• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/52

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

52 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
How did culture change accelerate, 20th
-Globalization. More cultures influence each other. Connection in econ, tourism, comms (internet, phones)
-Urbanization and the move to cities
-Movements spring up with missionary qualities (commies, nationalists)
New value systems, patterns of belief in 20th
-Communism
-Nationalism
-COnsumerism
Communism as pattern of belief/culture
-Equality is an acheivable goal
-Common economic form
-History is on your side
-Science kicks ass
-POINT: Conversion to communism is more than politics/econ. It is a culture
Nationalism as pattern of belief
-Could provide people with a culture system. National identity, hope in the progress of your nation
Consumerism as pattern of belief
-Consumerist values, with other stuff attached..Cons +
-Like stuff you don't need, is a measure of success
-Cosmopolitan, tolerance, science
What do 20th value systems have in common/different
-Not just elitist, but apply to all
-They are all secular systems.
-Belief in progress.

-Some are intolerable of each other. Commies don't like nationalism or consumerism.
20th value systems today?
-World communism has died
-Strong in US and some in Europe, LA, but not everywhere
-Consumerism has become pervasive (US, Japan, Europe, Aust), but not universal
Why didn't religion die, 20th
-Value sys did not kill religion
-India, Middle East, US, LA, Africa
-Stayed around because of shared identity, and values
-Important sources for political support
-Provide meaning and values that consumerism does not provide
-With fall of commies, you turn to religion
Results of culture clash in the 20th
-Conflict. Lots between consumerism values and religion
-Argue aboput sexual norms, birth control, gay rights
-Middle East, to wear a veil or not
-Basically, everyone is is some form of culture conflict
Dominant themes of contemporary period
-Chagning global power balance
-Nature impact of global pop explosion
-Xformation of global tech
-Changes in political/social organization
Changing global power balance, contemp
-Decline of Western Europe and US, and East Asia has risen
-Military technology increases and global wars. Nuclear technology
Global pop explosion, contemp
-Has affected environment and resources
Global tech, contemp
-Transportation, internet, computers. Globalization itself
Political, social changes contemp
-Agriculutral systems becoming replaced more and more
-Most of the world is not monarchies. Formal empires are gone. USSR is gone. Been replaced by democracy, junta, authoritarian
-Landlords had everything before, now businessmen. Everyone is urban class workers. Patriarchy is fading. Religion is fading as a cultural stamp
Decline of the West in cintemp
-Begins at WWI, GDepress, and WWII
-Imperialism and colonialism is gone. Lost ability to impose politics on world
-Loss of life in World Wars
-Russia/Japan had crucial militaries. Now China
-Guerella warfare. Vietnam
-THE AGE OF EASY MILITARY DOMINANCE HAS ENDED
Decline of West, culture contemp
-West is not the only influencer of global culture.
-But, still pretty substantial (music, clothing)
DOW, economic contemp
-Still a core and still peripheries.
-US, EU, Japan is core
-Perip: pockets of LA, Africa,
-Many are in the middle (China, Turkey, Mexico)
COnetmp, how did people get out of periph
-Unique products (oil, rubber, natural resources). China sells fruits and veggies
-Import subsitution. Many start making their own shit instead of importing
-Mass production of goods that can be sold to the core. India has world services. Brazil has steel
Common causes/characteristics of revolution
-Peasant distress. All are peasant revolts. They want land, and the upper classes have taken it unjustly.
-Need a relatively weak government. COme when leader is young/weak
-Leadership and organization
-Ideology. Dominant one was MArxism. Everyone gets according to means, no private property, eventualy states will fade and utopian society. Mexico=democrat. Iran=fundamentalist
Key differences from Indian and African nationalism
-Indians had years of unified country and leaders that could claim legitamacy. Pride in religion, and great economy
-Afirca needed to juggle Africanness and own country. Cultural divides, no common history as united people. Arbitrary line drawing through places
Key differences between revolutiona nd nationalism
-Revolutionaries want to explode the traditional cultural values and social structures. Nationalists don’t say this.
-Revolutionaries really institute sweeping social change, but India still has hidden, caste system.
-Both are crucial to political and social change, but revolutions go much, much farther.
-Revn. more sweeping of gender relations, unlike many nationalist movements.
When does globalization begin
-Different regions pull in at different points in time. Japan, 1865. Europe, much earlier, 16th century
Arguments for newness of globalization
-Tech: Radio, jets, satelite, computers make things possible that were inconceivable before. Impossible!
-Policies: UN, world bank, NATO. Economic cooperation and increasing trade to brand new levels
Multi-national corps in globalization
-Go wherever cheap labor. Prduction branches all over the place.
-Manner ofeconomic specialization has changed
-Corps are even stronger than some governments in the places they are in
Extent of global culture
-Fast food
-Music
-Clothing
-International sports
-Spread of English Language. More chinese learning speakers than native speakers
Do most people accept globalization
Many hate the shit: 1. Culture, 2. Economic, 3. Everything else
-Only ones who like it are young women
-Young people for, old against
-Only Coastal US, Europe, Youth in Japan, Coastal china have accepted it
Why do people hate globalization
-Culture loss.The importation of one is making traditional culture go away.
-But it is good for cultural exchange. Fucking rules
How have people balanced globalization and the local
-Japanese. Fusion of art styles and send animation, film back to the West
-Bollywood
-Muslims exchanging cards for Ramadan
-Syncretism and combination is how people balance it
Why did democracy not do well in 20's and 30s
-Could not fare from economic depression
-Many socities faced shitloads of social problems. Divisions within democracy, leading to fascism and authoritarian governments
Biggest gains for demo in 40s and 50s
-Defeat of fascism. Democracies share in the victory
-Instead of pulling apart, people to start working together
-
Why did democracy not succeed in newly indep. nations, 40s 50s
-Soviets take over East Europe
-New Nation theory. In AFrica, lack of experience, bad economies, civil wars
-India somehow maintained one, almost everyone else went through an authoritarian period
Why have democracies done so well recently
-Identified with economic and political success
-As societies became more urban, had to appealfor popular loyalty or had nothing
Who is not democracy in modern era
-China. Has free market economy, but authoritarian
-Much of the middle east
-Vietnam, North Korea.
-Some have not liked it because they are opposed to WEstern ideals and values
Will demo gain ground?

Yes.No
-More stresses for democracy by UN and NGO's, amnesty
-Demo will spread with technology and computers. People want to be political equals
-Global depression could fuck it. Russia is retreating. Venez is retreating
Only two socieites that industrialize without the west
-Japan and Russia. Both preceded it with reform era.
-Russia abolishes serfdom, because not economical efficient anymore. Idealism from the WEst, Need flexible workforce. Military tech.
-Japan abolishes feudalism. opens up trade. COmmittance to universal education. MIlitary reforms. Public health reforms
How did Russia and Japan do it without the west
-Already had reasonably strong governments
-Also kind of lucky. Russia had resources.
-KEY: Both had independent economies before, and both had tradition of copying someone without becoming them (Russia and west, Japan and CHina)
Why didn't CHina industrialize like Japan and Russia
-No history of imitation and very hestitant about it
-Weak government at time of domination
-West wanted into China because of their resources. Japan and Russia, not really
LAte comer industrializers adv/dis adv
ADV: No trial and error, you can get the best shit. Might be able to avoid social costs
DIS: Best equipment is expensive. Harder to raise capital. Need to limit westerners coming in and taking over everything. Russia didn't do this, but Japan did
How did Russia and Japan overcome late comer disadv
-Tax the shit out of people
-Borrow from the WEst, but not too much
-Try cheap unique materials. Russia uses metals and oil. Japan tries to take over silk
-Governments have to exercise crucial tax controls, regulation
Why no revolution in Japan like in RUssia
-Culture of COnfucianism. Do your part, contribute to society. But don't overdo it.
-Russia had more contact with Western philosophy, subversive ideas. Japan did not.
-KEY: Japanese reforms before industrialization went farther. Japan fundamentally changed their government, Russia did not (stayed czarist, w/traditional social struc)
Why does World War I end the modern period
-West destroys themselves, massive death tolls
-Empires fall apart (Austro, Russia, Ottomans)
-Russian revolution direct result of WWI
-Political changes make it clear that some types of govt's regimes will not work in modern world (CHina)
-Encourages nationalism in new places outside of the West (Japan, India, Africa).
-West no longer dominates everything
When did US enter world arena
-Industrial revolution started it. Impact in 1860's
-80s and 90s start to reach for colonies
-In 60's we became significant arms dealers, traders, export grains/meat to Europe. Here on gotta pay attention
American exceptionalism
-US was formed with a lot of European influence, and some serious Afro/Native influences, sometime after became its own civilization. Not only was it separate, but also better. Separate maybe, better=nonsense.
Any previous theories fit the WEst
-By 1890s moving towards core, but also borrows a lot from Western Europe
-US relatively early to industrialize. Rise of science. Modernization theory fits in moderately
Ways to argue that the US is a seperate civilization
-DO not have significant socialist movement (shows why we don't understand them/so against them)
-Über religious. Early in separation of church and state, but high geographic mobility meant religion was how you had community ties
-Bad aspects: violence, legacy of slavery, pollution
Ways to argue that the US is just part of the west
-High culture is mostly European. DOn't have significant American art till 20th
-Most political ideas came from Europe
-Basic Xsition to modern birth rates
-Secual revolution in 60s. Same patterns and causes
Convergence/Divergence with Euro
-We are divergent. Europe is not religious. No birth control taboos.
-US loves death penalty
-US has crucial military establishment
In the past 100 years, what has the US done more than others
-pushed consumersim more than others. Lots of public debt
-SOme would argue more concerned with preventing classical imperialism
-We send in forces and intervene if we want
-Basically behaving the same way West Europe did
Global Trends for women
-Universal suffrage, voting rights. Almost everywhere, women can vote
-Some legal reforms/property.
-All women can receive good education
-Birth rates have gone down. Women aren't forced to have as many kids (Demographic transition)
Why change in trends for women
-Industrialization caused not as many kids to be had. Women are more educated. Economic decision
-Ideology: New systems (demo/comm) stress equality of sexes. UN and Amnesty Intl.
Problems with saying patriarchy is gone
-Regional/local places are still resistant to change (Middle East, Africa-poverty)
-Gap between what they say and what they do
-Gaps in access to birth control
-Push back by males in retaliation to women gaining ground
-Not all women want the same thing (Islam, Hindu, African). Stress on community over individual. Traditions
Three ways to use history to predict the future
-Produce analogies with current events (Iraq, Afghanistan they are using it now)
-Try to identify trends now and project them into the future using history as backbone
-Argue future will be shaped by unexpected event with no historical precedent (Nuclear war)