• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/26

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

26 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Plessy vs. Ferguson
"separate but equal"
Smith vs. Allwright
outlaws white primary
Shelly vs. Kramer
court said the state had no interest in forcing housing contracts
contracts keeping blacks out of neighborhoods deemed unconstitutional
Sweat vs. Painter
first major blow to "separate but equal" precedent
U of Texas' attempt at creating black only law school deemed unconstitutional
Brown vs. Board of education of Topeka
supersedes Plessy
says separate is inherently unequal, especially in education
Regents of the University of California vs. Bakke
if you do not get into a school but are qualified and got rejected because of the quota, it is unconstitutional
Barron vs. Baltimore
supreme court held that the bill of rights could only apply to federal gov't
rendered bill of rights almost meaningless because most concerns at the time were with the state and local governments
Schneck vs. United States
"clear and present danger"
if there is a "clear and present danger", speech is not protected
Stromberg vs. California
first time unfavorable speech was defended
teacher told students to pledge allegiance to the Soviet Union
was not creating a "clear and present danger"
Texas vs. Johnson
flag burning considered a right of freedom of speech
Roth vs. United States
case further defined obscenity
a work is "obscene" when it is "utterly and without social redeem or importance to community standards"
Miller vs. California
local community standards
deemed that sale and distribution of obscene materials unconstitutional
Near vs. Minnesota
freedom of the press
except in rare cases, censorship is unconstitutional
NY Times Co. vs. United States
made it possible for NY times & Washington post newspapers to publish then-classified pentagon papers without risk of government censorship and punishment
Lemon vs. Kurtzman
legislation concerning religion
statute must have a secular legislative purpose
statute must neither enhance nor inhibit religion
statute must not foster an excessive government entanglement with religion
Engel vs. Vitale
school prayer
ruled it unconstitutional for state officials to compose an official school prayer and encourage its recitation in public schools
School district of Abington township vs. Schempp
declared school-sponsored Bible readings in public schools unconstitutional
Cantwell vs. Connecticut
freedom of religion
applied to states, through due process clause (14th amendment), the first amendment's protection of religious free exercise
Mapp vs. Ohio
evidence in violation of the 14th amendment, which protects against "unreasonable search and seizures", may not be used in court
Miranda vs. Arizona
miranda rights
against self-incrimination
Gideon vs. Wainwright
right to counsel and impartial jury of peers
poor defendants deserve representation
Griswold vs. Connecticut
married women entitled to contraception
Eisenstadt vs. Baird
single women entitled to contraception
Roe vs. Wade
established a woman's right to choose whether to have an abortion
Lawrence vs. Texas
sodomy laws
made same-sex sexual activity legal in every U.S. state and territory
D.C. vs. Heller
2nd amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm for traditionally lawful purposes like self defense, within home and federal enclaves