• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/8

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

8 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Dipboye et al. (2012)

validity of structured interview is higher than unstructured interview validity




interviews serve multiple purposes (recruitment, convey information, show interest)




most frequently used selecttion method

Barrick et al.

(2012)stuctured interview validity = .31


unstructured interview validity=.23

Judge et al.

(2000)validity of structured interview is small after controlling for cognitive ability since they are related

Pulakos et al.

(1996)interviews play huge role in determining validity since can range from -.10 to .65

Ployhart et al.

(2006)biodata is one of the best selection devices for performance, even predicting beyond GMA and Big5

McDaniel et al.

(2007)SJTs have good predictive validity for job performance, but SJTs measure more than one construct since typically related to cog. ability and personality

Schmidt & Hunter

(1998) biodatameasures yield validities ranging from .30 to .35 when used to predict job andtraining success

Christenson et al.

(2010) video-basedSJTs (high stimulus/low response fidelity) exhibited a validity coefficient of0.47