• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/7

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

7 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Zimbardo’s Simulation of a Prison
- Random selection for guard or prisoner role.
- Participants deindividuated:
1. Guards: Glasses, uniforms, night stick.
2. Prisoners: Hair, numbers, same dress.
- Personality testing:
1. Screen for mental problems.
2. Predict behavior as guard or prisoner.
Criticisms of Prison Simulation
- Guards & prisoners just playing expected roles.
- Expectations study.
- Expected role excluded physical abuse.
Ongoing nature of “real” prisons.
- Situation determines the outcome.
- Prisons have riots, etc. because of the environment, not the individual
My Lai massacre
- the mass murder unarmed citizens in South Vietnam
- entirely civilians and some of them women and children, conducted by U.S. Army forces on March 16, 1968.
- only William Calley was convicted. He served three years of his life sentence.
- Wallace interviewed participant who said he did it just because he was ordered to
Milgram's experiments at Yale
- experimenter, teacher, learner - learner is trained to react in a certain way - teacher is told they will shock the learner for mistakes, increasing voltage
⁃ If teacher refuses, experimenter has a set of things that he says to get them to continue before the experiment is over
⁃ predicted that as intensity increases, less of the subjects will still be obedient
⁃ people were much more obedient than expected, administered even high level shocks just because they were told to
Factors affecting the degree of obedience
The prestige of Yale - 40%
Women as “teachers” - 65%
- In other cultures - mostly around 60% or a little higher - Australia only 28% were fully compliant
Why do we underestimate the impact of situational variables?
⁃ a sense of self across time and place (I'm always the same person)
⁃ controlling stimuli not obvious
⁃ situationally controlled people seen as weak
⁃ little experience with highly compelling situations