Foundations Slice 3 Examn

Front 1

3 solutions to the epistemological barrier

Back 1

Human Action, Skepticism or Postmodernism, Divine Action

Front 2

Human Action (solutions)

Back 2

1. Reson is able to penetrate the barrier. we can have knowledge to get to the other side.

Ex. Plato, Decarte, Kant

Front 3

Skepticism or Postmodernism

Back 3

1. Reason is not able to penetrate the barrier (not smart enough)

Ex. Zeno, Nietzche, Rorty

Front 4

Divine Action

Back 4

1. God alone is able to penetrate the barrier.

Ex. Augustine, MALEBRANCHE

Front 5

Implications of epistemological barrier

Back 5

A. Limitations of our "own stream," yet hope because God grants knowledge.
B. Priority of divine revelation in God's two books: Scripture and Nature.

Front 6

Oakes Proposed Explanation:

Back 6

We no longer believe the necessity and sufficiency of the Bible.

Front 7

Bible is necessary for

Back 7

Knowing God, Knowledge of the Gospel, maintaining spiritual life, knowing God's will.

Front 8

Bible is NOT necessary for

Back 8

knowing about God, His existence, certain attributes about God.

Front 9

Sufficiency for the Bible

Back 9

"wise for salvation.. competent, equipped for every good work.

2 Tim 3:15-17....... "which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus."

Front 10

Implications of sufficiency

Back 10

Implies that we have all the words of God that we need.

Front 11

It does not imply (sufficiency)

Back 11

that no other part of God's creation is useful or helpful.

Front 12

Applications of Sufficiency

Back 12

1 Subtract nothing from the Bible
2 Add nothing to the Bible.
3 Emphasize what Scripture emphasizes

Front 13

Amy Grant Example

Back 13

Source of "revelation" with her marriage. said she felt that God told her it was ok to end her marriage.

Front 14

Biola Statement of Faith

Back 14

Believes the Bible is without mistake

Front 15

Our need for Divine revelation

Back 15

1. Infinite/ Finite gap
2. Creator/creature gap
3. Holy/Sinful gap
4. Noetic effects of sin.

Front 16

We can know God TRULY but

Back 16

Not exhaustively

Front 17

2 primary forms of Divine revelation

Back 17

1. Special Revelation- in scripture
2. General- in His handiwork

Front 18

General revelation

Back 18

Creation and Concience

Front 19

Special Revelation

Back 19

Primary Source: the Bible

effect of Knowledge of God's salvation, Jesus, mystery of the Gospel.

Front 20

Inspiration

Back 20

not people, but TEXT.

Front 21

Inspired (definition)

Back 21

Produced by God, "God Breathed"

Front 22

Verbal

Back 22

The very language used

Front 23

Plenary

Back 23

All, the entirety

Front 24

Key Passages for Inspiration

Back 24

2 Tim 3:16-17 "All Scripture os breathed out by God"

&

2 Peter 1:19-20 "No prophesy was produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God by Holy Spirit"

Front 25

Dual Authorship

Back 25

God and human

Front 26

Inspiration: slogan

Back 26

Bible is the word of God in the words of men

Front 27

Inspiration: Product

Back 27

The word of God, exactly as God wanted it to be, but retains the "personality" of it's authors

Front 28

Canon

Back 28

Rule or standard of measure and refers to the 66 books that make up the Bible

Front 29

Canon Keys

Back 29

1. Church recognized the inspiration of these books, it did not canonize (grant inspiration) them. EX. Inverted Jenny

Key 2: The Role of the Holy Spirit EX Inspiration, preservation ,recognition

Front 30

Importance of Inerrancy

Back 30

If we don't accept all of it, we pick and choose and walk a slippery slope

Front 31

Infallible

Back 31

incapable of error (in spiritual matter)

Front 32

inerrant

Back 32

entirely true (in every matter)

Front 33

Limited inerrancy view (some of the Bible)

Back 33

100% infallible, but not 100% inerrant

Front 34

Autograph

Back 34

original

Front 35

Manuscript

Back 35

copies

Front 36

text

Back 36

the content

Front 37

Translation

Back 37

text into another language

Front 38

transmission

Back 38

copying, translating, recopying, and retranslating

Front 39

textual criticism

Back 39

science of determining original text

Front 40

Response to Bible reporting impossible (such as resurrection)

Back 40

Worldview issue, not Biblical.

Front 41

Response to not explicitly taught in scripture

Back 41

The word "inerrant" is not, but the idea is.

Front 42

response to not taught in history of the church (inerrancy)

Back 42

all of these famous scholars who taught including augustine, and quinas and luther

Front 43

Response to grammatical errors/stylistic concerns

Back 43

a poorly written sentence can still communicate truth.

Front 44

Mistakes of fact

Back 44

1. Eccl "sun rises and goes down" (incorrect teaching)

2. mustard seed is not actually smallest seed
3. There is "no God" psalm
4. Gospel disagreement about who was at the tomb.

Front 45

response to mistakes of fact

Back 45

We need to look at these case by case

Front 46

Reasons to hold full inerrancy

Back 46

Jesus held it, Bible teaches it, church throughout history has taught it.

Front 47

If you buy the doctrine of inspiration

Back 47

God insirite the Bible, God does not er (omnicent and imnipotent), the Bible will have no errors.

Front 48

If you say the Bible will have no errors and you put it up to interpretation, dangers of this are

Back 48

What does this passage say?
Is this passage true?
What is its significance, implications?

Front 49

Biblioidolatry

Back 49

worshipping the Bible instead of God

Front 50

Thought Bible translations

Back 50

NLT, Message, Living Bible

Front 51

Word Bible translations

Back 51

NASB, HCSM, ESV, Amplified, New King James

Front 52

Thought and Word Bible translation

Back 52

NIV

Front 53

Main purpose of timeline

Back 53

We do not need the autographs, we have the text.

Front 54

Secondary purpose of timeline

Back 54

understand translations differ. and appreciate the difference of the Bible

Front 55

Does this mean that my English Translation is not inerrant?

Back 55

While technically inerrant, all good English translations are functionally inerrant.

Front 56

Clarity of the Bible

Back 56

One hand 2 Peter 3:15-16 "hard to understand, ignorant twist words"

Other hand, Understantable Psalm 19:17 "The testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple.

Front 57

Take aways from clarity of the Bible

Back 57

Bible is clear enough for us to get the gospel, when we disagree or are confused the problem is with us.

Front 58

Definitition of Illumination

Back 58

"The work of the Holy Spirit by which he makes the Scripture both understandable and applicable to an individual's life" -Dr. Bruce Ware

Front 59

Role of the Holy Spirit in illumination

Back 59

1 aid in our understanding of the Bible (content)
2 aid in our acceptance of the Bible (application)

Front 60

Roman Catholic Position on Authority

Back 60

Sola Scriptura (mary's assumption into heaven"

Ex cathedra

give authority to Church, pope, Bible, Saints, etc.

Front 61

Liberal Protestant Position

Back 61

Must be made on reasonable experience, hold pope, church, and more to authority but self as well.

Front 62

Evangelical position on Authority

Back 62

Scripture has ultimate authority.

Front 63

Sola Scriptura

Back 63

Scripture alone

Acts 17:10-11 Jews were more noble than those in Thessalonica, examined scriptures daily

Front 64

Two big H's of today

Back 64

Hell and homosexuality

Front 65

Final Thoughts of this class

Back 65

If the Bible says it, we must listen.
and
we need not take ourselves seriously BUT we MUST take the word of God seriously.

Front 66

The God of the Bible is

Back 66

a personal god who speaks

Front 67

Decree of God=

Back 67

Causal words