• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/10

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

10 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
  • 3rd side (hint)
Grand Strategy
the means by which a country achieves its objections within the constraints it faces
Components of Grand Strategy
Interests, threats to those interests, strategy for countering those threats, forces to implement the strategy
Fundamental interests
Interests valued for their own sake, an end in itself not a means
security, economic prosperity, humanitarian interests, political/ideological interests
Derivative interests
reflect causal beliefs connecting fundamental interests to more specific interests
-spreading democracy to reduce probability of war
-reduce sources of terrorism, -maintaining division of eurasia, -preventing war between other major -powers
preventing proliferation
access to gulf oil,
maintain an open international trading system
Magnitude and Nature of threat
Opposing capabilities/potential: power, size, difficulty of defense or deterrence, type of adversary (motives)- would they want to invade you?,
what do they want? why?- security seeking vs. greedy states
power/size/difficulty of defense or deterrence/ type of adversary: what do they want, why do they want it, would they invade you?
Threats: Basic Weapons Categories
Conventional/ nuclear/ other WMD
Strategy- Types of Broad Choices
Offense, Defense and or Deterrence/ Unilateral vs. Multilateral/ Forward deployment vs. Stationing in the US/ conventional or nuclear
Preventive war vs. deterrence/ damage limitation vs. limited war/ one is going after the adversary, one is stopping the adversary
Deterrence
convincing an adversary not to attack you, threatening to attack if they do
Unilateral vs. Multilateral
How much you rely on unilateral vs. how much you rely on allies
can be constraining to be part of an alliance- costly in terms of coordination/ can help in terms of support for own interests an those who are tied to your interests
Forward Deployment vs. US stationing
putting forces forward can be a tactic to convince the adversary that you are going to fight