• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/100

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

100 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

lamarck

first scientist to use biologie


believed in two major causes of species change

biologie

study of life as a distinct species

lamarcks two major causes of species change

1. natural tendency for species to progress toward a higher form


2. inheritance of acquired characteristics

example of inheritance of acquired characteristic

girafees long neck, passed down

cuvier

catastrophism

catastrophism

species are extinguished periodically by sudden catastrophes such as meterorites and then replaced by diff. species

darwins explanatory challenge

why change takes place


how new species emerge


what the functions are of parts

malthus

human capacity limikt

organisms exist in number far more_____ than they can ______

greater


survive and reproduce

struggle for existence

favoritable variations tend to be perserved and unfavorable ones die out go on to next generation, new adapations

3 essential ingredients to natural selection

variance, inhertitance, and differential reproductive sucess

variation

essential for evolution to operate, provides raw materials for evolution

inheritance

only some variations inherited


passed down from parents/offpsirng

selection

some heritable variants leave more offspring b/c those attributes help with the task of survival and reproduction

differential reproductive sucess

possesio of heritaqble variants that increase or decrease an individuals chances of surviving and reproducing **key


everyone has ancestors not everyone leaves descendants

natural selection provided 3 key answers

1. explained change over time


2.explained apparent pursoive quality of component parts


3.united all species into one grand tree descendent (including humans)

objections natural selection

no theory of inheritance (now evidence)


hard to imagine utility of intermediate stages


belief speices were unchanging



sexual selection

peacock


open invitation to predators


consequence of successful matting

intrasexual

competition between members of the same species

intersexual

competition between members of the opposite species

genetic drift

random changes in the genetic makeup of a population


mutation


founder effect


bottleneck

founder effect

small porportion of a population establishes a new colonly and the founders of the new colony are not genetically representive of orginial population

bottleneck

happen when a population shrinks, owning to a random catastrophe, earthquake

mendel

showed inheritance was particulate not blended


qualities of parents are passed on to their offspring, genes


pea plants

gene

smallest discrete unit that inherited by offspring

genotype

entire collection of genes within an individual

ethology

focus on behavior requires underlying physical structures


change has taken place overtime

imprinting

do what the first moving they observe at life


ducks (bonding between mother/new born)


pattern its behavior


critical period

lorenz

founder of ethology-mechanisms and adaptive value of animal behavior

four whys of behavior

1. immediate influneces on behavior (movement of the mother)


2. developmental influences (events during the ducks lifetime that causes changes)


3. function of behavior( keeping the baby duck close to mother, which helps it survive)


4. evolutionary or phylogentic orgins(what sequence of evolutionary events led to the orgins of an imprinting mechanism in the duck.

fixed action patterns

sterotypic behavioral sequences an animal follows after being triggered

problems with elthology movement

labels v. explanations


ignored psychology


no standards for identifying adaptation or function

who came up with inclusive fitness revolutin

william hamilition

classical fitness

the measure of an individuals direct response success in passing on genes through the production of offspring

relativeness

50% parents


25% aunts uncle, grandparents, grandchildren


12,5% cousins


6.5% 2nd cousins

parental care

investing in ones own child

inclusive fitness revolution

increase reproduction by helping brothers, sisters, newphews




sum of an indiviuals own reproductive success plus the effects of the individuals actions have on the reproductive success on his/her relatives



what would you do if you were a gene

ensure surivial of vechile (body)


reproduce, making copies of your gene


help survival and reproduction that contain copies of you



williams and adaptation

downfall of group selection





group selection

adapatation evolved for the benefit of the group through the differential survival and reproduction groups


only species that possessed characteristics to group survived

altruism

helping an individual at a cost to yourself

problems of altruism

incurring reproductive cots to onself


could evolve if recipitant of help were ones genetic relatives

williams criteria for adaptation

reliability, efficency, economy, complexity and improbable usefullness

adaptation

evolved solutions to specific problems that contribute either directly or indirectly to successful reproduction

triver

seminal therories

seminal theories

1. theory of reciprocal altruism


2. parenetal investment


3. parent-offspring conflict

reciprocal altruism

conditions under which mutally beneficial exchange relationships or transaction could evolve


(favor for a favor)

parental investment (theories)

sexual selection for each sex


high investing sex/low investing sex


selection pressures

high investing/low investing sex

female/male

parent offspring conflict

parents/children will get into conflict because they share 50% genes


what is best for kid, what is best for parent

who came up with sociobiology concept

wilson

controversy with sociobiology

cannibalize psychology


culture, religion, ethics could be explained by this

common misunderstandings about evolutionary theory

1. genetic determinism


2. intractability (can't change it)


3. current mechanisms are optimally designed- never make a mistake


4. motivation to maximize inclusive fitness- pass on genes to next generation



genetic determinism

argues behavior is controlled by genes

human behavior cannot occur without two ingredients

1. evolved adaptations


2. enviornment input that triggers the development and activism of these adaptations

how many years ago orgin of life

3.8-3.7 billion years ago

mammals orginated/ what they have

200 million years ago


warm blooded


mammary glands - nutrients


placenta (114 million years ago - more protection while in the womb

did humans evolve from apes

no

primates

85 million years ago


grasping


steroscopic vision- predators, eyes facing forward, advantage in jumping branch to branch


large brains- solve more complex problems

bidpedal locomotion

4.4 million years ago


ability to walk, stride, run on two feet, energy, greater visual angle, decrease sun exposure, freed hands

tool use

2.5 million years ago


oldowan stone tools


used by homo habillis


sharp edge

homo erectus

1.8 million years ago


migrated from africa to asia


nethanderthals

acheulean hand axe

1.5 MYA


sharp edge

homo brain

expanded


double in size

nethanderthals

europe/asia


weak chins/receding foreheads


large brain


tough living/cold climate


30,000 years ago went extinct


homo sapiens emerged

freud

sexuality was motivating force for adults and everyone


instincts

instinctual system

life perservative- food, water, shelter, surivial instincts

william james

instincts

instincts

faculty of acting such a way as to produce certain ends without forsight of ends and w/o previous education in the performance


over ridden by others


contradict each other


multiple

conclusion about instincts

more instincts in humans than in other animals

behaviorism people

skinner, watson

watson

classical conditioning



classical conditioning

type of learning where two previously unconnected events come to be associated


ringing bell>> food

skinner

operant conditioning

operant conditiong

reinforcing consequences of behavior for subsequent behavior


behavior followed by reinforcement repeated


behavior not followed by reinforcement not repeated



Margaret Mead

cultural variability

cultural variability

sex roles reversed, sexual jealously gone


peacefucl people did not compete, rape, fight or murder


FALSE

Harry Harlow

moneys, two articial mothers


1 mother mesh other with cloth


climbed on mesh mom for food, spent time with cloth ran to when scared



garcia effect

gave food then injected rats with raditiation, never ate food again


some are prepared to learn things

seligman

condition people to develop fears but hard to condition others (less natural)


mineka's monkeys


scared of snakes but not flowers

conclusion of garcia effect

external enviroment not sole determiner, must look inside heads

information processing description

input>>>decision rules>>>outputsj

brains compared to computers

general processors and has individal processors

where is inofmration housed

neurobiology of brain

language

brocas area- speech production


wernickes area- language comprehension


strokes helped to identify this

is there a general capacity to process info

no

general learners

we are not this


general info processors

problem of combinatonal explosion

impossible for general info processors


don't know how to deal with problems


fight or flight respones


too many inputs/solutions


need general processing

three theories of orgins of complex adaptive mechanisms

creationism


seeding theory


evolution by natural selection

creationism

not scientific


supreme deity created all


relgion/belief


not false/not useful

why is creationism not scientific

cannot be tested


not guided researches to any new studies


not proved useful as scientific explanation for already discovered organic mechanisms

seeding theory

life did not orginate from earth


testable



three concepts of seeding theory

seeds of life arrived on earth by meterorite


extaterrestial intelligent beings came from other plants/galaxies and planted seeds



problems with seeding theory

no solid evidience


no new discoveries


pushes explanation for life forms back in time

evolution by natural selection

explains known facts


testable/observable


leads to new predicition

bidpedal locomotion (evolution)

being able to observe predators/prey


frees up hands


increases flexability


stamina


exposes less surface area to the sun

umbilicial cord (evolution)

filter/protect


nutrients

3 products of evolutionary processes

adaptation, by products, noise

adaptation

inherited, reliably devloping, natural selection, solve problem of reproduction/survival


passing of genes


does not need to appear at birth (breasts)


contribute to reproduction/survival


mutations

mutations

copying error of dna


may help survival/reproduction


passed to next generation , keep passing be passed on to population