• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/41

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

41 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Tenant is protected from interference with his possession and quiet enjoyment of the property. This is an implied covenant.
Kenny v Preen (1963)
Illegal for landlord to deprive tenant of occupation without belief and reasonable cause that tenant had ceased to live there
PFEA77, s1(2)
Illegal for landlord with intent to evict or block rights/remedies to interfere with peace/comfort or withdraw services
PFEA77, s1(3)
Regular excessive noise can be substantial interference with enjoyment but can't apply to things from before grant of tenancy
Southward LBC v Mills (2001)
LL must repair exterior, including remedying defects in construction
Ravensreft Properties v Davstone (1980)
LL must be notified of qualifying defect to be obliged to fix it
O'Brien v Robinson
Defect must be genuine disrepair, not just minor inconveniences
Quick v Taff Ely BC (1986)
After an assignment, the benefit of a covenant by the original landlord that “touches and concerns” the land runs with the lease. The burden of a covenant by the original tenant that touches and concerns the land also runs with the term
Spencer's Case (1583)
Modern paraphrase of Spencer's Case
CoL Corporation v Fell (1994)
Impossible to go by analogy wrt covenants; rules are arbitrary and distnctions illogical
Grant v Edmonson (1931)
Touches and concerns test:
– Covenant benefits LL or T only while they hold the estate
– Covenant affects the nature, quality, mode of user or value of the land
– Not expressed in reference to specific persons
– OK to be related to paying money only if related to doing something to the land
P&A Swift Investments v Combined English (1989)
A covenant the value of which is entirely due to the actual use of the land is “collateral”, so does not touch and concern
Thomas v Hayward (1869)
No general rule that every covenant, however oblique the connection to ones that concern the land also concern the land
Hua Chiao v Chiaphua
Where one person discharges the liability of another, he may seek to recover the he has paid from the person whose liability it was
Moule v Garrett (1872)
Landlords must fully satisfy themselves that they are acting in accordance with Article 8 and Article 1, 1st protocol when using the self-help remedy of distress
Fuller v Happy Shopper Markets (2001)
- Such as may be reasonably thought arising from the breach or;
- Such as is in the contemplation of the parties
Hadley v Baxendale (1854)
Ancient common law right for a tenant to set off the cost of repairs for which a landlord is liable against future rent payments; must be a fixed sum
Taylor v Beal (1591)
Modern case relying on Taylor v Beal;
It is a question of fact in each case how much of the repairs can be charged
Lee-Parker v Izzet (1971)
Common law forfeiture: landlord demands exact amount on last day it is due and waits till sunset; if still unpaid, he can forfeit the lease
Duppa v Mayo (1669)
LTA27, s19(1)(a)
LL can't unreasonably withold consent to sublet/assign
LTA88, s1
LL must consent or give reasonable refusal in reasonable time
LT(C)A95, s22
For new leases, assigning tenant can be required to enter authorised guarantee agreement
Tenant is protected from interference with his possession and quiet enjoyment of the property
Kenny v Preen
Can include regular excessive noise, but not things done before grant of tenancy
Southward LBC v Mills
PFEA77, s1(2)
Illegal for landlord to deprive tenant of occupation without belief and reasonable cause that tenant had ceased to live there
PFEA77, s1(3)
Illegal for landlord with intent to evict or block rights/remedies to interfere with peace/comfort or withdraw services
LTA85, s11
– LL must keep in good repair and working order:
---- Structure/exterior of the house
---- Water, gas, electricity and sanitation installations (basin/bath/bog) but not other appliances using these things
---- Heating and water heating
LL must repair exterior, including remedying defects in construction
Ravensreft Properties v Davstone
LL must be notified to have obligation
O'Brien v Robinson
Defect must be genuine disrepair, not just minor inconveniences
Quick v Taff
Tenant-like behaviour
– Do those little jobs that a nice good tenant would do...
Warren v Keen (1954)
Limited to bringing action for debt up to six years from the debt being due
Limitation Act 1980, s19
When suing on a AGA, serve the default notice within six months of rent being due
LT(C)A95, s17
Warning - distress flies in the face of Article 8 (privacy and home) and A1 1st protocol (peaceful enjoyment of
Fuller v Happy Shopper
Commercial rent arrears recovery:
Tribunals, Courts and Enforcements Act 2007, Sch 12

Abolishes common law right to distress for non-payment of rent
- rent must be due and payable
- notice served by enforcement agent
- Goods are held until rent paid or goods sold
At common law, landlord must make formal demand on last on which payment is due and wait till sunset
Duppa v Mayo
Peaceable re-entry (not if it's a dwelling and someone lawfully resides)
Protection from Eviction Act 1977, s2
Use or threat of violence even to regain lawful possession is a criminal offence
Criminal Law Act 1977, s6
Hadley v Baxendale
- Such as may be reasonably thought arising from the breach or;
- Such as is in the contemplation of the parties
Ancient common law right for a tenant to set off the cost of repairs for which a landlord is liable against future rent payments; must be a fixed sum
Taylor v Beale
LPA25, s146
See above, but L must serve a s146 notice to tenant; if T does not comply with notice, L may do forfeiture