple perspectives |
|
What are two elements needed for good group decision making?
|
* Cognitive diversity (for decision making) and team cohesion (for implementation)
|