• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/9

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

9 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Adams (1965)

-equity theory - ratio of inputs/outputs compared to referent other

Colquitt et al. (2001)

-4 diminesions of justice
-1) Adams (1965) equity theory = distributive
-2) Leventhal et al (1980) proposed procedural
-3) Bies & Moag (1986) proposed interactional
-4) Greenberg (1990) split interactional into interpersonal and informational

Greenberg (1987)

-coined term “org justice”

Hausknecht et al. (2004)

-Model says application perceptions come from characteristics of the person and procedure, as well as job characteristics and organizational context


-Poor applicant reactions from test use may be unable to attract top candidates and may be more likely to face litigation or a negative public relations

Latham & Whyte (1994)

-Managers did not base decisions on quantifiable costs and benefits contained in a utility analysis or from an expectancy table


-Information from psychologists was most favorable when confined to straightforward validation procedures


-Consultant skill and experience probably matters

Ryan & Ployhart (2000)

-Applicants’ perceptions of selection procedures and decisions


-Perceptions affected by person (e.g., personality), the job (e.g., attractiveness), the procedure (e.g., procedural justice), and the organization (e.g., history)

Simons & Roberson (2003)

-Fairness of employees led to employee retention intentions and enhanced service

Trevino & Youngblood (1990)

-In sum, ethical decision-making behavior in organizations appears to be a complex phenomenon influenced by the interplay of individual differences, how individuals think about ethical decisions, and how organizations manage rewards and punishments”

Winkler et al. (2010)

-Causal chain analysis incorporates outcomes such as company performance, organizational training costs, and customer perceptions


-Casual chain analysis received more favorable manager reactions than single-attribute utility analysis