• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/63

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

63 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
  • 3rd side (hint)
Meritocracy (F)
The most talented and able reaping the highest rewards
Davis and Moore 1945 (F)
suggest that pay is related to talent, and that there is general agreement that the most important jobs are secured by the most able individuals who are paid appropriately high wages.
pay is related to talent
Consensus (F)
:(
Agreement
Tumin 1963 (F)
:(
raises questions about what is meant by functionally important’ roles within a social system
functionally important’ roles?
Saunders 1994 (F)
:)
Saunders (1994), a new right theory suggests that an individual’s class position was largely a product of their talent and hard work (meritocracy). He rejected the SAD thesis- the idea that social advantaged and disadvantages (SAD) explains a strong link between an individual social class origin and destination
meritocracy and SAD
Green and Goldthorpe 1999 (F)
:(
Suggested that Saunders’ work was both misleading and biased.
Braverman, 1974 (M)
The middle class is a transitory class that will disappear in time as society polarises into rich and poor; rulers and the rules. The middle class will either rise of fall. Most will fall into proletariat as their jobs becomes deskilled
Middle class will fall
Wright 1997 (N)
The middle class is a permanent feature of society where they can both be the exploiter and the exploited

e.g. they own small business in which they exploit their employees through low wages. However, he middle class get exploited by the government- do not receive benefits but get taxed on things which other do no t e.g. mansion tax
exploiter and the exploited
Mansion tax
a tax that has to be paid by anyone who owns or sells a house that is worth a very large amount of money
Sorenson 2000 (N)
The proletariat do not ‘sell’ their labour to the bourgeoisie anymore, they now ‘rent it out’. This means wages can change depending on the skill level of the worker and the current economic climate

e.g. in retail, wages can increase after receiving more training and moving levels. In ‘Dorothy Perkins, a sales advisor can have a standard level of training or an advanced.
sell/rent labour
Seabrook 1998 (N)
calls the proletariat the ‘new servant class’, serving middle and upper class taste and lifestyle

e.g. the working class now enjoy similar lifestyles such as going to the theatre
new servant clas
Market situation (N)
comes from the amount of money received (largely income related)
Work situation
comes from the conditions of service e.g. hours work, benefits, status of employment etc
Pakulski and Waters (1996 (P)
class is dead and it’s dead because of globalisation and the fact that we are now living in an individualised society
class is dead!
Globalisation
movement
Individualised society (P)
people no longer refer to themselves as being part of a particular social class
Tri-level class sturcutre
Upper, middle and working
Cultural reproduction
The transmission of existing cultural values and norms from generation to generation

For Marxists, this indicated cultural reproduction- where the advantaged in society could safeguard their position as the disadvantaged could not break free from oppression and exploitation
lumpen proletariat (M)
underclass
Bell 1973
we are not in a post-industrial society where knowledge and information technology is important globally
knowledge and information
Knowledge class
where what you know is more important than who you know.

This has also contributed to the blurring of class boundaries and increased social mobility.
what rather than who
Mount 2004
argues that the divide between the rich and poor has grown and suggests that the ‘Uppers’ have gained significantly while the ‘Downers’ have been left to suffer
Uppers and Downers
Uppers
Rich
Downers
Poor
Cannadine 1999
argues that the UK social classes were never culturally homogenous and that the tri-level class structure and clear class cultures are historically inaccurate
social classes are not homogenous
Homogenous
Of the same kind; alike
Pakulski and Water 1996
the concept of social class is no longer relevant in contemporary societies.
social class not relevant in contemporary societies
vast gulf
large disconnect

there's a large disconnect between the rich and poor
legitimate
make law
Scott 1991(UC)
argues that the UK still has a ruling class but it has changed and is divided into a number of fractions.

An important division is between those with large economics holdings and the directorships of multi-national companies compared to those with small economic companies or a small stake through shareholding e.g. Sir Alan Sugar and Mark Zuckerberg
still a ruling class but has changed
Miliband, 1969 (M)
the state is a tool of the ruling class, used to control ideas in society
state is a tool
Goldthorpe et al 1980 (W)
disagrees that the upper class still exists. They believe that the ‘old rich’ who gain their wealth and status from property are so insignificant in number that they should not be considered as a meaningful category in their own right.

They believe the upper class as changed and its power and status has been diluted.
Upper class are small in number
old rich
People who gain their wealth and status from property
Cultural capital (UC)
forms of knowledge, skill, education or any advantages a person has which gives them a higher status in society.
Divine (2005 (MC)
carried out 50 unstructured interviews with doctors and teachers in Manchester.

Divine suggest that they felt uneasy using the label of class, as they feared being perceived as being superior to others
don't want to label themselves as middle class
The Future Foundation (2006 (MC)
Using questionnaire asked people ‘Which social class do you belong to?’ They found that 43% said middle, 53% said working and 1% said upper.

They predicted by 2020, the UK will mainly be a middle class society.

However, they suggest that the UK is already a middle class due to factors such as:
mass wealth (more people are getting richer),
changing distribution of wealth through property ownership, changing nature of employment (growth of service sector) and social mobility.
Service sector
activities where people offer their knowledge and time to improve productivity, e.g. government, education, banking
Polarised
the process whereby a social group is divided into two opposing sub-groups
Goldthrope et, 1980 (MC)
:)
the existence of employees in the service class (higher and lower grade) and occupations such as routine managerial and white-collar jobs suggest strongly that Marxist was incorrect in his predictor that the middle class will disappear
white-collar jobs
Future Foundation, 2006
in 2005, the UK average earnings were £22,900. For those in working class, it was £20,500 and those in the middle, it was £25,5000
average earnings
Wright 1997 (N, MC)
argued that the middle class occupy a conflicting class location; tied to the bourgeoisie and the proletariat.

They are able to exercise some control over production but ultimately are not involved in key decision-making processes; they are at one the controlled and the controllers.
conflicting class location
Roberts et al 1977 (MC)
showed how the middle classes have divided into different groups.

Roberts uses the concept of fragmentation to describe the divisions within the middle class into different sections- some hold a clear image of themselves as middle class while other like routine white-collar workers define themselves as working class despise the fact that NSSEC places them in the middle ranks.
middle class are divided
Fragmentation
split identities
Savagae et al 1992 (W, MC)
differentiate between different types of middle class identities and lifestyles.

They concluded that middle class is split into public sector professionals (working health, education, welfare) and private sectors entrepreneurs (whose incomes were considerably higher than their public-sector counterparts)
public and private sector
Economic position
The primary sector- part of the economy that produces raw materials, such as crude oil, timber, grain, or cotton.

The secondary sector,- made up of mills and factories, turns the raw materials into manufactured goods, like fuel, lumber, flour, or fabric.

The tertiary sector- services rather than goods, and includes distribution of manufactured goods, food and hospitality services, banking, sales, and professional services like architects, physicians, and attorneys.
Willis (1977 (WC)
Life in traditional working-class communities are based around shared culture where jobs were based in manual and unskilled labour.

Families were based largely around traditional gender roles and children were encouraged to follow in their parents’ footstep, indicating a form of cultural reproduction.

This led to strong community based on unity, solidarity and togetherness, where a ‘them and us’ attitude existed, with worker distrusting their employer’s intentions.
solidarity
solidarity
unity, harmony
Savage et al 2005 (WC)
carried out 50 unstructured interviews with people who lived in Cheadle in Manchester.

They found a strong culture of manual labour. The area had a ‘practical flavour’ where many of the men were employed in the physical or manual jobs. Half of the men interviewed belonged to a local social club, which formed the basis of their social life and leisure activities, showing a culture of collectivism.

The women organised their social lives around local families or contacts in the areas.

However, most of the interviewees did not work locally and had to travel to work. Most were home owners, owned cars and has access to consumer goods.

This study suggests that the working class may have changed, but it has not disappeared.
Manchester- hasn't disappeared
Embourgeoisement theory
Weberian based with Goldthorpe (1968)

Embourgeoisement is the process through which the working class becomes more like the middle class by achieving relatively comfortable levels of financial security and material well-being.
Goldthorpe (1968) (embour)
The research compared findings of class position of a group of manual workers who lived and worked in Luton (1960’s) compared to the class position of a group of routine white-collar workers living in the same area.

Goldthorpe argued that if the class position of the manual workers compared favourable to that of the non-manual workers, it could be presumed that Britain had a growing middle class; with evidence of embourgeosiement taking place

The research found that the manual workers were not clones of the middle class; they had an active attitude to work where work was a means to an end rather than an end in itself and they were leading increasingly privatised lifestyles where the solidarity of the working-class past was being replaced by a culture of individualism. They shared similar work situation to the non-manual works but did not have similar market situation.

Goldthorpe concluded that the process of embourgeosiement was not occurring the UK, although there was evidence of an emerging rich worker who may be part of a changing working class.
Luton research
a means to an end
when something you are doing (work) is not as important to you as what you hope to achieve by doing it (in this case, probably money). Whoever says this does not really enjoy their job in itself, it is a job they are just doing to earn some money.
Work situaton
?
Market situation
?
Consumer conscious
purchasing products and services produced responsibly.

Responsible production can encompass a range of social and environmental factors, such as ensuring labour practices are fair or that products are produced with the aim of minimizing environmental impacts
Devine 1992 (embourg)
:(
Repeated the study in a different area of the south east and found less evidence of embourgeosiement than Goldthorpe.

The manual workers in her study were not leading privatised lives but were becoming more consumer conscious. They still displayed collectivist values and believed that society should be more equal
Repeated Goldthorpe's study
The Future Foundation 2006 (embourg)
:(
study suggests a more muddled picture with the boundaries between working and middle class being blurred
blurring boundaries
Proletarianisation theory
Marxist based with Braverman (1974)

social process whereby people move from being either an employer, unemployed or self-employed, to being employed as wage labor by an employer. In Marxist theory,

Proletarianisation is often seen as the most important form of downward social mobility.
alienated
isolated
Gaillie 1994 (prolet)
:(
'Upskilling' which appears to be a product of the information age
upskilling
Future Foundation 2006 (prolet)
:(
study predicts that by 2020, the UK will be a predominantly middle-class society both subjectively and objectively.
UK will mainly be middle class
Shop-floor culture
the part of a factory housing the machines and men directly involved in production
Surrigde, 2007
Elements of a class consciousness related to workplace attitudes and practices
class consciousness
Thiel 2007
Spent a year carrying out a participant observation study of builders on a construction site in central London.

He found masculine practices that were very similar to the ‘shop-floor culture’ observed in many earlier sociological studies of working-class life.

At work, the builders were characterised by general game-playing such as ‘having a crack’, ‘piss-taking’ and conflict with those in authority.

It was a culture that spread out from the workplace into leisure activities where talk of working hard, playing hard, drinking hard and fighting hard were dominant in the men’s conversation.

Thiel shows how class and gender cannot be separated when exploring social behavior
class and gender