• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/58

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

58 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
historical linguistics
- concerned with both description and explanation of language change
- nature and reason for change
- compare relationships, est families
Natural cause of change
- no 2 ppl acquire identical grammar
- differences even less than dialectical diffs
- diffs gradually lead to lang change after many generations
- ppl who speak diff'ly acting as model for child
- lang change = built into lang acquisition
Regularity (evenly, uniformly arranged) and Systematicity of lang change
- dev. of fixed SVO word order in modern english affected all verbs, not just few
- vowel change ɑ: did not only occur for 1 word, but rep'd regular development of Old English vowel ɑ: > ɔ: > o
Causes of Lang Change (3)
1) Articulatory Simplification
2) Analogy and reanalysis
3) Language contact
Why lang change inevitable and why does it follow predictable universal patterns?
- children must acquire grammar from available data
- children draw from same physiological and cognitive endowment - same patterns consistently and repeatedly manifested in all langs
Articulatory Simplification
- most sound changes have physiological basis
- typically result in artic simplif
- ease of articulation
- ex: simplification of C clusters
- by deletion of C - fɪfs - fifths
- insertion of V - æθ ə lit
Analogy and Reanalysis
- internal/cognitive factors as basis
- role in change of the grammar
Analogy
- reflects preference for regular patterns over irreg ones
- extension of regularity on basis of inference that if elements alike in some respects, should be alike in others as well
- similarities: phonological or semantic characteristics
- Ex: phonol'cal, sting/stung, swing/swung -> bring/brung in some dialects
- Ex: in acquisition - kids generalize regular -ed past tense form to produce goed, knowed
- impt role in morphological change too
Reanalysis
Reinterp an existing structure as new meaning
- partic common w/ morphological change (folk etymologies)
- morphol: attempt to attribute compound or root+affix structure to word formerly not broken down into component morphemes
- Ex; hamburger (meat patty from Hamburg) reanalyzed as ham+burger
- new morpheme created "burger"
- reanalysis leads to back formation
Language Contact
situation where speakers of 1 lang interact freq'ly w/ speakers of other lang or dialect through sustained and massive contact
- result: borrowing, esp where many bi/multilinguals
- borrowing affects lexicon most
- can affect phonetics/phonol
- new phonemes or allophones
- German velar fric x (Bax-Bach)
- if signif borrowing, segment may be new phoneme
- MidEngl London dialect dev contrast btwn f and v through contact w/ other engl dialects and french which had v in word-initial position
- sensitive to dominance rel's (US Engl vs Native indian)
- lingua franca - requires prestige
- diff varieties of Engl acq round world
- heading towards "family of Engl language"
- Massive L2 Acquisition - cause of change - swahili lost tone as phonemic contrast
Language contact change in S Florida (even w/ monolinguals)
- pragmatic - come/go
- phonetics - less vowel reduction (cus Spanish is syllable timed)
- less aspiration
Creole (lang contact)
- (disputed) initial stages based on pidgin
- at this time dev as creole or die
- Bickerton - possible to create creole in 1 generation - Nicaraguan sign lang
- more institutional background, the quicker the formation of creole
Knowledge of lang change comes from study of ____ and _____. Change is highly systematic and regular.
Romance langs (how developed out of latin)
English (great written evidence of Old, Mid, and Modern + Latin)
Nature of/Types of Changes (4)
1) Sound
2) Morphological
3) Syntactic
4) Lexical and Semantic
Sound Change
Processes of phonetically conditioned change - usu. bring artic simplif - over time, signif phonol change
- focus on segment change and sequential segment change
Sound change Types (2)
1) Articulatory - Sequential, segmental
2) Auditory
1) Sequential Change (6)
1. Assimilation
2. Dissimilation
3. Epenthesis
4. Metathesis
5. Weakening/ Deletion
6. Consonantal Strengthening
1* Assimilation (def)
- most common type of sequential change
- increases efficacy of articulation thru simplification of artic mvmts
- partial assim over time can result in total assim
- Ex: stop assim's totally to a following stop Italian octo> otto eight
Assimilation types (3)
1. Place
2. Voicing
3. Manner -Palatalization/Affrication and Nasalization
1. Place
- Ex - nasals assimilate in place of articulation to the following consonant
- Ex: Spanish - semda-> senda (path)
- Ex: Latin - inpossibilis -> im
2. Voicing
voicing assimilation
- Ex: Old Engl - slæpde > slæpte > slɛpt - Regressive
- Ex: stefn > stmn > stem(N) - Progressive
3. Place/Manner - Palatalization/Affrication
effect that front Vs or j have on velar, alv, and dental stops, making articulation more palatal
- 1st step in changing palatalized stops to affricates
- ex: Romance langs:
- latin-italian- [k]centum>[tʃ]cento 100
- medius>mezzo[dz] half
- VL or VC depends on voicing of orig stop
4. Manner - Nasalization
nasalizing effect that nasal C can have on adjacent V
- change occurred in French and Portuguese w/ subsequent loss of nasal C
- Latin-Port: bon- > bom [bõ]
- un- > um [ũ]
2* Dissimilation
process whereby segment is made less like another segment in its envir
- musch less freq than assim
- typically occurs when diff to artic or perceive two sim sounds n close proximity
- Latin anma> alma avoiding 2 consec nasal sounds
- can affect non-adjacent seg's
- Latin arbor> Spanish arbol, Italian albero
- avoiding 2 instances of r in adjacent syllables
3* Epenthesis
insertion of C or V into particular envir
- some cases, caused by anticipation of upcoming sound
- ex: earlier Old Eng vs later Old Eng: ganra>gandra gander
- epenthetic stop [d] has place of artic of preceding nasal but agrees w/ following seg invoice and place
- transitional bridge
- break up sequence of sounds either difficult to pronounce or not permitted in language
- Ex: Spanish avoidance of word-initial [sk]
- latin [sk]schola> [esk]escuela
- [sk]scribere > [esk]escribir
4* Metathesis
change in relative positioning of segments
- can affect adjacent or nonadjacent segments
- Ex: Old Eng earlier v later form: wæps>wæsp wasp
- Ex: latin miraculum> Spanish milagro
- l and r switched places
5* Weakening and Deletion
happens to C and V
-frequency of use contributes to shortening: ev'ry vs summery
- vowel deletion preceded diachronically by vowel reduction
- typically affects short Vs in unstressed sylls and may affect all or subset of full Vs
- Ex: Old, Middle, Modern: stanas[a] > stones[ə] > stones ∅
- Ex: MidEng, Modern, initial [kn] lost, [k] deleted
- consonants particularly subject to weakening in intervocalic envirs
Pathway of C weakening
VL stop>VL fric or VC stop> VC fric > Nasals > Liq > Glides
- geminate C's stronger
tt> t> θ or d > ð > ∅
- Ex: Romance: Latin-Spanish: mittere>meter (to put)
Latin-Old Spanish maturus>maduro
Old Spanish-Spanish
maduro>maðuro
Old French>French
[maðyr]>mûr
6* Consonantal Strengthening
glide strengthening to affricate is particularly common, esp in word-initial position
- Ex: Latin-Italian: [j]iuvenis> [dʒ]giovane (young)
1)cont. Segmental Change (not necess. caused by envir)
complex segments (affricates) commonly subject to simplification (deaffrication to fricative)
- Deaffrication in French means early borrowing into Engl maintain affricates, later borrowing shows fricative
- Old French: [tʃ]chaiere> chair [tʃ]
- Mod French: [ʃ]chandelier> [ʃ]chandelier
2) Auditorily Based Change
substitution - type of auditorily based change involving replacement of segment with another similar-sounding segment
- f replacing x or θ
- mid english-english: laugh[x]>laugh[f]
-english-Cockney:thin[θ]>[fin]
All sound changes lead either to phonetic or phonological change
phonetic = new allophone
leads to phonol= splits, mergers, shifts
Phonol Split
allophones come to contrast due to loss of conditioning environ.
- creation on ŋ phoneme
- /sɪng/ = [sɪŋg] >
- deletion of [g] > [sɪŋ] > /sɪŋ/
Phonol merger
2 or more phonemes collapse into a single one
-auditorily based substitution ex of Cockney
- /θ/ and /f/ -> /f/ thin and fin=/fɪn/
- /ð/ and /v/ -> /v/ smooth=/smuv/
Phonol shift
change in which series of phonemes systematically modified so organization w/ respect to one another altered
-Great English Vowel shift (mid to Modern) - modification to long vowels
- high Vs -> DTs (xclude ɪ/ʊ)
- others moved up (e:&ɛ:>i:)
Causes of phonol shifts?
possibly explained by TENDENCY for langs to maximize use of space in oral cavity
- langs w/ 7+ Vs often undergo diphthongization - reaction to overcrowding of phonol space - doesnt infringe on simple V space
Morphological Change (Affix)
1) Affix addition (borrowing)
-French -ment into MidEng as whole units, eventually used w bases not French in origin (acknowledgment, merriment)
2) Affix loss
- loss of OldEng case + gender affixes thru sound change (C & V deletion) - 5 markers to 1 ('s)
- [m] deleted from dative plural
- V's reduced>deleted in unstressed affixes
- AS RESULT, case+gender distinctions obliterated
Morphological Change in general
analytic - few inflec affixes
synthetic - many inflec affixes
- sound change and affix add/loss ensures endless morphological transitions
- English: once synthetic->more analytic
Morphology (Analogy)
-sound change effect on morphology often alleviated by analogy
- hands is result of earlier analogy with MidEngl hund (hound) which formed plural with -s (-as OldEng)
- if only sound change, would be handa>handə>hand
- continuing analogy - youse; some dialects
- temporary extension by kids - sheeps, gooses, mouses
-
Morphology (Reanalysis)
- can result in new morphological structure for a word for both native and borrowed words
- woodchuck - Algonquian borrowing unrelated to wood or chuck
- affixes - OldEng complex suffix -lic + e reanalyzed as as adverbial suffix
- then used by analogy to derive adverbs from adjective in forms it was not used before - ModEngl deeply
- can result in new productive patterns (as for (-)burger)
Syntactic Change
- can involve modifications to phrase structure and transformations
Word Order
- all langs make S/DO distinction
- case marking or Word Order
- As OldEnglish lost case marking, word order became less variable, more set
- during MidEngl period, fixed SVO order became way to mark grammatical relations
- in terms of most basic structure, engl changed from SOV in Early Germanic to SVO in ModEng
- OldENg represents transitional syntactic type
- evidence: OV compound man+strike = manslaughter
Inversion
- in Old and MidEng yes-no question inversion rule applied to all verbs not just auxiliaries
- Speak they* > Can they speak?
Lexical Change
- modification to lexicon (focus on entire words)
- addition, loss
Addition of Lexical Items
through word formation processes or borrowing
- innovation and cultural contact can lead to lexical gaps
- Word formation processes: compounding and derivation (N:verb+er) (Adj: N+ful)
- always been available to English speakers
- still, conversion, not avail to OldEng
Addition of Lexical Items (Borrowing)
depending on cultural relationship, langs can have 3 types of influence:
1. substratum - infl of politically or culturally nondominant lang
-borrowing usu restricted to place names or unfamiliar items
-Celtic substratum- Thames, London
2. superstratum - effect of dominant lang
-Norman French infl on English related to Norman conquest in 1066
-word rel'd to political, cultural, judicial notions borrowed (tax, art, judge)
- desire to speak like social superiors
3. adstratum - neither one pol. or cult. dom
- starting in 800, Scandinavians settled part of England
-borrowing of common, everyday words (cake,egg,husband)

* tendency: highly frequent words are relatively resistant to loss or substitution through borrowing
Loss of Lexical Items
Often lost through cultural change, as notions/objects become obsolete, words fall into disuse
-OldEng - flytme - a blood-letting instrument
Semantic change
-typically, changes are step-by-step
1) Broadening - meaning of word becomes more general or inclusive
-bird - "small fowl">"any winged creature"
2) Narrowing - meaning becomes less general or inclusive
-hound - "any dog">"hunting breed"
3) Amelioration/Pejoration - meaning becomes more positive/negative
-Amel- pretty- "tricky, sly">"attractive
-Pej- wench- "girl">wanton woman, prostitute
4) Weakening/strengthening - change in intensity/force
-weakening more common bc we're more prone to exaggeration v understatement
-Weak- quell-kill,murder>pacify
-Strength- appalled- feeble,pale>deeply dismayed
5) Shift- word loses former meaning and takes on new, often related meaning
- immoral-not customary>unethical
-sometimes series of shifts result in meaning completely unrelated to original meaning
-gay: happy>homosexual>bad
6) Metaphor - word w/ concrete meaning takes on new abstract meaning though orig meaning not lost
-grasp>understand
Spread of Change (2 types)
how do linguistic innovations spread?
1. Diffusion thru the language
2. Spread thru population
diffusion thru lang
1)lexical diffusion - change manifest self in few words then gradually spreads thru vocabulary
- Ex: ongoing change in stress pattern in words which can be used as verbs or nouns - stress of noun form changing to first syllable - rebel, outlaw, record
v re'port v 'address/a'dress
2) Sound change - not gradual - typically affect all instances of segment
-some dialects of spanish- consonantal weakening of s to h in syl-final position - feli[h]mente
- change is entirely regular, applies w/o exception
spread thru population
- particular innovation must be accepted by ling community as whole
- often appear in speech of small group of ppl and is spread or limited by social pressures pushing for imitation of prestigious variety
- loss of post-vocalic r in east coast +south originated in certain parts of England
-Penn + midland states - most prestigious group Quakers retained post-valic r
- r-less pronunciation now stigmatized in some areas
Discovery of Indo-European
late 18th Cent
Sir William Jones, British judge discovered that Sanskrit (ancient lang of India) rel. to Latin, Greek, Germanic, Celtic in verb roots and gramm'l forms
-led to decades of historical-comparative work and major advances in 19th C
-by studying phonetic correspondence saw that most langs of:
Europe,
Persia,
northern India
belong to single family
-reconstructed grammar of protolanguage from which these langs evolved Proto-Indo-European
Rasmus Rask
early 19th cent
Danish linguist
-documented rel's among cognates and est'd methods, w/o access to Sanskrit
Franz Bopp
German scholar
-1st comparative linguistic analysis of Sanskrit, Greek, Persian, Germanic
Jacob Grimm
- early 19th C
- German
- extended Rask's work
- 1st person to explain relationships among cognates in terms of SOUND shift
Grimm's Law
phonological shift (systematic change of series of phonemes)
- consonant shifts between Proto-Indo-European and Proto-Germanic
- VL stops became frics
- VD stops became VL
- asp VC stops> VD stops
English words borrowed from Latin/French later on maintained Proto-Ind-Eur Cs
- Latin ped> pedestrian instead of fedestrian
Lang Change and naturalness
some changes more natural than others
-suggested by sim of changes across langs and directionality of change
- IF naturalness is factor in change - manifestations should be found in lang acq and lang universals
- Universal: all langs have CV sylls and variety of sound changes reduce less nat'l syll types to more natural CV
- C deletion - [kn]V cluster>[n]V
- V epenthesis - Italian-Sicilian croce>kiruci cross
Also, CV one of first syll types to be acquired
BUT some sound changes do produce less natural sylls YET probably satisfy diff parameter of naturalness (like preference for shorter phonological forms)
- can be conflicting naturalness factors
processes of change also seen _______ vs _______ in children
-synchronically (@ particular moment) - children babbling CV
-diachronically (over per. of time) deletion of C, epenthesis of V toward CV