• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/19

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

19 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

LLOYD GEORGES MOTIVES/AIMS

Lloyd George wanted to continue trading with Germany


Wanted to maintain naval supremacy


Not too harsh


Wanted reparations


Limit territorial loses so industry not affected



CLEMENCEAUS MOTIVES/AIMS

PUNISHED HARSHLY


Lots of reparations


Limited military for safety


Blame for WAR

WILSONS MOTIVES/AIMS

Wants to make a democracy so not harsh


Blame for War


Not enough so they would seek revenge


14 points

LLOYD GEORGE SATISFIED?

WAR GUILT: yes


REPARATIONS: too much


MILITARY: yes


TERITOTIAL: no lost industry like the Saar

CLEMENCEAU SATISFIED

WAR GUILT: yes


REPARATIONS: Wants more but likes the Saar


MILITARY: safer with greater


TERRITIORIAL: wants more of Rhinelands

WILSON SATISFIED?

TOO HARSH and lack of colonial independannce which doesn't link to his 14 points

WHY DID THE VICTORS NOT GET EVERYTHING THEY WANTED?

Had to represent Public opinion


Had different Aims


Armistace


Break up of Austrio-Hungary


Secret War Treaties



TERRITORIAL LOSES

Danzig and Saar to LEAGUE


Alsace Lorraine to FRANCE


Eupen Malmedy to BELGIUM


Rhinelands DEMILITARISED


Upper Silesia and Polish Corridor to POLAND


Togoland to Britain

HOw did Germany React

Reactions to the Treaty in Germany were very negative. There were protests in the German Reichstag (Parliament) and out on the streets. It is not hard to see why Germans were outraged. Germany lost 10% of its land, all its overseas colonies, 12.5% of its population, 16% of its coal and 48% of its iron industry. There were also the humiliating terms, which made Germany accept blame for the war, limit their armed forces and pay reparations.

IMPACT ON GERMANY (Look in notes aswell)

Weimar Government


Kapp Putsch (March 1920)


Reparations


Ruhr (January 1923)


Hyperinflation

HOW DID BRITAIN REACT

Mixed reaction. The general opinion in Britain was that the terms were fair and should probably have been more severe. British newspapers suggested that Germany would no longer threaten world peace. Any complaints by the Germans were dismissed as trickery and play-acting. When Lloyd George returned from Paris in June 1919, he received a hero's welcome. The king came out to meet him at the railway station, which was completely unheard of in British history.

HOW DID FRANCE REACT

Mixed. There were celebrations that the war was definitely over. People approved of the reparations that Germany had to pay. They also liked the fact that Germany's borders with France (the Rhineland) would be demilitarised. This meant Germany could not station any troops in this area. They appreciated that the coalmines of the Saar would bring prosperity to France instead of Germany. They also believed that the League of Nations would be a powerful force for peace. It would protect France if Germany recovered and tried to act aggressively again.However, there was a strong sense that Germany still threatened France. Many French people looked at the terrible cost of the war and believed that France had suffered far more than Germany. Soon after the Treaty, Clemenceau stood for election as President of France. He was outraged when other candidates stood against him. It was then that he realised how bitter many people were about the Treaty.

HOW DID USA REACT

Negative. Many Americans felt that the Treaty was unfair on Germany. More importantly, they felt that Britain and France were making themselves rich at Germany's expense and that the USA should not be helping them to do this. This was not really the case, but many Americans believed it.This was partly because American politics were deeply divided at the time. President Wilson led the Democratic Party. However, his rivals in the Republican Party dominated the US Congress. They used the Treaty as an opportunity to criticise Wilson. Wilson has to take some of the blame for this as he made little effort to consult the Republicans about the Treaty. Americans were also uneasy about Wilson's scheme for a League of Nations. They were concerned that belonging to the League would drag the USA into international disputes that were not their concern. In the end, the Congress rejected the Treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations.

TREATY OF ST GERMAIN 1919

forbade anschluss


Austria had to disarm


Austria had to have army<30000


Land Given away


Czecholslovakia created


No longer a leading power



TREATY OF NUEILLY 1919

Signed with BUlgaria


Reparations of 100 million


Army less than 20,000


Lost access to the sea


Had to disarm


Lost land to Greece

TREATY OF SIEVRES 1920

Signed with Turkey


Lost straits to the Black Sea


Now had independant former lands


Not successful treaty


Turkish nationals challenged and drove Greeks out of Smyra

TREATY OF TRIANON 1920

Signed along with the Treaty of St GERMAIN but with Hungary


Transfer of land


Army less than 35,000 men


areas of land to Czecholslovakia.

IT WAS JUSTIFIED

They had been harsher in the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, 34% of Russia's population, 50% of its industry and made them pay 300 million gold roubles in reparations.


The reparations were only 2% GDP


No enthusiasm for Wilson's 14 points but angry when they were not given to them


France had lost over 4 million men


It would have been harsher it it weren't for Wilson and Lloyd George, Clemenceau wanted the Treaty destroyed.

IT WAS NOT JUSTIFIED

NO invited to the League


Forced to sign War Guilt - DICTAT