• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/6

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

6 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
European Bills of Rights
European bills of rights are extensive. They often contain statements of positive (as well as negative) rights: "right to work", to "adequate pay", "leisure and vacations", to "human dignity", and to "old age pensions"
*rights will require balancing by someone
Constitutional Amendment
*In Germany, the constitution (or Basic Law) is as nonamendable
*in Spain and Italy, legal scholars consider ‘‘core rights provisions’’ immune to consti¬tutional revision.
*Only new interpretations from the high courts can alter these ‘‘core’’ parts of these constitutions,
Hirschl Claim:
Israel
in 1992, in Israel, after years of opposition to an entrenched bill of rights, the politically dominant but soon to be nondominant Ashkenazi Jews changed their tune
Hirschl Claim:
Canada
In Canada, the adoption of a constitution and Charter of Rights took place in 1982, and Hirschl attributes its adoption to a per¬ception by its Anglophone, Protestant, business-oriented ‘‘estab¬lishment’’ that its political and cultural dominance was being threatened by the Quebec separatist movement
Hirschl Claim:
New Zealand
- New Zealand, long viewed as a stalwart of the British parlia¬mentary sovereignty system, made the turn to a written bill of rights in 1990. Hirschl finds the rising political threat there in what he calls ‘‘peripheral’’ groups.
In the late 1970s, the New Zealand pop¬ulation was more than 90% of European descent; by the mid¬1990s, it was fewer than 75%. By 1995, the population was 15% Maori and 11% Asian/Pacific Islander
Selection of Judges:
Problem in Japan
-J. Mark Ramseyer and Eric B. Rasmusen (2001) have demonstrated with the case of Japan that even a civil service system for judicial re¬cruitment (appointing judges by competitive exam rather than political connections) with a bureaucratic career ladder can still produce judges who toe the party line, because those judges who do so will be rewarded with promotions