• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/3

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

3 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

What are Inquiries?

- Does not make decisions

- Sole focus is finding truth and/or information


- Investigative



- Have a sense of flexibility in that they have the ability to approach issues without having the restrictions of the courts.

Air NZ v Mahon

- Mt Erebus plane crash case

- 28th November 1979


- Immediate port of call was to establish a statutory inquiry under the authority of the Civil Aviation Act


- Inquiry criticised Air NZ Management, but focussed mainly on poor visibility, as well as pilot error.


- Peter Mahon carried out inquiry and published report in 1981.


- Air NZ destroyed evidence such as pilot's diary and withheld information.


- Mahon resigned from HC, which highlighted issue that inquiries are to inquire, not to be a court.


- Classic example of unsure balance between red and green light theories



- Decisions of inquiries viewed in Air NZ case, as well as Peter v Davison that it reflects badly on the individual and seemingly becomes personal, when it is not.

Harlow and Rowling

Harlow and Rowling have argued that there is the possibility that the New Zealand system of Administrative Law is predicted to be forever amber- not green light, and not red, somewhere in the middle.