Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
70 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Psychophysics |
the scientific study of the relationship between the physical events and the sensations to which they give rise |
|
absolute threshold |
minimum detectable level of a sound in the absence of any other external sounds |
|
difference threshold |
the smallest difference between two tones (frequencies or intensities) that you can discriminate against. |
|
two ways to measure threshold |
close entrance to ear canal or inside of the ear (headphones and inserts)
soundfield |
|
when two ears vs one ear are used... |
thresholds are about 2-3 dB lower
|
|
threshold vary with... |
two ears vs one ear "normal" hearing can vary as much as 20 dB +/- 0 dB SPL frequency age stimulus duration ( tones under 200 ms) |
|
detection vs discrimination |
Absolute sensitivity: tone detection, method of constant stimuli Differential sensitivity: discrimination between two things (frequency, intensity, etc), adaptive method |
|
Weber's law |
change between two stimuli that's just noticeable is proportional to the magnitude of the original stimulus (res of perception diminishes with stimulus of greater magnitude - 90 to 95 probs won't distinguish, 10 to 15 probs will!)
|
|
Weber fraction |
change in intensity to detect change / original stimulus intensity = K
It's a constant and independent of original intensity |
|
stimulus features for discrimination? |
frequency, intensity, location, duration, pulsed vs continuous, ITD vs ILD, voice frequency |
|
Signal Detection Theory |
way to analyze decision making in the presence of uncertainty; separates factors related to uncertainty from factors related directly to sensory abilities (accounts for the fact that responses may vary from trial to trial even with the same stimulus) |
|
Signal Detection Theory Response options |
signal - yes --> hit signal - no --> miss no signal - yes --> false alarm no signal - no --> correct rejection |
|
sensitivity - % correct formula |
% correct = (% hits + % correct responses) / 2 |
|
true or false: Hearing impaired ears have narrow auditory filters |
false |
|
bandwidth |
the frequency range of the auditory stimuli |
|
where does masking occur in the auditory system? |
energetic - peripheral auditory system informational - CANS |
|
what makes one noise more disruptive than another? |
the more similar the masker and the target, the more difficult it is to separate them |
|
why do HoH people have difficulty understanding speech in noise? |
ex: broader auditory filters
|
|
what can be done to reduce interference by noise? |
spatial separation of sources, visual cues, knowledge of the topic being discussed |
|
describe the critical band |
the critical band is the filter in which the target signal sits. anything outside of the critical band will not affect or will help our ability to hear the tone |
|
what two types of experiments are used to measure auditory filters? |
Psychophysical tuning curves and the notched noise method |
|
psychophysical tuning curve |
-threshold for fixed-frequency signal (at low level) - masker frequency is varied - measure level of noise needed to just detect the tone (basically we present the target at a fixed level. frequency and intensity of the masker are varied. we vary these until we can see the threshold of the masking target) |
|
notched noise method |
- detect a tone in notched-noise - vary the width of the "notch" |
|
explain the shape of a psychophysical tuning curve |
the curve shows the minimum the masker has to be to detect the target. Therefore, the shape is a valley. The closer in frequency the masker and target are, the less intense the masker needs to be to detect the target. |
|
masking |
degraded perception of a target stimulus due to the presence of irrelevant interfering speech and/or noise. |
|
energetic masking |
peripheral AS. when there is overlap in neural excitation between the target and interfering signals (both spectrally and temporally). failure of frequency analysis at the level of the cochlea |
|
informational masking |
derives in the CANS. characterized by confusability of stimuli. perceptual interference resulting from masker uncertainty or novelty |
|
Fletcher's Bandlimiting Experiment |
Trying to find the critical band. Started with no noise and increased the masker. The thresholds increased until the noise bandwidth exceeded the filter bandwidth --> CB! |
|
Swamp |
when the masker produces a significant amount of activity in the auditory filter of the target, the activity created by the target may be undetectable. Neuronal firing of the target occurs but masking is swamping it out --> "activity" occurs, but we can't detect it |
|
Suppressing the target |
masker suppresses the activity that the signal would evoke if presented alone. "activity" reduced for the target because it is occurring for the masker as well. |
|
What did Brungart, 2001 show? |
At 0 SNR, as the target and masker became more similar (different sex-->same sex-->same talker), % correct went down |
|
Spatial Release from Masking |
-improvement of speech intelligibility when the target is spatially separated or perceived to be separated from the interferer. Reduction in masking through spatial separation. |
|
how do NH and BiCI children react when the target and interferers are same-sex takers? |
SRM increases suggesting that spatial cues are more useful when spectral differences are limited |
|
spatially separating X is more helpful than separating Y because Z |
X = same sex Y = different sex Z = lac spectral difference means more benefit from spatial separation |
|
true or false: Executive function does not account for variability in SRM over other factors like age, expressive vocab, etc |
true |
|
name some objective and subjective aspects of loudness and pitch |
objective: intensity, amplitude, frequency subjective: loudness, pitch, timbre |
|
How do we measure loudness? |
Magnitude estimation - present listener with reference sound and have her adjust intensity of comparison sound until the perceived loudness matches (rating on an arbitrary scale) Magnitude production - listener adjusts level of sound until it reaches some absolute, or until it reaches a relative of the standard (ex: twice as loud) |
|
Helmholz theory of pitch |
Place Code theory - stimulus is analyzed by the ear, different frequencies excite different places on the BM and different AN fibers (tonotopic org of the AS), pitch is related to the pattern of excitation produced by the stimulus |
|
temporal theory of pitch |
pitch is related to the temporal pattern of neural impulses evoked by a stimulus |
|
pitch of the missing fundamental |
we can determine the pitch of a complex tone by listening only to the fundamental, even if it's not actually in the signal |
|
how can you measure loudness using a 2-AFC task? |
AFC = Alternative Force Choice. Play 2 tones and ask which is softer or louder |
|
temporal auditory processing |
rate at which auditory info is process/analyzed. perception of sound within a restricted time domain |
|
describe test of temporal ordering |
Ordering = processing stimuli in order of appearance. Frequency and duration. participant is asked to describe the tones in terms of pitch and length (high high low, long short long, etc) |
|
test of temporal resolution |
we're testing smallest interval between two tones to have them be perceived as separate. Gap Detection Test. |
|
stream |
when sounds are grouped together and distinct from other simultaneously occurring sequences |
|
which groups often have deficits in temporal processing? |
older listeners and CAPD individuals |
|
if we have a 4000 Hz signal, what is the ITD? |
0.25 ms |
|
what is the average max ITD for an adult? |
0.6 to 0.7 ms |
|
auditory object |
fundamental perceptual unit of hearing. putting meaning to a sound. processing and formation of them occurs in the cortex. |
|
objects and streams |
ex: a person walking. Each sound is an object, but over time it groups into a stream. |
|
name things that help us segregate streams |
intensity, timing, attention, common fate, belongingness, similarity, duration, novelty, location, visual cues, timbre, prior knowledge, patterns over time, noise or in quiet, frequency |
|
binaural loudness summation |
sound heard with both ears is perceived as louder than the same sound heard with one ear |
|
binaural squelch |
improvement resulting from adding input from ear with poorer SNR |
|
Duplex theory |
ITD and ILD are processed by different mechanisms in the brain. ITD --> MSO. ILD --> LSO |
|
Binaural release from masking |
better able to hear a signal in noise with 2 ears as long as the signal and noise are coming from different directions (this is a central phenomenon while head shadow is a monaural/peripheral thing) |
|
Binaural masking level difference |
S[0] - signal presented binaurally, no interaural difference N[0] - masker "" S[pi] = signal 180 degrees out of phase with other ear N[pi] = masker "" |
|
Precedence Effect |
ability of the auditory system to make use of timing differences between the ears to suppress sounds that follow shortly after a direct sound source is emitted (localization info in the source gets precedence over reflections) |
|
fusion and build-up |
if the lead and the lag are close enough they fuse. if not, they don't fuse (echo threshold is when two sounds are heard) BUT over time the AS will suppress the lag (Build-up effect) |
|
binaural adaptation |
we become insensitive to binaural cues that are continuously repeated |
|
jeffress model |
1. temporally-coded input signals consisting of spikes that are time-locked to the waveform of the acoustic stimulus,
IOW: Coincidence detection in the MSO. From each side axons (delay lines) meet. Depending on where they meet on the coincidence detector cells, we can localize a sound |
|
Knudsen |
barn owls had prisms put over their eyes. the auditory system eventually changed to match the modified visual signal. |
|
King et al |
ferrets --> juveniles with one plugged ear localized pretty well. initially, a plugged adult doesn't do well; they adapt eventually. |
|
Sharma et al |
P1 - evoked response higher in the cortex (corresponds to speech perception). Associated with central maturation of the auditory system. The shorter the latency (the earlier CI was implanted), the more mature the auditory system. Basically, the earlier the implantation, the more normal the responses. the early implanted tend to be pretty normal while the late kids plateau |
|
auditory pathway parts |
outer ear/middle ear/cochlea/auditory nerve/CN (DCN/VCN [AVCN/PVCN])/MNTB/SOC (LSO/MSO)/Lateral Lemniscus/Inferior colliculus/medial geniculate nucleus/auditory cortex |
|
CN |
First site of parallel processing. DCN - spectral information VCN - timing |
|
MNTB |
Medial Nucleus of the trapezoid body. Relay station from CN to contralateral LSO - codes inhibitory information |
|
outer ear functions |
protect, amplify, localize |
|
middle ear functions |
protect, impedance matching |
|
inner ear functions |
filtering, transduction |
|
OHC does three things...? |
Amplify IHC response by moving the BM, compress - increase the range of sounds that are heard, and sharpen the IHC response |