• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/34

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

34 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
def pulled over and arrested for operating autow/o valid permit.LEO then frisked and discover crumpled cigarette package containing 14 vials of heroin in def pocket.
United States v. Robinson (1973)
searches that are "shocking to the conscience" require exclusion of evidence.
Rochin v. California (1952)
Cannot search auto after arrest when driver is in handcuffs.
Arizona v. gant (2009)
cannot conduct warrentless search at crime scene even if murder has occured
Flippo v. West Virginia
Does a traffic violation by itself give the LEO w/ authority to search a vehicle?
no
What is required to search a vehicle without a warrent?
Probable cause
LEO's shall not open locked footlocker in a vehicle w/o warrant
U.S. v. Chadwick
cannot randomly stop vehicles to look for evid of illigal activity
Deleware v. Prouse
Distinguishes btwn homes and automobiles.
U.S. v. Ross
A LEO may enter any vehicle already stopped for traffic violations or other legal issues, to see the vin number
New York v. Class
LE may search throughout a vehicle (and containers w.in it) where have PC to believe contraban or evid. is contained
California v. Acevedo
During ordinary traffic stop passengers may be req'd to step out of the vehicle even if have no suspicion that passengers have done anything
Maryland v. Wilson
Traffic viol. does not give LE auth. to search entire vehicle
Knowles v. Iowa
POP
Pi$$ed off Police
Citizen may waive 4th ammendmant rights and allow police to conduct a search. The state has the burden of proof that consent was:
-voluntary
-Given by someone who possesed the proper authority
LEO lied about having search warrent
Bumper v. NC
LEO is not req'd to tell person that he has a right to refuse searchor entry
U.S. v. drayton (This does not apply in AR)
Police may search an apt. based on consent of someone whom ploice reasonably believe poss. auth. to consent even if person does not posses such auth.
-Apparent authority
-Illinois v. Rodriguez
Implied consent
Airports, military bases nad customs
Exigent search
Emergency search
Exigent Circumstances searches cases
-Hot pursuit:Warden v. hayden
-possible destruction of evid.:Cupp v. Murphy
-
US customs and border patrol(CBP) suspicion factors
-Behavioral analysis
-observational techniques
-inconsistencies
-intelligence
-K9
-Incedent to seizure or arrest
US customs and border patrol(CBP) suspicion factors- behavioral analysis
nervousness, flushed face, avoiding eye contact
US customs and border patrol(CBP) suspicion factors- observational techiques
unexplained bulges in clothing
US customs and border patrol(CBP) suspicion factors- inconsitencies
discrepencies in answers to LE questions
US customs and border patrol(CBP) suspicion factors- Intel
from informants or other LEO
US customs and border patrol(CBP) suspicion factors- K9
signals provided by trained dogs sniffs
US customs and border patrol(CBP) suspicion factors- incedednt to seizure or arrest
evidence found in one suitcase can justify search of person and rest of persons stuff
Miranda rights
Miranda v. Arizona
-You have the right to remain silent
-Anything you say can/will be used against you in a court of law
-you have the right to have a lawyer present during questioning
-If you can not afford a lawyer, one will be appointed to you, free of charge
2 methods USSC use to ensure the police obey the law
Exclusionary rule and right to counsel
Exclusionary rule is what kind of law?
case law
What are exclusionary rules?
Rules that exclude evid. improperly obtained by LEO's
First time Exclusionary rule was used in a state?
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Exceptions to the exclusionary rule
Public saftey exception, Inevitable discovery and good faith