• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/67

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

67 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
autocracy
rule with unlimited power
democracy
pople rule and have supreme power
oligarchy
form of gvt in which the power is in the hands of a few people or small group who have the combined power of a dictator
representative monarchy
king or queen restricted by a constitutuion of legislative body
despotism
rule with support of controlling party rule with army or secret army to suppress dissent
authoritarian socilism
gvt controls and owns all economic planning and productuion (communism) no rights for people
democratic socialism
gvt controls means of production and partial control over economic planning people retain basic human rights
dictatorship
rule by a single leader who has not been elected and may use force to control in a military dictatorship the army is in control usually there is little or no attention to public opinion or individual rights
feudalism
local gvt based on granting of land in return for loyalty military assistance and other services
fascism
dictator rule with totalitarian regime rigid control of people through force and censorship
fundamentalism
based on literal forceful and uncompromising interpretations of relitious dogma (have power of god)
direct democracy
gvt in which all citizens have equal power in decision making everyone has a say in all matters of gvt (local state and fed levels)
representative democracy
elected officials govern the state at all levels
dictatorship
advantages: people may be united in their loyalty to a dictator since there is no competition for trust and affection, in an emergency a dictator can move quickly to take action no time is lost in debate or discussion
disadvantages: people are afforded little or no individual liberty civil rights are trampled on
dictatorship
d: a dictators policies suit his her own needs needs of the people may by neglected
disadvantage dictatorship
decision making has a narrow base and can be flawed wrong dangerous and not fully supported by the people
dictatorship
ex north korea cuba iraq
oligarchy advantage
decisions can be made relatively quickly
oligarchy advantage
may provide expert leadership while avoiding the danger of one person rule
oligarchy advantage
in theiroy they are the most educated members of society
oligarchy advantage
members of the oligarchy listen to each other they work together to rule
oligarchy disadvantage
same as dictatorship needs and wants of people are not decessarily considered
oligarchy
ex: ussr
direct democracy advantage
every citizen has equal power in matters of gvt every citizen is involved in the decision making
direct democracy advantage
since all citizens are involved in decision making there is a broad base of support and loyalty
direct democracy advantage
individual liberties are protected
direct democracy disadvantage
only works when a small number of people are involved ability to gather all citizens in one place as necessary
direct democracy disadvantage
decision making involving all citizens is time consuming
direct democracy
ex switzerland and ancient greece
representatibe democracy requblic
gvt in which people elect representatives who hold the decision making power. the representatives form more than what it used to be when it was an independent ruling body for an election period charged with the responsibility of acting in the peoples interest but not as their proxy representatives that is not always necessarily according to their wishes but with enough authority to exercise swift and resolute initiative in the face of changing circumstances
representative dem. advantage
citizens are involved in decision making through their representatives lobbying and voting
rep dem advantage
representatives are aware their job depends on meeting the needs of their constituents
rep dem advantage
more likely that all elements of the population are represented
rep dem advantage
generally reps are educated and more capable citiznes who can devote time needed to solve complex problems
rep dem disadvantage
decision making is time consuming desire of representatives to please everyone may cripple system
rep dem disadvantage
representatives may not always agree with those they represent
rep dem disadvantage
lack of involved citizenry may allow special interest groups to influence or dominate representatives
rep dem
ex us
parliamentary democracy
branched from rep democracy jointing of powers, members of executive are also members of legislative, gvt and head of gvt elected by parliament responsible to parliament and can be voted out of office by it, political parties enjoy strong position oppositon forms the most important control
presidential democracy
branched from rep dem, separation of powers, clear separation between executive and legislative, gvt and parliament are dependent of each other, political parties have less of a role no party discipline
constitutional monarchy parliamentary
a form of national gvt in which the power of the monarch king or queen is restrained by a parliament by law or by custom
constitutional monarchy parliamentary advantage
decisions can be made relatively quickly
constitutional mon parliament advantage
from ruler to ruler you have a good idea of what to expect
constitutional mon parliament advantage
parliament is there to protect you from the monarchy
constitutional mon parliament disadvantage
no new change from ruler to ruler
constitutional mon parliament disadvantage
not always the most qualified getting the job
constitutional monarchy parliamentary
ex great britain sweden spain
absolute monarchy
rule by one person a monarch usually a king or queen whose actions are restricted neither by written law nor by custom a system different from a constitutuional monarchy and from a republic
absolute monarchy advantage
decisions can be made relatively quickly
absolute monarchy advantage
from ruler to ruler you have a good idea of what to expect
absolute monarchy disadvantage
no one to protect you from the rulers desires or problems
absolute monarchy disadvantage
no new blood in power unless the family line is broken
absolute monarchy disadvantage
not always worried about individuals rights
absolute monarchy
ex france until 1789, russia until 1917 and swaziland
theocracy
a form of gvt in which the clergy religious officials exercise or bestow all legitimate political authority and in which religious law is dominate over civil law and enforced by state agencies
theocracy advantage
corruption is kept at a low political leaders rule from a higher power
theocracy advantage
officials know the people well because they are the church officials and know the people at a personal level
theocracy disadvantage
corruption can be a problem because they say they answer to a higher power but how do you know
theocracy disadvantage
no separation of church and state if you dont believe in that religion then you are thrown to the back burner
theocracy
ex iran islam
anarchy
is a situation where there is no gvtl this can happen after a civil war in a country when a gvt has been destroyed a rival groups are fighting to take its place. anarchists are people who believe that gvt is a bad thing
anarchy advantages
no gvt telling you what to do
anarchy advantage
people are free to do what they deem is right
anarchy disadvantage
no gvt to protect you
anarchy disadvantage
no ones looking out for you best interest it is you against the world
anarchy disadvantage
things the gvt provided you with will no longer be there
anarchy
ex iraq afghanistan