Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
69 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Agent Authority
|
• Carry firearms
• Serve warrants and subpoenas • Arrest for federal crimes with a warrant • Arrest for federal crimes in agent's presence. • Arrest for federal felonies with probable cause. |
|
Legal Test for Interference with 1st Amendment Rights
|
1) sufficiently compelling interest.
2) Govmt's interest outweights individual interest. 3) Least restrictive manner possible. |
|
Authentication and Identification of Evidence
|
• "it is what it is"
• chain of custody |
|
Hearsay Exceptions
|
• Statements by defendant offered by govmt
• Excited utterances • Public/business records • Prior sworn testimony • Dying declaration • Statements against interest |
|
Clergy Privilege
|
• Must be actual clergy of an established religion
• As capacity of spiritual advisor • Sought for "spiritual relief from sin", not consultation on other matters. |
|
Therapist Privilege
|
• Must be a licensed psychotherapist
• Only communications made in course of diagnosis. |
|
Exceptions to Marital Privileges
|
• Evidence related to crimes jointly committed
• Threats against witness spouse |
|
Confidential Marriage Communication Privilege
|
• Protects confidential communications during marriage
• Defendant may prevent spouse from testifying • Survives termination of marriage • Does not apply to evidence, only to actual communications made during marriage |
|
Adverse Spouse Privilege
|
• Protects current spouse from compelled testimony
• Does not survive termination of marriage. • Applies to evidence /and/ communications • Does not require confidentiality |
|
Attorney-client Privileges
|
• Belongs to client
• Legal advice communication and communication related to that purpose • Must be made in confidence • EXCEPTIONS: - must reveal future criminal activity |
|
Government Privilege
|
• "qualified privilege"
- court may order disclosure if defendant shows disclosure is necessary and the need outweights the govmt's interest of non-disclosure. • Examples - state secrets - sensitive investigative techniques - deliberative process - informants - investigative files |
|
Privileges
|
• Privileged info not admissable
• Types - Attorney-client - Marital - Psychotherapist-patient - Clergy-communicant - Governmental privilege No privileges: - Physician-patient - Accountant-client - Parent-child |
|
"Best Evidence" Rule
|
• Best evidence available must be presented in Court.
|
|
Writing Used to Refresh Witness Memory
|
If used while testifying, then must be given to the other side.
|
|
Impeachment of Witnesses
|
• Attacking credibility
• Prior convictions - Any felony in past 10 years - Any misdemeanors involving dishonesty in past 10 years. • Prior statements - Doesn't need to be shown to witness prior to testimony. |
|
Witness Compentency
|
• Must be fit and legally qualified
• Must have "personal knowledge" • EXCEPTION: - "Expert witnesses" |
|
Defendant's Prior Criminal History
|
• Offered only if it tends to show Defendant committed the crime.
• Ex: same MO, proof of motive |
|
Character Evidence
|
• generally inadmissable
• Defense must broach, then govmt may present character evidence. |
|
Relevant Evidence
|
• Any tendency to make the existence of any material fact more or less probable.
• Must be relevant to be admissable. • Relevant and inadmissable - Exclusionary Rule Evidence - Unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, undue delay, waste of time, needless cumulative evidence |
|
Circumstantial Evidence
|
• Jury must draw inference to answer question at hand
• Snow example |
|
Rules of Evidence in Pretrial Phases
|
• Rules of evidence do not apply during pretrial phases
- warrants - grand jury testimony - intitial appearances - preliminary hearings • EXCEPTION: - marital privilege |
|
Discovery
|
• Statutory Requirements
- Statements by Defendant - Defendant's arrest record - Access to physical evidence - Results of scientific tests - List of expert witnesses and testimony - Prior statements of witnesses • Due Process Requirements: - exculpatory evidence |
|
Juvenile Arrests
|
• Under 18 at time of arrest
• To magistrate "forthwith" - no processing - may question juvenile prior to arrest. |
|
Federal Jury
|
• 12 members
• Challenges - unlimited for cause - specific # of peremptory challenges. |
|
Pretrial Phase
|
• Change of venue
• Suppression Motions - exclusionary rule - govmt can appeal to Circuit Ct |
|
Arrests Outside District of Crime
|
• Intial Appearance in district of arrest
- judge advises on Rule 20 • Preliminary Hearing - establish PC and ID - then ship to district • Rule 20 - subject may stay in district of arrest if: (1) subject waives right to trial in district of crime (2) pleas guilty and accept sentence (3) both USAs agree (4) Indictment or Information filed |
|
First Amendment
|
• "four freedoms"
• Not absolute, subject to reasonable regulation • Govmt must demonstrate compelling interest to interfere. • Must demonstrate govmt interest outweighs individual interests • Must use least restrict manner possible |
|
Application of Deadly Force
|
• Only to bring imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to a halt
• Continue application until threat eliminated • Assess whether danger to 3rd parties outweighs the benefit of deadly force |
|
Probably Cause is the level of proof for...
|
• All arrests
• Use of deadly force • Issuance of arrest or search warrant • Warrantless searches • Issuance of ELSUR |
|
FBI Arrest Authority for non-federal crimes
|
• No federal authority to arrest of non-federal crimes
• FBI Policy: intervene when a serious crime (felony or violent misdemeanor) has been committed in agent's presence /and/ action necessary to prevent injury, escape, or property damage. |
|
Use of Force Threat Assessment
|
• SA respond to threat of violence, not actual violence
• SA does not have to wait for actual assault |
|
Exclusionary Rule Govmt Defenses
|
• Standing - rights of actual subject invoking rule must be violated
• Good Faith Reliance of Warrant - SA reasonably believed warrant was valid • Inevitable discovery - evidence would have been discovered inevitably • Independent Source - same evidence would have been legally obtained from an independent source. |
|
Sources of Information Leading to Probable Cause
|
• Firsthand
- see, hear, smell, feel • Hearsay - credibility of source (type of source, source's track record, corroboration) - reliability of information (level of detail, how did source get information, corroboration) |
|
Definition of Probably Cause
|
• A reasonable belief
• that something is probably true • based on all available facts and circumstances and the inferences drawn from them |
|
Illinois v Gates
|
• Look at "totality of circumstances" when determining Probable Cause
• Practical, commonsense decision |
|
Parties to a Federal Crime
|
• Principal
- whoever commits, aids, abets, counsels, commands, or induces • Accessory After the Fact - knowing offence committed, helps principal avoid arrest, trial, or punishment. - up to 1/2 of term established for principal |
|
5th Amendment
|
• Right to grand jury indictment
• Double jeopardy prohibition • No self-incrimination • Due process - govmt must "play fair" |
|
Indictment
|
• FGJ's charging document
• Conclusive determination of Probable cause • Negates requirement for preliminary hearing • Written statement outlining crucial facts of case • Must be used in a capital case, in a non-capital case a defendant can waive the requirement, for a misdemeanor its the govmt option |
|
Federal Criminal Jurisdiction
|
• Act outside state jurisdiction
- high seas, airports, federal property • Acts against federal govmt - assaulting SA, theft of govmt property • Acts affecting interstate commerce |
|
Deadly Force: Is it Necessary?
|
• Necessity based on reasonable belief that subject poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to agent or another person.
|
|
4th Amendment
|
• Unreasonable searches and seizures
• No warrants unless probable causes supported by oath • Warrants must particularly describe place to search |
|
Defenses based on Govmt Misconduct
|
• Entrapment
• Due Process Violation • Exclusionary Rule |
|
Negligence if Acting Within SA's Scope of Duty
|
• Absolute Immunity
|
|
Federal Misdemeanors vs. Felonies
|
• Misdemeanor - punishable 1 year or less
• Felony - punishable for more than 1 year |
|
Article II of Constitution
|
- Creates executive branch
|
|
14th Amendment
|
• No state law can abridge federal rights ("Privileges and Immunities")
• Equal protection under law • States must exercise "due process" |
|
Elements of a Crime
|
• Physical Act
• Mental State ("knowingly", "with malice") |
|
Deadly Force Policy Amendments
|
• Not just to stop fleeing suspect
• Not used just to disable moving vehicles • Verbal warnings, if feasable • No warning shots • Agent's trained in other alternative methods for handing resisting subjects |
|
Article VI of the Consititution
|
• Contains Supremacy Clause
|
|
Arrest Warrant
|
• Probable Cause to believe:
- offense was committed - defendant committed offense • Issued by Magistrate if a complaint is filed • Issued by Clerk of Ct. if Indictment filled |
|
Arraignment
|
• Defendant given copy of formal charge and asked to enter plea
• Held before District Court Judge |
|
6th Amendment
|
• Speedy trial
• Public trial • Imparital jury • Informed of nature of charge • Confrontation of witnesses • Compusory process • Right to counsel |
|
Defenses under Bivens Act
|
• I didn't do it
• Qualified immunity: actions were reasonable in that: 1) not clearly known right or law /or/ 2) agent's actions were objectively reasonable |
|
Graham v. Connor
|
• "reasonableness" of use of force judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer at the scene
• Consider split-second judgements, in tense, uncertain, and rapidly evolving environments. |
|
Bivens Action
|
• Lawsuit against SA for violating consitutional right or statutory provision
• Plaintiff must allege actions were intentional or grossly negligent • DOJ representation 1) was action within scope of duty? 2) Is it in govmt's best interest to represent agent? |
|
Due Process Defense
|
• Outrageous govmt conduct violating due process and fundamental fairness
|
|
Federal Grand Jury
|
• 18 month term, extendable 6 months
• 23 jurors |
|
Rule 6(e)
|
• FGJ secrecy
• Binds everyone except witness |
|
Search Warrant
|
• Court order to search particular place at a particular time
• Good only in district issued • Good for 10 days maximum • Normally executed between 6am and 10pm |
|
Nature of Imminent Danger
|
PC to believe:
1. Possesses a weapon or attempting to gain access to one. Intent to use it. 2. Armed and running to gain cover. 3. Capable of inflicting death, incapacitation, or serious injury w/o weapon. Intent to use it. 4. Escape from violent confrontation which subject attempted to inflict death or serious injury. |
|
Exclusionary Rule Defense
|
• Evidence seized in violation of Consitution
• Purpose: to prevent police misconduct • "fruit from poisonous tree" |
|
Preliminary Hearing
|
• w/i 14 days if in custody, 21 days in not in custody.
• Govmt established PC before Magistrate Judge • Both sides present witnesses and evidence • Rules of evidence do not apply • Only in cases of no indictment/information |
|
Initial Appearance
|
• Defendant's first court appearance after arrest, normally with Magistrate
• Within "reasonable time", ie 6 hours • 5 Disclosures - nature of charge - right to counsel - right of silence - right to preliminary hearing - conditions of pretrial bond |
|
Complaint
|
• Agent's charging document
• Written statement of essential facts of offense • Made under oath before Magistrate • Basis of arrest warrant or summons |
|
Information
|
• USA's charging document
• Available if indictment waived by Defendant • Normally used as part of guilty plea |
|
Substantive v. Procedural Law
|
• Substantive - defines what acts are criminal
• Procedual - outline rules of court procedures and investigations. |
|
Use of Force: Is it Reasonable
|
• SA must choose "reasonable option", not "least restrictive option"
• Most "unreasonable" uses occur when there is no longer a threat. |
|
FBI Arrest Authority for Federal Crimes
|
• With arrest warrant
• Federal crime committed in agent's presence. • Federal felony not in presence if agent has probable cause to believe person committed the offence. |
|
Entrapment
|
• Govmt intitiated criminal conduct of non predisposed person
1) govmt induced affirmative act 2) non-predisposed person • Non-predisposed person defense brings into play: - previous convictions/arrests - willingness of subject - post-offence conduct |